Agile Innovation
Psst, this is your conscious. I’m here to remind you about something you have thought about, but then hid away in the back of your mind. Lots of this agile stuff is hypocritical; it preaches evolution and change, but then we ask the same old three questions at standup every day. Also, why must we have standup every day? Isn’t that kind of prescriptive? Agile methods are supposed to facilitate innovation through iterative development, followed by inspection and adaption. They practice the scientific method of measurement and feedback on products and teamwork. So why are the agile practices themselves magically exempt from this precious evolution?
I believe there are two main reasons. First off, it is to protect inexperienced agile practitioners from themselves. With free rein to morph product and process, there is a strong likelihood that by six months into a project, the practices followed by the team would have deviated from the proven and tested methods of the most successful teams. The risk of failure would increase, and every project in a company would be using a radically different approach making integration, scaling and team member transfers a major problem.
The other reason is a little more sinister. Most of the creators, proponents and promotors of agile methods have interests in keeping the methods pure vanilla. This is so they can create training
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
"Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true." - Francis Bacon |