The Anti-Collaboration Bandwagon

David is an experienced project manager, and founder and CEO of, a SaaS project management and collaboration application.

Following a much-debated essay in the Harvard Business Review titled “Collaboration Overload,” the Economist has joined the fray with “The Collaboration Curse,” a biting but more superficial attack on workplace collaboration. As I argued in a blog named “Harvard Business Review is wrong on collaboration,” these pieces rely on academic research to reach some far-fetched conclusions that are not anchored in the reality of corporate America.

I was practicing collaborative project management when Apple's Macintosh was considered the coolest technology on the planet, so I know a couple of things about the topic. Also, as a keen reader of both venerable publications, I am surprised that the articles actually passed what should be a rigorous editorial review process. Although I am firm believer in open debate, I am disappointed that so little of value was added to the body of information about the topic.

Here’s a quick overview of the points in the Economist article about the collaboration “cult” (their word, not mine):

  • There is pressure on the part of management to adopt new collaborative tools.
  • It is considered good corporate practice for employees to “help each other all the time.”
  • Because of open plan offices, people are forced to “share large noisy spaces.”

The …

Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.


Continue reading...

Log In
Sign Up

"Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh."

- George Bernard Shaw



Vendor Events

See all Vendor Events