Stakeholders: Changing Attitudes, Securing Support

From the Voices on Project Management Blog
by , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Voices on Project Management offers insights, tips, advice and personal stories from project managers in different regions and industries. The goal is to get you thinking, and spark a discussion. So, if you read something that you agree with--or even disagree with--leave a comment.

About this Blog


View Posts By:

Cameron McGaughy
Marian Haus
Lynda Bourne
Lung-Hung Chou
Bernadine Douglas
Conrado Morlan
Kevin Korterud
Peter Tarhanidis
Vivek Prakash
Cyndee Miller
David Wakeman
Jen Skrabak
Mario Trentim
Shobhna Raghupathy
Roberto Toledo
Christian Bisson
Jess Tayel
Rex Holmlin
Taralyn Frasqueri-Molina
Wanda Curlee

Recent Posts

Move Beyond Herding Cats

Strategy In a VUCA World—Part 2

Strategy In a VUCA World—Part 1

Just Ignore the Trends—and Run to the Noise

The Brexit Effect—Deal With It

Categories: Communication

My last post touched on stakeholder attitudes. Attitude is derived from perceptions--in this context, the stakeholder's perception of the project and how its outcomes will affect the stakeholder's interests.

Fortunately, perceptions are negotiable and can be changed by effective communication. Change perceptions and a change in attitude will follow.

In my research, I considered two key dimensions to attitude:  
1.    How supportive or opposed the stakeholder is toward the project
2.    How receptive the stakeholder is to communication from the project team

Although receptiveness may seem less important, you cannot change a stakeholder's level of support if they refuse to communicate with you.

Levels of support can range from active opposition to active support. For each of the important stakeholders, the project team needs to understand the stakeholder's current level of support and then determine a realistic optimum level.

Exactly what that realistic optimum is varies. For example, environmental activists can never be realistically expected to support a new road through a wilderness area. The realistic optimum may be passive opposition and a communications plan developed to negotiate an outcome that the environmentalists can live with.  

Your project sponsor should be an active supporter. Communication needs to be planned to engage the stakeholder in actively supporting the project.

That means open communication. If the stakeholder is unwilling to communicate, ways need to be devised to open channels. This may involve using other stakeholders in the network around the project to open the communication, changing the way you communicate or just plain persistence.

Only after communication channels are open can you start to listen to the other person and understand their needs, concerns or ambitions. Once these are known, you're in a position to either explain how the current project meets those needs or consider risk-mitigation strategies to modify the project to reduce issues and enhance opportunities.

The whole point of stakeholder management is to optimize the overall attitude of the stakeholder community to allow the project to succeed.

A very significant proportion of the risks around most projects are people-based. The only way to identify, manage and/or mitigate these risks is by effective two-way communication. More on this later.
Posted by Lynda Bourne on: September 15, 2009 01:51 PM | Permalink

Comments (1)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Ludovic Leteurtre
Thank you for this article which is excellent and absolutely true.
I've sometimes experienced seen project managers are "technical oriented" and focus on the technical and operational aspects, letting aside the communication with the customer and the monitoring of their client's perception. At the end, in this case, the customer doesn't remain a customer ...

So thank you again for this article.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.


"Weaseling out of things is good. It's what separates us from the other animals....except weasels."

- Homer Simpson