Project Management

Organization Failures Cause Project Failures

From the Vision to Value: Executing Strategically Focused Initiatives Blog
Executing initiatives, and their component projects, successfully means delivering value to customers. The Vision to Value blog focuses on solutions to the organizational problems that inhibit that success.

About this Blog


Recent Posts

Do Executive Sponsors, Not Project Managers, Hold the Key to Project Success?

Has an Executive Sponsors Ever Deserted You?

Are Strategic Projects Really the Most Important?

Culture v. Project Success: How to Win

Are You Herding the Cats or Leading the Cats?

Honesty, Vision, Transparency ImageVision, honesty, and transparency: three key ingredients for project success. I reminded of this when thumbing through the archives this week and ran across an interview I gave on Blog Talk Radio's Tom on Leadership program. His audience, primarily from the C-Suite, is keen to understand the connection between troubled and failing projects and their organization's overall health. Projects are, after all, the proverbial canaries in our organization's coalmine. Projects stop performing because there is trouble in the organization.

Honesty's Virtue

Honesty is at the core of any healthy organization's culture. Without honesty, all is lost. This is never more apparent when projects seemingly fail over night. We call these watermelon projects (green on the outside and red on the inside) projects are indicative of a leadership culture that punishes bad news.

Honesty must permeate the company from the board to the individual contributor. Project teams in healthy, honest organizations, report status accurately. Unpleasant news brings offers of assistance as opposed to criticism.

Honesty requires trust. Trust, however, cannot be blind. Every organization has a representative slice of humanity; unfortunately, this includes people who may not hold honesty as a virtue. Furthermore, there are times when our teams simply do have the insight to know they are getting into trouble. For these reasons, every trustful manager has to verify intentions quietly and discreetly. This is not mistrust; it is a prudent measure to ensure the organization as a whole is functioning properly.

Vision's Guidance

Without identifying a vision or goal, the team is directionless. Failure to develop and communicate a vision is a primary responsibility of the executive sponsor. He or she must maintain a clear vision and clarify any adjustments to meet changes in the business environment. Most executives in companies with an inadequate vision are in denial that the condition exists. Their organizations are steeped in mistrust and dishonesty. It starts at the top, where management denies there is an unclear direction and manifests in an apathetic team unwilling to take the political risk of highlighting management's error.

In these organizations, projects languish in the indecision. Without knowing the proper direction, no one can make critical decisions (as that implies accountability), and projects stall.

Transparency's Test

Transparency comes part and parcel with an honest organization. One of the key features of an honest organization is that they are transparent. An honest organization has nothing to hide. Honesty, however, does not guarantee transparency. Within any organization, denial and ego can create pockets of problems that management must diligently discover.

In trusting, honest organizations, it is often difficult to find these enclaves of opacity. They produce just enough data to maintain a façade of openness. Even in non-covert situations, transparency takes confidence and constant communication. The best of intentions to complete a set of difficult tasks can create an environment where groups, focused on their goals forget to ask for help. It creeps over them slowly like an evening fog, enveloping the workday, eliminating the ability to stand back and assess the state of affairs.

Transparency needs management's help. Management must be involved with their people—mingling, asking questions, looking for stress, and proactively proposing solutions.

The Canary's Song

Just like a canary, projects in a poisoned organization go silent. There is little realism in their reports and management must ferret out the problems. If the organization is unhealthy, it takes an outside party to untangle the mess. Someone must call attention to honesty's absence, abused trust, and unclear visions. They need to look inside the opaque box and point to the political problems hindering a transparent operation.

Any parent knows this warning sign. Children play in a normal cacophony of clangs, thunks, and bumps. To a degree, parents are numb to these sounds. However, the instant those noises stop, mental alarm bells ring. Parents know there is trouble in the offing. The same is true in project management. The minute the project goes quiet or the troubles seem to disappear, it is time to start asking questions. The team is probably in trouble and unwilling or unable to recognize the issues.

Posted on: October 18, 2015 10:54 PM | Permalink

Comments (7)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Thanks for this very insightful contribution.

Thank you, Ebenezer.

Yes, all these three cover Ethics requirements from Project Management perspective. Useful and described effectively.

Thank you, Pravin.

Sorry, with all my respect, I think we are mixing things. One thing is all related organizational values. The other is related to project failures. And the first thing is to define what is a project failure for the organization. You can find lot of organizations that has not been implemented what you state as values and the projects running by the organization achieve the project objectives. Then, besides if I agree or not with you, I fully believe that we need to take into account we do not have to mix things.

Hi Tood,
Good insights. Calling attention to "honesty's absence, abused trust, and unclear visions" does by itself odes not resolve these things. It needs a more radical shift in perspective. Such paradigm shifts take time. Hence, I think for projects to succeed, a better focus would be the 'micro culture' within the project environment. I have seen highly effective project teams in organizations that lack the factors you describe. Prabhaker Panditi

Dear Todd
Interesting reflection on the topic
Thanks for sharing

Two very important points: Vision (including
ability to communicate) and Transparency (in processes and outcomes)

The absence of canary singing may be an indicator to take into account

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.


"Bad artists always admire each other's work."

- Oscar Wilde