Project Management

Separating Standards and Knowledge Management

From the Voices on Project Management Blog
by , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Voices on Project Management offers insights, tips, advice and personal stories from project managers in different regions and industries. The goal is to get you thinking, and spark a discussion. So, if you read something that you agree with--or even disagree with--leave a comment.

About this Blog

RSS

View Posts By:

Cameron McGaughy
Lynda Bourne
Kevin Korterud
Conrado Morlan
Peter Tarhanidis
Mario Trentim
Christian Bisson
Yasmina Khelifi
Sree Rao
Soma Bhattacharya
Emily Luijbregts
David Wakeman
Jen Skrabak
Marat Oyvetsky
Ramiro Rodrigues
Wanda Curlee
Lenka Pincot
cyndee miller
Jorge Martin Valdes Garciatorres

Past Contributors:

Rex Holmlin
Vivek Prakash
Dan Goldfischer
Linda Agyapong
Jim De Piante
Siti Hajar Abdul Hamid
Bernadine Douglas
Michael Hatfield
Deanna Landers
Kelley Hunsberger
Taralyn Frasqueri-Molina
Alfonso Bucero Torres
Marian Haus
Shobhna Raghupathy
Peter Taylor
Joanna Newman
Saira Karim
Jess Tayel
Lung-Hung Chou
Rebecca Braglio
Roberto Toledo
Geoff Mattie

Recent Posts

9 Key Skills of Great Project Managers

How Can We Keep Project Conflict in Check?

A Roadmap for Continuous Learning

The Power of Agile Team Cohesion

What Qualities Do the Best Project Managers Have?

Categories

2020, Adult Development, Agile, Agile, Agile, agile, Agile management, Agile management, Agile;Community;Talent management, Artificial Intelligence, Backlog, Basics, Benefits Realization, Best Practices, BIM, business acumen, Business Analysis, Business Analysis, Business Case, Business Intelligence, Business Transformation, Calculating Project Value, Canvas, Career Development, Career Development, Career Help, Career Help, Careers, Careers, Categories: Career Help, Change Management, Cloud Computing, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Communication, Communication, Communication, Complexity, Conflict, Conflict Management, Consulting, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Cost, COVID-19, Crises, Crisis Management, critical success factors, Cultural Awareness, Culture, Decision Making, Design Thinking, Digital Transformation, digital transformation, Digitalisation, Disruption, Diversity, Documentation, Earned Value Management, Education, EEWH, Enterprise Risk Management, Escalation management, Estimating, Ethics, execution, Expectations Management, Facilitation, feasibility studies, Future, Future of Project Management, Generational PM, Governance, Government, green building, Growth, Horizontal Development, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Resources, Inclusion, Innovation, Intelligent Building, International, Internet of Things (IOT), Internet of Things (IoT), IOT, IT Project Management, IT Strategy, Knowledge, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, lean construction, LEED, Lessons Learned, Lessons learned;Retrospective, Managing for Stakeholders, managing stakeholders as clients, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Methodology, Metrics, Micromanagement, Microsoft Project PPM, Motivation, Negotiation, Neuroscience, neuroscience, New Practitioners, Nontraditional Project Management, OKR, Online Learning, opportunity, Organizational Project Management, Pandemic, People, People management, Planing, planning, PM & the Economy, PM History, PM Think About It, PMBOK Guide, PMI, PMI EMEA 2018, PMI EMEA Congress 2017, PMI EMEA Congress 2019, PMI Global Conference 2017, PMI Global Conference 2018, PMI Global Conference 2019, PMI Global Congress 2010 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2011 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2011 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2012 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2012 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2013 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2013 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2014 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2014 - North America, PMI GLobal Congress EMEA 2018, PMI PMO Symposium 2012, PMI PMO Symposium 2013, PMI PMO Symposium 2015, PMI PMO Symposium 2016, PMI PMO Symposium 2017, PMI PMO Symposium 2018, PMI Pulse of the Profession, PMO, pmo, PMO Project Management Office, portfolio, Portfolio Management, portfolio management, Portfolios (PPM), presentations, Priorities, Probability, Problem Structuring Methods, Process, Procurement, profess, Program Management, Programs (PMO), project, Project Delivery, Project Dependencies, Project Failure, project failure, Project Leadership, Project Management, project management, project management office, Project Planning, project planning, Project Requirements, Project Success, Ransomware, Reflections on the PM Life, Remote, Remote Work, Requirements Management, Research Conference 2010, Researching the Value of Project Management, Resiliency, Risk, Risk Management, Risk management, risk management, ROI, Roundtable, Salary Survey, Scheduling, Scope, Scrum, search, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, Servant Leadership, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Social Responsibility, Sponsorship, Stakeholder, Stakeholder Management, stakeholder management, Strategy, swot, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Communication, Taskforce, Team Building, Teams, Teams in Agile, Teams in Agile, teamwork, Tech, Technical Debt, Technology, TED Talks, The Project Economy, Time, Timeline, Tools, tools, Transformation, transformation, Transition, Trust, Value, Vertical Development, Volunteering, Volunteering #Leadership #SelfLeadership, Volunteering Sharing Knowledge Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Trust, VUCA, Women in PM, Women in Project Management

Date



by Lynda Bourne

In my last post—It’s Time for a Long, Hard Look at Processes—I questioned if A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) should be updated every four years, or if it should become a dynamic knowledge management system similar to Wikipedia. The post generated a number of comments, which I’m going to try to address now.

The fundamental purpose of a standard is to offer standardized advice organizations can rely on. Standards are frequently referenced in contracts and other formal documentation, and they form the basis for certifications. The PMBOK® Guide fulfills all of these purposes. In this situation, stability is essential. Globally, standards are reviewed and updated every four to five years to balance the need for currency against the need for consistency. 

The PMI Registered Education Provider (R.E.P.) community has a busy few months each time the PMBOK® Guide is updated, requiring them to go through their training materials to bring them all up to date. This is magnified many times over as organizations around the world update their documentation to align with the new standard.

But the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard is only one part of the PMBOK® Guide. The guidance part is the larger aspect of the book and also, in my opinion, the most useful. This element is a knowledge repository and if access to validated information is readily available, knowledge management systems should seek to be as up to date as possible. To achieve this, most knowledge management systems are web-based and assume that once information is printed, it is no longer current. Managing a knowledge management system needs skill and knowledge but should be a real-time, full-time function.

Given this, I suggest that PMI separate the standard part of the document from the knowledge element. The standard section would consist of the ANSI Standard (part two of the current PMBOK® Guide) and the supporting core knowledge that does not change much. This standard and supporting information would remain on the four- to five-year update cycle. The resulting document would be much thinner than the current PMBOK® Guide.

The knowledge element builds onto this as a cloud-based resource and should be the subject of continual improvement and updating. Allowing PMI members to contribute their knowledge on a continuous basis, subject to review and edit, would allow the body of knowledge to grow and adapt as project management grows and adapts.

A careful design of the knowledge structure based on the PMBOK® Guide—augmented with information from the other standards published by PMI and enhanced with current developments from industry—would create a very useful and dynamic source of knowledge for the global project management community.

If access to this project management knowledge bank is free to members and available for a fee to commercial users and non-members, the value of membership would be enhanced and PMI would be positioned to maintain its position as a global leader in the development of project management.

It’s an interesting challenge. What do you think?

Posted by Lynda Bourne on: April 25, 2019 07:00 PM | Permalink

Comments (11)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Tamer Zeyad Sadiq Assistant Cost Manager| Turner & Townsend Riyadh, Ar Riyad, Saudi Arabia
good points

avatar
Alok Priyadarshi Project Manager| Tata Consulting Engineers Limited Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Great suggestions Lynda!!

avatar
Davida Trumbo Fairfax, Va, USA
I agree with you. It is an interesting challenge. Knowledge is dynamic and does not wait for continuous improvement; however, people are slower to react. Standards provides a baseline in which to mature organizational capabilities. The conception of a knowledge bank would allow attenuation of standards to adequately reflect the reality of organizational components.

In addition to a knowledge as a deposit, we should provide the interest rate of that knowledge base on organizational maturity. We will inject error in the knowledge bank if we do not provide the information in relationship to organizational maturity. For example, low maturity organizations will not be capable of adapting best practices until they have the foundational ability to digest its objectives. One manner in which to preclude disillusionment based on outcome expectations is to include how long it took to institutionalize the practice and the organizational maturity level (e.g., ad hoc to nirvana).

Quality is another dimension that needs to be factored into the success of implementation of a nugget of knowledge. Although Philip Crosby correctly stated, "Quality is free," meaning that investment in improving quality provides quick returns, the understanding of continuous improvement in service provision needs to improve for the acquisition community.

My two cents...

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Thanks

avatar
Thayyaba Shaik Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Thanks for sharing!

avatar
Mauro Sotille Chair, Senior Consultant / Project Manager| PM Tech Consulting Porto Alegre, Rs, Brazil
Hi, Linda. I definitely agree with you!

avatar
Aditya Lal Program Director| Sita Corp Belle Mead, Nj, USA
My 2 cents and food for thoughts for others "Isn't it, it is us (the practitioners of the PMBOK) who will take the PMI standards to the new level by implementing the practice and enforcing the need." For example, can I provide a detailed estimate for a high-level requirement?" No I can't The estimation process must be followed and we must get the details of the requirement. I strongly believe that apart from the project managers the sponsor and key stakeholders should be well versed with the PMBOK if we want to take it to the new heights.

avatar
Sean Whitaker Project Management Consultant| Crystal Consulting Christchurch, New Zealand
What about also having a real time wiki as well as The PMBOK guide? As the guide says it doesn’t contain all good practice, just that used most of the time. A book with all good practices would be far too big so how about a wiki to capture all aspects of good practice?

avatar
Lynda Bourne Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
Thanks Sean, your comment neatly sums up where my thinking and the weight of comments on and off line have been going.

avatar
Mustafa Aslan PM | PQ Group Kadikoy, Istanbul, Türkiye
Knowledge and standarts should be in harmony as many different type of disciplines using PMBOK.

Instead of seperating the standarts and knowledge, what do you think about the particular booklets

avatar
Lynda Bourne Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
Just announced by PMI: Learn How PMI Standards Are Transforming

PMI standards are transforming. The first standards product to undergo transformation is A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), which includes The Standard for Project Management. Past versions of the standard were developed with a process focus, but the next version will take a principles-based approach. Principles consist of statements that capture and summarize generally accepted objectives for the practice of project management and its core functions. For example, “the project team tailors its delivery approach to the unique characteristics of the project” might be one principle.

Another significant change with this edition of the PMBOK® Guide is that the guide will take a systems view of project management. A systems view recognizes that projects represent a system of interacting, interrelated and interdependent performance domains that form a unified whole.

The tools and techniques for applying the principles within the performance domains will be hosted on a new interactive digital content platform. This will allow for constantly expanding depth and breadth of content to assist practitioners in their daily practice. All of the content is fully vetted with a team of volunteer subject matter experts.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

I hate asking for change. They always make a face. It's like asking them to donate a kidney.

- George Costanza

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors