Project Management

How open are YOU to changing your launch plans?

From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management. I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success. This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.

About this Blog


Recent Posts

How does psychological safety relate to holding space?

Securing contingency reserves is the responsible thing to do!

Let's flatten five agile fallacies!

Planning for those project disasters that no one wants to think about

What's the link between emotional intelligence and psychological safety?

During the last week PMI announced that, based on the feedback they had received from stakeholders, they would be delaying the significant changes to the Project Management Professional (PMP)® certification exam which had originally planned to be launched in mid-December 2019 to July 1, 2020.

When I first read this, I felt a burst of vicarious relief for those exam candidates who were likely experiencing a lot of stress with the original date.

I have no doubt that this was the right decision for PMI to take.

The proposed changes to the exam are likely to be more significant than others made over the past decade. With the last batch of changes to the exam having been implemented in March 2018, a significant update within two years will not only cause candidates angst but will also reduce the return on investment for the study materials which training companies would have so recently updated.

After further reflection I realized there are some good lessons in change management with this decision:

  • As a not-for-profit association, stakeholder satisfaction may be more crucial to PMI than if they were a for profit entity, but regardless, they have been very proactive at communicating both the rationale and the scope of proposed changes even though these announcements were likely to upset certain the stakeholders. Often, while considering a disruptive change, our temptation might be to avoid communicating anything until there is a full understanding about the impacts but that usually won't give stakeholders sufficient time to react to the information.
  • They were open to hearing negative feedback about the changes. It's easy for leaders to say that they are willing to hear criticism about a change they have championed but much harder to take it when it happens.
  • PMI decision makers were willing to make a change late in the game for the right reasons. I'm used to seeing leaders' appetite for change drop drastically as a proposed implementation date draws near. This makes sense as change deliverables need to be sufficiently stable before a launch date, but if there is evidence that the benefits of sticking to a date will be outweighed by the impacts of a premature launch, leaders should be willing to accept some near term embarrassment in order to realize a more sustainable outcome.

I have no idea who was the decision maker at PMI who pushed for this delay to the launch date, but this demonstrates the sort of good judgment which we should demand from change leaders.

Posted on: September 01, 2019 11:38 AM | Permalink

Comments (9)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
I totally agree with you. I believe PMI ddI what’s best for its member and exam candidates and if this came after feedback received from members then that is a positive sign that members voice is actually heard.

Glad the PMP exam is all over for most of us. Good to see PMI listening to its members. Thanks Kiron.

Very interesting., thanks for sharing

Early in my career, I was lead to believe that delaying launch plans meant failure when in reality I have found that pushing for a project launch when there are significant barriers is, in general, a good idea and shows significant leadership on the part of the project managers and sponsors. (I will note that there are times when you have to launch no matter what and that too, takes solid leadership and an open eye to the challenges) I am sure there must be a good reason for the delay and applaud the leaders who did the right thing.

Agreed, Kiron. Good decision to delay the implementation. Certainly, need to pragmatically weigh the balance of optimal delivery vs. adhering to some schedule.

Thanks Rami, Sante, Eduin, Christi & Andrew!

Thank you, Kiron. I value the wisdom in keeping an open mind and making changes when it is the right thing to do. I really liked how Christi stated this in her response to your blog.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.