Guessing is not a strategy: How to build decision velocity with AI and real-time data
June 10, 2026 | Live Webinar
Cultural Shift: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Project Practice
 We are now facing a new wave of transformation like the “webification” era two decades ago. This time, it is artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). As project practitioners, we must ask: how do these technologies reshape company culture, and how do we guide organizations through the turbulence? AI is not just another tool—it changes how decisions are made, how work is distributed, and how value is delivered. It can automate repetitive tasks, provide predictive insights, and even challenge traditional hierarchies by empowering data-driven decision-making. However, these benefits come with cultural challenges, including trust, transparency, and ethical responsibility. Cultural change is often the most challenging aspect. With AI, the stakes are higher because people fear being replaced. To make a seamless shift, secure senior management buy-in; without leadership commitment, AI initiatives stall. Start with a pilot project involving a small, willing team that can demonstrate clear benefits, such as faster reporting, reduced errors, or improved forecasting. Use advocates and let these satisfied users share their success stories, which build momentum and reduce resistance. AI adoption should feel like a snowball rolling downhill, gaining speed and enthusiasm as more people recognize its value. Benefits must be crystal clear, where “AI” alone does not mean business value. Identify specific improvements, such as automating workflows to reduce manual errors, enhancing project visibility with predictive analytics, optimizing resource allocation to lower costs, and freeing staff from repetitive tasks so they can focus on creative, strategic work. When AI is introduced only for marketing buzz or compliance optics, resistance will be stronger. On the other hand, the cultural shift becomes smoother as the first AI initiative demonstrates tangible benefits. Information must be meaningful. Too often, AI systems generate dashboards or reports that overwhelm rather than enlighten. If end users cannot quickly find actionable insights, they will revert to old habits. Communication is critical, as it explains what AI will deliver, when, and how it should be used. It also provides training to ensure staff understand the system’s strengths and limitations and utilizes pilots to refine usability before scaling. In short, AI should empower, not confuse. Cultural change is cultural change, whether it is the web or AI. Start with strategy: what outcomes does the company want? Then identify processes that are most critical to achieving those outcomes. Engage the knowledge workers who understand those processes best. Facilitate discussions on how AI can enhance their capabilities. This engagement ensures that AI adoption is not imposed but rather co-created. It keeps the focus on the value delivered, rather than technology for its own sake. Remember: technology is a means, not an end. Bring the human side of the story. Sometimes the simplest benefits win hearts. During the web shift, putting the phone directory online was a breakthrough. For AI, start with something equally obvious, such as AI-driven scheduling that saves hours of manual coordination, smart search that retrieves project documents instantly, and/or automated compliance checks that reduce audit stress. Do not sell paradigm shifts; just sneak them in through everyday wins. From these perspectives, several themes emerge:
As project leaders, we must not only deliver benefits but also safeguard ethical values, as prescribed in the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct and stipulated in PMI Ethical Decision Making Framework. Here are actionable steps:
In closing, AI and ML are reshaping it today, just as the web transformed project management two decades ago. The challenge is not only technical but cultural. By focusing on strategy, demonstrating clear benefits, and embedding ethics into every initiative, we can deliver projects that are both successful and responsible. Let us commit to being ethical while delivering benefits and consider these questions:
References: Project Management Institute. (2025 November). PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/ethics/pmi-code-of-ethics.pdf Project Management Institute. (2025 November). PMI Ethical Decision Making Framework. pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/ethics/ethical-decision-making-framework.pdf ==== |
What is new in PMBOK 8 – An ethics perspective
Categories:
Ethics as a competence,
Values,
Behavior,
values,
code of ethics,
Ethical Leadership,
Decision-making,
Ethics Insight Team,
Ethics Bistro,
Business Ethics,
code of conduct,
PMI Talent Triangle,
Ways of Working,
Decision-making,
Values,
Business Ethics,
AI,
Project,
PMI Program Management,
Do the right thing,
Culture,
Ethical Dilemma,
respect,
Professional Responsibility,
Professional Conduct,
Honesty,
Respect,
Responsibility,
Project Management,
Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,
honesty,
responsibility,
professonal conduct,
volunteers,
professional conduct,
Digital Transformation,
Ethics in Communication,
Agile,
Leadership,
Decision Making,
Ethics,
Diversity,
Organizational Project Management,
Information Technology,
Organizational Culture,
Governance,
Artificial Intelligence
Categories: Ethics as a competence, Values, Behavior, values, code of ethics, Ethical Leadership, Decision-making, Ethics Insight Team, Ethics Bistro, Business Ethics, code of conduct, PMI Talent Triangle, Ways of Working, Decision-making, Values, Business Ethics, AI, Project, PMI Program Management, Do the right thing, Culture, Ethical Dilemma, respect, Professional Responsibility, Professional Conduct, Honesty, Respect, Responsibility, Project Management, Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, honesty, responsibility, professonal conduct, volunteers, professional conduct, Digital Transformation, Ethics in Communication, Agile, Leadership, Decision Making, Ethics, Diversity, Organizational Project Management, Information Technology, Organizational Culture, Governance, Artificial Intelligence
 Imagine a team of explorers crossing a desert. No matter how skilled its members are or how modern their vehicles are, they may not succeed in reaching their destination without a compass. In project management, ethics serve as that compass, guiding decision-making, fostering trust, and ensuring accountability. For PMI Members, the compass is the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Developed even before the first edition of the Project Management Book of Knowledge, the Code was and remains the holder of the guardrails of the project management profession. PMBOK 7 replaced knowledge areas with performance domains. The 8th is more aligned with the Agile delivery approach, whilst retaining the importance of good governance. Like the previous version, the PMBOK highlights alignment with both internal and external environments. It is important to note the focus on artificial intelligence and sustainability. Principles of project management PMBOK 8 simplified the 12 principles from the 7th edition to create a more focused and actionable foundation for modern project management. The principles of project management are aligned with the values of PMI’s Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. They do not follow the same format, and they are not duplicative; rather, the principles and the Code of Ethics are complementary. ·Adopt a holistic view: Consider the project within its larger organizational and ecosystem context. ·Focus on value: Prioritize delivering tangible value and aligning project outcomes with strategic goals. ·Embed quality into processes and deliverables: Integrate quality throughout the project lifecycle, not just as a final check. ·Be an accountable leader: Take ownership and responsibility for the project's success and outcomes. ·Integrate sustainability within all project areas: Include environmental and social considerations in project work. ·Build an empowered culture: Foster a project environment that empowers team members. Enterprise environmental factors: Internal and external to the Organization ·The standard emphasises the impact of organizational culture, structure, and governance. Aspects like vision, mission, values, beliefs, cultural norms, leadership style, hierarchy and authority relationships, organizational style, ethics, and code of conduct remain critical success factors, as well as a framework for ethical decision making. Social and cultural influences and issues. External factors include political climate, regional customs and traditions, public holidays and events, codes of conduct, ethics, and perceptions. Artificial Intelligence (AI) AI ethical issues, especially the responsible use of AI tools and the negative impact on project team members, are an especially important aspect. Topics like data privacy and security can be addressed using technical controls. Issues like bias and fairness require special attention from project managers. Lack of clarity on who is responsible when AI-driven decisions go wrong can create confusion and an unending blame game. AI agents cannot be (yet) included in a Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, or Informed (RACI) matrix. Although their use is unavoidable, the responsibility and accountability remain with the human user. The use of AI is dependent on context, and it should be assessed for each project through a decision-making process to determine when AI can assist with tasks or provide more time for other valuable activities. The evaluation should be focused on the use of AI to produce project artifacts. Initiative-taking measures should be considered to identify and assess the risk of incorporating AI and determine if it is acceptable or it should be controlled. Below is a list of some ethical concerns related to the use of AI in projects
·Diversification of the data sets on which the AI system is trained; ·Periodic tests conducted on the AI system, with particular focus on bias; and ·Involvement of different teams in the development of the AI system. Procurement is another ethics area of focus that PMBOK 8 provides guidance on. In chapter X4.9.2, Sensitivity of Legal Actions and Upholding Ethics Codes, the standard provides considerations to avoid impact on project outcomes and stakeholder relationships: ·Nuanced communication. ·Escalation protocols. ·Confidentiality. ·Impartiality. PMBOK 7 explicitly references the PMI Code of Ethics as a complementary and essential guide for project professionals. This code provides the specific rules for ethical conduct, based on core values of honesty, responsibility, respect, and fairness.
|
Falsified by AI, Rectified by Ethics: Project Managers at the Crossroads
 The rise of generative artificial intelligence has ushered in unprecedented efficiencies across industries. However, as highlighted in the article “Phony AI-Created Receipts Become Real Problem for Businesses” (PYMNTS, 2025), it has also enabled new forms of ethical misconduct. The report reveals a troubling trend: employees using AI-powered image generation tools to create fraudulent expense receipts. Platforms like AppZen and Ramp have detected a surge in falsified documents, with AppZen reporting that 14% of all fraudulent submissions last month were AI-generated, a stark increase from zero the previous year. These receipts often feature realistic details such as wrinkles, itemized menus, and forged signatures, making them difficult to detect. This misuse of AI technology violates the core principles of ethical conduct, particularly within the project management profession. The Project Management Institute (PMI) Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct emphasizes four foundational values: responsibility, respect, fairness, and honesty (PMI, 2016). Falsifying receipts for reimbursement breaches all four values. It undermines trust, exploits organizational systems, and shifts financial burdens unfairly with actions that are antithetical to the integrity expected of project professionals. To navigate such ethical dilemmas, PMI offers the Ethical Decision-Making Framework (EDMF), a structured tool that guides professionals through evaluating options, considering stakeholder impact, and aligning decisions with PMI’s core values (PMI, 2019). The EDMF encourages reflection on whether an action is legal, fair, and in line with professional standards. In cases like AI-generated receipt fraud, the framework would clearly identify the behavior as unethical, regardless of technological sophistication or perceived harmlessness. Discrediting the use of AI for fraudulent purposes is essential. While AI can enhance productivity, its misuse for deception erodes organizational culture and exposes companies to financial and reputational risks. Ethical misconduct, especially when aided by advanced tools, must be met with robust countermeasures. These include implementing AI-detection systems, conducting regular audits, and fostering a culture of ethics through training and leadership modeling. Project professionals must lead by example. As stewards of organizational resources and strategy, they are uniquely positioned to champion ethical behavior. This includes reporting misconduct, mentoring peers, and integrating ethical considerations into project planning and execution. Organizations should also reinforce ethical standards by embedding the PMI Code of Ethics into performance evaluations and decision-making processes. In conclusion, the project management community must remain vigilant and proactive. The misuse of AI to falsify expense receipts is not merely a technical issue, but a moral one. By adhering to PMI’s Code of Ethics and leveraging the EDMF, professionals can uphold integrity, protect organizational assets, and ensure that technological advancements serve the greater good. As the use of AI becomes mainstream and widespread, the improper application becomes prevalent. How would you practice ethical leadership in this situation? What guardrails would you implement to mitigate the ethical use of AI? Our Ethics Advisory Team loves to hear from you on your perspectives. References Project Management Institute. (2016). Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. https://www.pmi.org/about/ethics/code Project Management Institute. (2019). Ethical Decision-Making Framework. https://www.pmi.org/about/ethics/ethical-decision-making-framework PYMNTS. (2025, October 25). Phony AI-Created Receipts Become Real Problem for Businesses. https://www.pymnts.com/news/security-and-risk/2025/phony-ai-created-receipts-become-real-problem-for-businesses |
Facing an ethics complaint? Don’t Panic: Hints for PMI Ethics Complaint’s Respondent
| Getting notice that you’re accused of violating PMI’s Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct is unsettling. Breathe. This is the moment to steady yourself, get clear on the facts, and respond thoughtfully. The path forward is practical and values-based. Use the following steps to organize your response and act with responsibility, respect, fairness, and honesty.
A steady, principled response demonstrates professionalism under pressure. Focus on facts, align with the Code, cooperate fully, and—if needed—make amends and show how you will do better. Don’t panic. Lead with integrity, and let that guide your next steps. Familiarize yourself with the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct and refer to Ethics Case Responses & Findings for more details. Let me know if you find this article valuable. What other hints would you add? |
The Hidden Cost of Falsified Receipts: A Breach of PMI’s Ethical Foundations
|
In the bustling offices of YKF Technical Solutions, a mid-sized IT firm, Lai-mui, its project manager, was leading a high-stakes software deployment for a government client. With tight deadlines and mounting pressure, Lai-mui delegated expense reporting to her trusted team lead, Deejay. Weeks later, during a routine audit, discrepancies surfaced as receipts for meals, travel, and equipment were inflated or entirely fabricated. Deejay admitted to falsifying receipts to “compensate for overtime and stress.” Lai-mui was stunned. What seemed like a minor infraction was, in fact, a serious ethical breach. This scenario is not uncommon, yet it strikes at the heart of the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, which is built on four core values: Responsibility, Respect, Fairness, and Honesty. Violations of PMI’s Core Values
Applying the PMI Ethical Decision-Making Framework (EDMF) Lai-mui, now faced with an ethical dilemma, turned to the PMI Ethical Decision-Making Framework. The EDMF guided her through:
Call to Action The project management community must treat ethics as a living practice, not a checkbox. We must:
Conclusion Ethical leadership is not just about doing things right; it’s about doing the right things. Falsifying receipts may seem minor, but its ripple effects can compromise entire projects. Let’s recommit to the values that define our profession and lead with integrity, every step of the way. Questions for Reflection
References: Project Management Institute, Inc. (2025). Ethics. pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/about/ethics Project Management Institute, Inc. (n.d.). Ethics Guidelines. pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/about/ethics/guidelines Project Management Institute, Inc. (n.d.). PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/ethics/pmi-code-of-ethics.pdf ==== |