Project Management Central

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
How Cynefin Framework determines project execution methodology?
Network:2648



Trying to find out how Cynefin framework tells us how to approach a set of different situations in project management methodology selection?
Sort By:
Network:6



Using Cynefin's basic 4 categories (but keeping things brief):
- obvious / simple - not typically warranting a project approach; very linear, direct cause and effect; example would be call center, FAQ's.
- complicated - the realm of most waterfall projects; expertise and analytic approaches are useful; cause and effect preserved. My opinion is presumes overall environment relatively static or predictably changing.
- complex - cause and effect obscured, or even absent; better to use an experimental approach (probe, sense, respond, in Snowden's terms); Agile or other iterative approaches more likely to succeed, or just not fail as badly. Pattern identification useful. My belief is overall environment dynamic, and less predictable,
- chaos - turbulent, no sense of predictability or perceived correlation, missing frames of reference for coherence.; well outside domain of project management, other than for very brief periods of exposure.
Network:1322



Pench -

While Cynefin or another other categorization framework can help to guide the decision-making process, there are many other variables which need to be considered when choosing the right lifecycle and practices for a given project including its scope, constraints and the EEF's surrounding the project.

Kiron

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Once, during prohibition, I was forced to live for days on nothing but food and water."

- W. C. Fields

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors