September 28 & 29, 2020 | Virtual
Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
People from Project Management Com read what is posted here. So your comment will be viewed.
I agree that the contrast is difficult on some screens.
Absolutely according to: "PMI should have remembered that the site users are stakeholders that needed consultation"
The purple color jumps out nicely, but the rendering of the text font is poor. Maybe it's the "glaring white canvas."
What is the important thing for you to participate? The interfce? Or the comments and answers that becomes into interactions?
UX is certainly an important component, but a, content is Sergio stated, content is still king. I understand where you're coming from though, as with some sites, there is an option for viewing using the new or old UI. PMI wanted to push the new brand. This was the direction they chose.
Honestly, I don't even remember what the old site looked like :)
I have to say there are some genuine accessibility issues here. Running the site through an accessibility tester has highlighted issues on contrast which users with impaired vision may struggle with.
I've sent a note to Marjorie regarding the concerns raised in this thread, so I'd expect she will respond shortly.
Thank you for your feedback. While there are no immediate plans to offer viewing options or allow users to view the site with the old branding, I'll pass along the feedback.
Please remember that this is the initial launch. Any accessibility issues will be logged and passed on to the team for consideration.
The interface, as part of the platform, would be the means to interact with the site, with the community, with other users.
Meanwhile, the comments and answers do becomes a way for the users to interact between them as much as debate and contribute to topics.
Please login or join to reply