September 28 & 29, 2020 | Virtual
Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
On the other hand...
For Sante to have created this publication is because the subject (in his perspective) was not well resolved.
And when a subject is not well resolved, it is not erasing that it is resolved
The topic created by Sante had more unfavorable responses to PMI rebranding ...
Coincidence of coincidences .... was what merged!
Speaking of fusion ... I would like to have the link that includes all the answers that were in the thread created by Sante
Can you put it here?
Where are these topics?
Can you put the link here?
In one thing Sante is right ...
Deleting a post interrupts the momentum of discussion ...
Whether we like it or not!
We're talking about topics created on social networks
Here is the question: Has this interruption been done intentionally?
Completely agree on the free speech aspect Sante. Context matters such as this thread and it’s valid in my opinion. In few years in future if I need to search topic I would not want to go through pages and pages in single topic it’s dreadful. We’ll end up like having those dreadful lengthy email chains.
Thank you Sante for voicing this rule for the community, much respected!
If we apply the same concept as wine, some over time tends to sour :-)
Please login or join to reply