Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
A couple things. First, I would recommend searching through the community for similar threads on this very topic. You will find several.
Additionally, it really just depends. What are your goals? Do you foresee your role changing to that of a Scrum Master?
The ACP is more of a generalist Agile certification.
Any Scrum Master certification (CSM, PSM) is specific to the role of Scrum Master.
These are two distinct things. You could certainly go for both as well! Hope that helps. Good Luck!
As @Andrew recommended please search for discussions on the matter due to you will find a lot. I personally was there.
If you already have your ACP, the only value in attaining the CSM would be if you are going filtered out by recruiters or hiring managers for roles you are applying to because you don't have it.
I'd also suggest that if you have your ACP, you would have to have had "some" agile experience, so rather than going for an entry-level certification like the CSM, if you want to stick with Scrum Alliance then go with one of their higher level certs like ACSM or CSP.
thank you for your help
I like your suggestion to do ACSM. However, I have checked online at scrum alliance website, for ACSM it says that applicant must have to complete the prerequisite of CSM.
Do you know if ACP fulfills the prerequisite for ACSM? I have searched on their website and could not find it.
As an alternative, you might want to consider Scrum.org's PSM series if you wish to demonstrate Scrum awareness. The PSM II is quite tricky...
The ACP wasn't designed to consider their CSP requirements, so it can't be substituted.
Back to your original question, the CSM may be worth earning if 1) you want a scrum master position, and 2) hiring managers in your area require it. If you are more focused on a career in project management, then the CSM is probably not worth earning. You'll already have the ACP.
Please login or join to reply