Project Management Central

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Topics: Agile, Business Analysis/Requirements Management, Construction
KPI: Assurance for Project's Completion
Network:345



Is the KPI the real measure to achieve quality and timely completion of the projects, if and only if will be taken seriously by the project team members and the management as well? What will be the shortcomings of implementing KPI, if any? Will it benefit the project?
Sort By:
Network:1305



Not all projects will have a KPI. Don't force one in just to have one.

Projects that should have a KPI defined in it will provide value. The stakeholders should sign-off on the objectives of the KPI's defined. The team should be serious to meet the objectives of the KPI's. When you achieve the goals of the KPI's you have validated the improvement made in the project.

As for completing a project on time the KPI's can be an indicator that the project will finish behind schedule if you cannot meet the objectives of the KPI's causing extra time to address the issues that prevent the achievement in meeting the KPI objectives.

Place your KPI's where you would place a project milestone. What good is a milestone if you have not truly validated the work up to that point with a KPI.
...
1 reply by Joefil Jocson
Mar 04, 2018 9:53 AM
Joefil Jocson
...
Am just wondering though if i can use a KPI debugged in a monthly basis instead of reviewing and assessing it bi-annually. The point is i want my project to be completed on time, and a real test of a detailed KPI which goals will be now be activities and task on a monthly target instead (aligned to its specific goals), say for example a KPI will mean , Completion of the Project A in 6 months, will be detailed and specific in a monthly KPI say Completion of the Project A in month 1 at 25%. Though challenging & tedious, will this be appropriate to achieve my targets?
Network:345



Mar 04, 2018 9:37 AM
Replying to Drake Settsu
...
Not all projects will have a KPI. Don't force one in just to have one.

Projects that should have a KPI defined in it will provide value. The stakeholders should sign-off on the objectives of the KPI's defined. The team should be serious to meet the objectives of the KPI's. When you achieve the goals of the KPI's you have validated the improvement made in the project.

As for completing a project on time the KPI's can be an indicator that the project will finish behind schedule if you cannot meet the objectives of the KPI's causing extra time to address the issues that prevent the achievement in meeting the KPI objectives.

Place your KPI's where you would place a project milestone. What good is a milestone if you have not truly validated the work up to that point with a KPI.
Am just wondering though if i can use a KPI debugged in a monthly basis instead of reviewing and assessing it bi-annually. The point is i want my project to be completed on time, and a real test of a detailed KPI which goals will be now be activities and task on a monthly target instead (aligned to its specific goals), say for example a KPI will mean , Completion of the Project A in 6 months, will be detailed and specific in a monthly KPI say Completion of the Project A in month 1 at 25%. Though challenging & tedious, will this be appropriate to achieve my targets?
...
1 reply by Drake Settsu
Mar 04, 2018 10:03 AM
Drake Settsu
...
I feel that breaking down the KPI measurement frequency into smaller units would be a safer route to get an accurate measurement on determining that you are on course to meet your deadline.
Network:1305



Mar 04, 2018 9:53 AM
Replying to Joefil Jocson
...
Am just wondering though if i can use a KPI debugged in a monthly basis instead of reviewing and assessing it bi-annually. The point is i want my project to be completed on time, and a real test of a detailed KPI which goals will be now be activities and task on a monthly target instead (aligned to its specific goals), say for example a KPI will mean , Completion of the Project A in 6 months, will be detailed and specific in a monthly KPI say Completion of the Project A in month 1 at 25%. Though challenging & tedious, will this be appropriate to achieve my targets?
I feel that breaking down the KPI measurement frequency into smaller units would be a safer route to get an accurate measurement on determining that you are on course to meet your deadline.
Network:11257



No the KPI alone is not the best measure of anything great. It's the metrics within the KPI if appropriate for the scenario you are measuring that makes it a good measure. When someone says "I have KPI's so I'm all good." that is when you need to take a closer look. These KPI's must be specifically tied to the success criteria of the project, or with the specific KPI's as mandated by management or the organization. I've seen some really silly KPI's that sound good, but mean nothing; nothing to the project that is, but maybe some obscure HR requirement for example.
Network:345



AGREE, Sante & Drake. NOW, i want a real test of making KPI with my employees/staff in a monthly basis se o let's see the result soon. Am planing to roll it out sometime June this year. Hoping for the best.
Network:11257



Remember to not overlook the importance of human KPI's. Projects are run by people, and unhappy people does not a good project make ;-)
Network:94761



Joefil,

KPI anywhere are good indicators, it doesn't represent everything. Many factors are not mesure by KPIs.
Network:703



Some great responses already.

I would echo Sante's point stating that the KPI must be tied to the success criteria of the project. If each criterion follows the SMART principle, then KPIs represent the "Measurable" segment of that acronym.

KPIs are important to give direction to the project team. This could be a drawback if the project team focuses rigidly on the KPIs and nothing else.

KPIs (and project success criteria) are all amenable to change. A major drawback is that these factors are not reviewed and revised when needed - often resulting in scenarios where projects end with irrelevant success criteria.

Also, KPIs which - by themselves - do not follow the SMART principle are of no help whatsoever. A simple statement that "The deliverables will have good quality" is not a KPI. A KPI would specify the tolerance rates of defects, the fit within normal deviations, and the time and cost of quality.

In short, KPIs are powerful weapons in the PM arsenal if wielded properly. If misused, then like unprotected dynamite, the have the power to blow a project up.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

I was going to have cosmetic surgery until I noticed that the doctor's office was full of portraits by Picasso.

- Rita Rudner

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors