The Quest for Good Governance: Building Better Sponsors
I recently met with the executive team of a public sector organization that was hoping to improve its project management capabilities. The problems they encountered with their projects certainly weren’t unfamiliar to many organizations--projects routinely ran late, over budget, were subject to constant and significant change, were under-resourced and frequently failed to deliver on their hoped for expectations.
Having taken the time to do an in-depth assessment of the organization, including interviewing project managers, team members and senior executives, however, a couple of conclusions became inescapably obvious. Firstly, even if they were to improve how project managers performed their role--through training, better process or templates--it wouldn’t make a difference to project performance. Secondly, this organization didn’t have a project management problem--it had a project governance problem.
The essence of this situation is that regardless of how project managers attempted to perform their role--and some had quite a capable track record--the organizational decision-making style completely co-opted the ability of any one person to get a project delivered well. Sponsors and executives in the organizations reserved the right to change priorities, shift expectations, starve projects for resources or ignore whole stakeholders in setting
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
ADVERTISEMENTS
|
"It isn't necessary to be rich and famous to be happy. It's only necessary to be rich." - Alan Alda |




