Governance Update: More Standards, Less Compliance
Once again it is time to take a look at the state of IT Governance to see what the last year has brought. Before jumping into what is new in the world of IG, it is always good to set forth a few definitions to ensure we are all on the same page; there are actually a number of definitions to consider. For example, Wikipedia defines IG as follows:
“Governance relates to consistent management, cohesive policies, guidance, processes and decision-rights for a given area of responsibility. For example, managing at a corporate level might involve evolving policies on privacy, on internal investment, and on the use of data.
Corporate governance consists of the set of processes, customs, policies, laws and institutions affecting the way people direct, administer or control a corporation.
Specifying the decision rights and accountability framework to encourage desirable behavior in the use of IT.”
And then there is the IT Governance Institute’s new Val IT definition, which goes like this:
“Guiding principles and supporting processes related to the evaluation and selection of IT-enabled business investments, and benefit realization and delivery of value from those investments.”
Both of these are a bit long winded. For my money I define IG this way: The process of overseeing and guiding how IT protects and secures investments in IT
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
|
"It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it." - Steven Wright |




