Why PMOs Should Start Measuring Project Performance Now
A previous boss asked me to implement project performance metrics. I had only just started the job as the new centralized Project Management Office (PMO) manager, and the unit's project management maturity was so low it was sub-zero. Documentation and plans were weak at best, and of the 45 or so projects (that I knew existed), only one had a schedule that was creatively documented in excel--and there were no signs of resource planning anywhere. There was also no attempt to manage project finances; instead, project costs were embedded in operational budgets, hidden to the project manager. How do you evaluate what doesn't exist?
I thought the idea of measuring performance was simply crazy. I was wrong.
What is crazy is a PMO not having a baseline to show the impact of improved project management starting from ground zero. How else can a PMO demonstrate value to the organization except by clearly illustrating project performance and successful outcomes as a result of process improvements? My boss might have been asking me to report project performance metrics, but by doing so, I am really reporting on the performance of my unit.
Unfortunately, when one is starting up a new PMO the idea of creating performance measures is often mistakenly farthest from the mind. I know I was worried about a lot of critical issues to solve and felt that my highest priority
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
|
"I never resist temptation, because I have found that things that are bad for me do not tempt me." - George Bernard Shaw |




