Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Do we focus on bookish knowledge of a PM or practical experience while taking up interviews

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
Yash Chopra Senior Project and Program Manager| Giesecke and Devrient India Private Limited New Delhi, Delhi, India
My experience of interview with an IT giant today:

Interview lasted 15 mins
The 2 gentlemen in the interview panel wanted answers based on the theoretical or bookish concepts whereas I answered on practical experience of managing projects. Learning from today's experience is that it is as important to "UNlearn" as it is to learn. Bookish knowledge is very imp in cracking interviews as you are evaluated on your bookish concepts. In practical not all bookish methodologies translate into practical world, as it varies from org to org. Had I focused on bookish rather than practical I would have cleared but does that make me a better Project Manager or suitable for the role?
There should be a fine balance between theory and practical and it is important for every one of us to understand that and realize that.
Any Inputs are welcome on this topic.
Sort By:
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Yash -

I've found most of the interviews I've been in to fall somewhere between the extremes of theory and "school of hard knocks". Interviewers want to know that you understand and appreciate the theory and can apply a disciplined approach to project management, but they also want to ensure that this application is grounded in practicality and pragmatism.

Kiron
avatar
Ganesan Balaji PMP, RMP, PgMP Lead| --- Tx, United States
It takes 2 hands to clap. Project management is not exact science and as you said it varies with org to org, industry to industry, depends on the project management maturity with in the organization as well as the involved individuals' maturity.
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Actually it is very tricky question. They want to hear about theory and systematic approach but more important how do you implement this theory and also what you did in the past .
avatar
Anish Abraham Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington Auburn, Wa, United States
In my opinion questions should be a mix of theory and practical experience, but if it's for a senior position then it could be just based on the experience.
avatar
Dinah Young Project Manager / Software Asset Manager| Prince William County Springfield, Va, United States
Maybe you should state the theory and follow up with how you would implement in real life.
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Depends who interviews you. Some people want high level and other want detail. And it is not usually based on their level of experience. Meaning of there is a very experienced PM, he usually talks high level and some details. I find it's the young ones, the up-and-comers, the ones who want to shine whi try to impress perhaps a third attendee that they know a lot, who drill down into theory to test you or trip you up. Nevertheless, it is good to be able to discuss both sides.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"When a stupid man is doing something he is ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty."

- George Bernard Shaw

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors