Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

What are type of contracts used in construction industry ? Why is that Turnkey contract is getting more and more implemented?

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
Prashant Shelke Senior General Manager| Brookfield Properties 410 210, Maharastra, India
Previously in projects there were various contract that were been used specially in the real estate industry ,but the trend is going more towards a Turnkey contract ?

Is a Turnkey contract not risky similar to a Head con model

What is the difference if any between a Turnkey contract and a Head con model contrac?
Sort By:
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Simply: the peace of mind of the owner

I won't say that Turnkey contract is taking over Design build contract ( I think it means the same of Head con)

It depends on industry and country.

The advantages of a turnkey project, some of which are misguiding and the opposite ends up happening:

1. Reduced total time during the contractual process by having just one process instead of two separate ones. This does not necessarily imply less construction time.
2. A seemingly “lower cost” when integrating “all” the elements under one provider.
3. Minimizing orders of change during the implementation of the project because the changes and adjustments fall under the responsibility of the only contractor.
4. This is a practical solution for smaller projects, such as communications rooms or small computer rooms, these usually have a limited budget for the project.
5. Definitely, the main advantage of this service is the peace of mind the owner gets when it hands over full responsibility of the project to “only one contractor”, it is much easier for the owner to manage and communicate with one provider, which means “one neck to choke”.


On the other hand, assuming that the company that makes the design does not have any conflict of interest in the implementation phase and expecting it to be really independent from the construction companies, the advantages of this “Design and construction” scheme, are as follows:

1. The disparity of the construction proposals is notably reduced. This is due to previous studies and designs. The amount of information available helps to limit risk, the scopes, specs and even the equipment needed is much more precise. In other words, construction bids can better map the needs and scope for the project, generating a clearer picture of the project itself.
2. This simplifies the provider decision-making process for the construction, having homogenous proposals that facilitate the “apples to apples” comparison and making the negotiation process a lot faster.
...
1 reply by Prashant Shelke
Nov 07, 2018 12:09 AM
Prashant Shelke
...
thanks for the reply
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
You can have a look at this whitepaper http://3ctcu0fgllb287ic8372r6e1bd4-wpengin...sadvantages.pdf
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
I am not sure this is the rornal name of those contracts but we either use Fixed Price Contracts when scope is very defined and the tendnecy for major changes is low. On the other hand, we use a type of contract in Canada called CCDC 5B which is construction management at risk. It is in a way Cost plus Management Fee but lots of risks are carried by the contractor and we normally adjust the supplementary conditions through an addendum and tailor them to suit each project and situation.
...
1 reply by Prashant Shelke
Nov 07, 2018 12:10 AM
Prashant Shelke
...
thansk for sharing the information
avatar
Prashant Shelke Senior General Manager| Brookfield Properties 410 210, Maharastra, India
May 04, 2018 6:42 AM
Replying to Kevin Drake
...
Simply: the peace of mind of the owner

I won't say that Turnkey contract is taking over Design build contract ( I think it means the same of Head con)

It depends on industry and country.

The advantages of a turnkey project, some of which are misguiding and the opposite ends up happening:

1. Reduced total time during the contractual process by having just one process instead of two separate ones. This does not necessarily imply less construction time.
2. A seemingly “lower cost” when integrating “all” the elements under one provider.
3. Minimizing orders of change during the implementation of the project because the changes and adjustments fall under the responsibility of the only contractor.
4. This is a practical solution for smaller projects, such as communications rooms or small computer rooms, these usually have a limited budget for the project.
5. Definitely, the main advantage of this service is the peace of mind the owner gets when it hands over full responsibility of the project to “only one contractor”, it is much easier for the owner to manage and communicate with one provider, which means “one neck to choke”.


On the other hand, assuming that the company that makes the design does not have any conflict of interest in the implementation phase and expecting it to be really independent from the construction companies, the advantages of this “Design and construction” scheme, are as follows:

1. The disparity of the construction proposals is notably reduced. This is due to previous studies and designs. The amount of information available helps to limit risk, the scopes, specs and even the equipment needed is much more precise. In other words, construction bids can better map the needs and scope for the project, generating a clearer picture of the project itself.
2. This simplifies the provider decision-making process for the construction, having homogenous proposals that facilitate the “apples to apples” comparison and making the negotiation process a lot faster.
thanks for the reply
avatar
Prashant Shelke Senior General Manager| Brookfield Properties 410 210, Maharastra, India
May 04, 2018 10:36 AM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
I am not sure this is the rornal name of those contracts but we either use Fixed Price Contracts when scope is very defined and the tendnecy for major changes is low. On the other hand, we use a type of contract in Canada called CCDC 5B which is construction management at risk. It is in a way Cost plus Management Fee but lots of risks are carried by the contractor and we normally adjust the supplementary conditions through an addendum and tailor them to suit each project and situation.
thansk for sharing the information
avatar
Anton Oosthuizen Senior Business Analyst / Project Manager| Self Employed Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
As Kevin said a turnkey solution provides peace of mind but at a cost. If you enter into a contract with a single vendor that will provide a turnkey solution you are putting all your eggs into one basket. There is less complexity as you do not have to manage a lot of stakeholders but if something goes wrong it goes horrible wrong. And also it would depend on the industry. In aviation for instance you won't find the concept of a turnkey solution since the market for the different components is just too niche and it is also way too risky.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"A doctor can bury his mistakes but an architect can only advise his client to plant vines."

- Frank Lloyd Wright

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors