Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Give an example of a win-win situation you negotiated

linkedin twitter facebook   Communications Management  
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
These type of example will enrich our experience.
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 >
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
Each day of my work life I am negotiating all related to new initiatives no matter I am program manager who is dealing with highly strategic initiatives (those that are critical to my actual work place survival). Beyond what you can name as "win-win" (I was trained in Harvard with William Ury) the only thing that works for me to create win-win situations is to demostrate to each person involved that they will be more rich with the solution than without the solution, where "rich" it does not mean more money in some cases.
...
1 reply by Kevin Drake
May 28, 2018 4:53 PM
Kevin Drake
...
Excellent approach and Interesting
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
May 28, 2018 3:00 PM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
Each day of my work life I am negotiating all related to new initiatives no matter I am program manager who is dealing with highly strategic initiatives (those that are critical to my actual work place survival). Beyond what you can name as "win-win" (I was trained in Harvard with William Ury) the only thing that works for me to create win-win situations is to demostrate to each person involved that they will be more rich with the solution than without the solution, where "rich" it does not mean more money in some cases.
Excellent approach and Interesting
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
May 28, 2018 10:42 AM
Replying to Anish Abraham
...
Recently we negotiated with our new vendor to modify the licensing model for our enterprise wide cloud based healthcare application, so that it will allow more users to log into the system at the same time. We told them that the current model is not feasible, and at the same time we don't have money to pay for more licenses. We provided examples of various licensing models from their competitors ,and finally the vendor decided to increase the user licenses free of cost. Now, the stakeholders are very happy with this new contract.
I wonder why existing customers do not get enough care as much as the new customer unless we negotiate
avatar
Kat Chartier Technical Project Manager| Axonius Federal Systems Virginia, United States
May 06, 2018 7:46 PM
Replying to Ruba Amarin
...
Win-win doesn't have to be 50% for each negotiating side. I have recently negotiated with another company that holds a prime contract an agreement to extend the contract, where my firm serves as a subcontractor. I knew ahead of getting into the negotiation that they are not in favor of continuing since the money is too small for them. For my firm, we badly needed this contract because we want to build our qualification in a certain geographic area. I had no other alternative that would make my case strong, but I tried as hard as I can to make an appealing case for them and I took some of the administrative work from their plate which made sense for them by the end of the day. So they walked out with a nice profit margin, while I have a guaranteed extension for another 18 months.

Doing your homework ahead of time is really beneficial. Understanding the other side's situation can help a lot in negotiation.
I think a win-win situation in terms of negotiation is not at all 50% for each negotiating side. A true win-win is when both parties get 100% of what they want, and it is possible. Since I come primarily from a retail management background, a clear win-win situation that I've personally encountered involved two competing manufacturers who were fighting for a limited quantity textile resource. The total quantity was 100 units and both parties needed all 100 units for their production requirements and either one is willing to give up.

Upon further investigation, which included a thorough understanding of each party's needs (EXTREMELY IMPORTANT! it's not all about being aggressive and dominant nor being too compromising) they found out Manufacturer A needed only the outer fringe detail bordering the material and Manufacturer B only needed the inner part of the material.

They ended up getting 100% of what they wanted out of the negotiation and more importantly, forged a long-lasting business relationship with each other.
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Kevin,

Win-win is achieved when both parties are satisfied and don't feel cheated. To achieve maximum result for your part and get the other "happy". You need to understand the context of both sides, what are the limits what is acceptable.

Cost reduction could be an interesting negotiation point for both parties if the schedule allows for usage of a low demand period for execution.
...
1 reply by Kevin Drake
May 29, 2018 6:42 AM
Kevin Drake
...
Very true
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
What is mostly forgotten is this: win-win or any other situation that you will take into account is a matter of feeling at the end of the negotiation. Obviously, each part into the negotiation take a tactic and strategy driven by the culture of the organization mainly. But at the end the first thing is how each part feeling. No matter that, when all end (in fact, it never end) a review is made but when people made the review they will find a lot related if they achiteved the objectives or not.
...
1 reply by Kevin Drake
May 29, 2018 6:41 AM
Kevin Drake
...
I strongly agree with you
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
May 29, 2018 5:30 AM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
What is mostly forgotten is this: win-win or any other situation that you will take into account is a matter of feeling at the end of the negotiation. Obviously, each part into the negotiation take a tactic and strategy driven by the culture of the organization mainly. But at the end the first thing is how each part feeling. No matter that, when all end (in fact, it never end) a review is made but when people made the review they will find a lot related if they achiteved the objectives or not.
I strongly agree with you
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
May 28, 2018 11:06 PM
Replying to Vincent Guerard
...
Kevin,

Win-win is achieved when both parties are satisfied and don't feel cheated. To achieve maximum result for your part and get the other "happy". You need to understand the context of both sides, what are the limits what is acceptable.

Cost reduction could be an interesting negotiation point for both parties if the schedule allows for usage of a low demand period for execution.
Very true
...
1 reply by Vincent Guerard
May 30, 2018 11:16 AM
Vincent Guerard
...
Understanding of both parties interest
avatar
Thomas Walenta Global Project Economy Expert Hackenheim, Germany
Good question to reflect on , Kevin.

First, if there is a win-win outcome is rather a matter of perception on each side than a measure of facts. Sergio’s point is well taken. Consider you being in a bazaar in Instanbul, trying to buy a gold bracelet. It is offered to you for 100, you manage to get it for 30 but it is worth only 5. Rationally, you lost 25, but emotionally you won by 70.

Second, win-win is based on a non-zero-sum game, so I agree with Kathrine, win-win is rather 100-100 than 50-50. 50-50 I rather see as a compromise, a loose-loose outcome.

Third, the timeframe is important for which you assess the outcome. For short term, transactional business, win-win will be a different outcome than for a longterm, strategic and relationships based environment (think US vs China). A quick win might be catastrophic in the long term and strategic thinkers will accept short-term losses for the longterm sustainable win.
...
2 replies by Kat Chartier and Riyadh Salih
May 29, 2018 12:53 PM
Kat Chartier
...
Well said, Thomas. I completely agree on all points raised. Win-win situations are not always easy to achieve but is an outcome that i always aspire for when I go into negotiations.
May 29, 2018 2:06 PM
Riyadh Salih
...
Thomas, your explanation is good I just wonder why the example of Bazaar in Istanbul has to mention certain city in particular for bad action, I think we should refrain from prejudice, racism, antagonism directed against someone of different race or city considering the past how Turkey sided Germany to help their needs ( Ottoman - German Alliance) and over 3 millions Turkish contributing positively in German economy.
avatar
Muhammad Awais Project and Delivery Manager| Wyndham STEM Stars Melbourne, Vic, Australia
I have lot of examples related to projects involving partners as part of digital transformation that put us in difficult and challenging situations to ensure integrity of the pilot projects as well as potential customers in line. At one stage, we had to offer revenue sharing our 5% to one of the IoT AI providers to ensure their investment and funding for pilot projects of they succeed and win the mission critical clients through our proposed solution portfolio. that was the point where uncertainty was blooming due to changes in the executive cadres and partner being risk averse wanted assurity in the contracting terms for a long term win win for both.
< 1 2 3 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"A statesman is an easy man, he tells his lies by rote. A journalist invents his lies and rams them down your throat. So stay at home and drink your beer and let the neighbors vote!"

- W.B. Yeats

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors