Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Project Size

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
NEHRU NAGAPPAN PM Consultant| Project Leadership Academy Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Are there any guidelines on how to determine SIZE of a project (e.g. Small, Med, Large)? What are the criteria used to determine this?
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Nehru -

Size is less critical when assessing projects than complexity, but if you really do want to come up with some guidelines for a subjective taxonomy like small/medium/large, you'd want to consider a combination of cost, duration and/or number of stakeholders or resources.

Kiron
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
Up to date in my personal experience, while you could find lot of documentation outside there, it depends on the organization you are working today. Each organization has its own method that could depends on risk, budget mostly.
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
It is a very relative thing, however, I use quantitive method usually with weighting to

CALCULATING PROJECT SIZE FACTORS:

1. Total Cost
2. Team Size
3. Risk
4. Complexity
5. Impact
6. Strategic Priority
7. Elapsed time
8. Timeframe
9. Reputation importance
10. Level of Change
11. Dependency and interdependency projects

You can build a framework and fix it for all the projects in the organisation or you can use the flexible calculation in according to your strategic priorities.

We give weight out of 100% for each of the 11 factors ( these are my factors, you might pick only 10)

Now each factor you divide into 3 categories Small =1, Medium = 2 and Large = 3 and you decide the size and tolerance of each.

We calculate each and add them up, your minimum is 11 very small project and 33 very large and complex and you have the spectrum in between.


On the other hand, do not forget to use the weighting system from 100% that we spoke about in the beginning, so you can have the full picture in according to your changeable strategic needs.

You will end up with great matrix and then every project you have, you can test it in according to that.



Kevin Drake
...
6 replies by Alok Priyadarshi, Anish Abraham, Rami Kaibni, Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD, Scott Wegler, and Vincent Guerard
May 14, 2018 9:07 AM
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
That's a pretty comprehensive list Kevin :-)
May 14, 2018 10:26 AM
Rami Kaibni
...
Great list Kevin. Cheers !
May 14, 2018 10:56 AM
Anish Abraham
...
Good one, Kevin and thanks for sharing.
May 14, 2018 3:17 PM
Scott Wegler
...
Wonderful quantitative analysis - I will utilize a few of your factors in my own assessment of project size.
May 16, 2018 11:55 AM
Vincent Guerard
...
Kevin,

Great list of factors. I would add one, Industry/domain.

Large in software might not be large in construction. I was once in an organization that covers those two fields.
May 16, 2018 12:39 PM
Alok Priyadarshi
...
Very informative and useful.
Thanks a lot Kevin.
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
May 14, 2018 7:00 AM
Replying to Kevin Drake
...
It is a very relative thing, however, I use quantitive method usually with weighting to

CALCULATING PROJECT SIZE FACTORS:

1. Total Cost
2. Team Size
3. Risk
4. Complexity
5. Impact
6. Strategic Priority
7. Elapsed time
8. Timeframe
9. Reputation importance
10. Level of Change
11. Dependency and interdependency projects

You can build a framework and fix it for all the projects in the organisation or you can use the flexible calculation in according to your strategic priorities.

We give weight out of 100% for each of the 11 factors ( these are my factors, you might pick only 10)

Now each factor you divide into 3 categories Small =1, Medium = 2 and Large = 3 and you decide the size and tolerance of each.

We calculate each and add them up, your minimum is 11 very small project and 33 very large and complex and you have the spectrum in between.


On the other hand, do not forget to use the weighting system from 100% that we spoke about in the beginning, so you can have the full picture in according to your changeable strategic needs.

You will end up with great matrix and then every project you have, you can test it in according to that.



Kevin Drake
That's a pretty comprehensive list Kevin :-)
avatar
Abolfazl Yousefi Darestani Manager, Quality and Continuous Improvement| Hörmann-TNR Industrial Doors Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
it has to do with the industry you work in. A project in a IT may be considered as big in terms of cost, budget, etc. while the same in construction is considered small.
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
May 14, 2018 7:00 AM
Replying to Kevin Drake
...
It is a very relative thing, however, I use quantitive method usually with weighting to

CALCULATING PROJECT SIZE FACTORS:

1. Total Cost
2. Team Size
3. Risk
4. Complexity
5. Impact
6. Strategic Priority
7. Elapsed time
8. Timeframe
9. Reputation importance
10. Level of Change
11. Dependency and interdependency projects

You can build a framework and fix it for all the projects in the organisation or you can use the flexible calculation in according to your strategic priorities.

We give weight out of 100% for each of the 11 factors ( these are my factors, you might pick only 10)

Now each factor you divide into 3 categories Small =1, Medium = 2 and Large = 3 and you decide the size and tolerance of each.

We calculate each and add them up, your minimum is 11 very small project and 33 very large and complex and you have the spectrum in between.


On the other hand, do not forget to use the weighting system from 100% that we spoke about in the beginning, so you can have the full picture in according to your changeable strategic needs.

You will end up with great matrix and then every project you have, you can test it in according to that.



Kevin Drake
Great list Kevin. Cheers !
...
1 reply by Kevin Drake
May 14, 2018 10:47 AM
Kevin Drake
...
You should see my excel sheet about it..
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
May 14, 2018 10:26 AM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
Great list Kevin. Cheers !
You should see my excel sheet about it..
...
2 replies by Pafoua her and Rami Kaibni
May 14, 2018 10:53 AM
Rami Kaibni
...
You should put it on PMI as template.
May 14, 2018 10:58 AM
Pafoua her
...
May I have a copy of your excel sheet?
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
May 14, 2018 10:47 AM
Replying to Kevin Drake
...
You should see my excel sheet about it..
You should put it on PMI as template.
avatar
Anish Abraham Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington Auburn, Wa, United States
May 14, 2018 7:00 AM
Replying to Kevin Drake
...
It is a very relative thing, however, I use quantitive method usually with weighting to

CALCULATING PROJECT SIZE FACTORS:

1. Total Cost
2. Team Size
3. Risk
4. Complexity
5. Impact
6. Strategic Priority
7. Elapsed time
8. Timeframe
9. Reputation importance
10. Level of Change
11. Dependency and interdependency projects

You can build a framework and fix it for all the projects in the organisation or you can use the flexible calculation in according to your strategic priorities.

We give weight out of 100% for each of the 11 factors ( these are my factors, you might pick only 10)

Now each factor you divide into 3 categories Small =1, Medium = 2 and Large = 3 and you decide the size and tolerance of each.

We calculate each and add them up, your minimum is 11 very small project and 33 very large and complex and you have the spectrum in between.


On the other hand, do not forget to use the weighting system from 100% that we spoke about in the beginning, so you can have the full picture in according to your changeable strategic needs.

You will end up with great matrix and then every project you have, you can test it in according to that.



Kevin Drake
Good one, Kevin and thanks for sharing.
avatar
Pafoua her Kansas City, Ks, United States
May 14, 2018 10:47 AM
Replying to Kevin Drake
...
You should see my excel sheet about it..
May I have a copy of your excel sheet?
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

Work like you don't need the money, love like you've never been hurt, and dance like there's nobody watching.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors