Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Minimizing risk by inserting computer chips

linkedin twitter facebook   Risk Management  
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Once we all get computer chips placed inside our bodies in the future, and also each resource and asset around us, do you think it will be easier to minimize risk in projects?
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 >
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jun 08, 2018 1:11 PM
Replying to Joshua Render
...
It depends, do we get a remote control to shock people who fail us?
Exactly, in a dictator's hands, or even perhaps a democratic society's law enforcement option to neutralize/immobilize antagonists or law breakers.
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jun 08, 2018 1:15 PM
Replying to Riyadh Salih
...
Sante, you will really be exposed as your key stakeholders can easily track your steps :-)
Yes Riyadh, tracking is part of the chip's pros, and cons.
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jun 08, 2018 3:22 PM
Replying to Drew Craig
...
While you may be reducing risks in some areas, there will be new risks to account for, as eluded to in other comments I see. Plus, a new round of excuses - It's not my fault, I must have been hacked! Or I could just blame it on my wife - Philadelphia sports story inside joke. Rami will understand :)
Andrew, certainly chip malfunction will be used as an excuse in a propaganda exercise.
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jun 08, 2018 4:04 PM
Replying to Meade Rubenstein
...
I tried this with potato chips and it had no significant project risk impact
haha my favorite!
avatar
Kevin Drake Perth, Western Australia, Australia
I think you are reducing risk from one side and increasing risk on other side
...
1 reply by Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
Jun 09, 2018 2:18 AM
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
Agreed, a double-edged sword Kevin.
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jun 09, 2018 1:38 AM
Replying to Kevin Drake
...
I think you are reducing risk from one side and increasing risk on other side
Agreed, a double-edged sword Kevin.
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Jun 08, 2018 10:11 PM
Replying to Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
At first yes by choice. Unfortunately, at some point, it will be mandatory and done at birth. It won't stop innovation, because the brain is responsible for that, not unless AI gets to a point where it controls certain sections of the brain (ie. vision, hearing, emotions) and that is also coming to a lab near you, way into the future.
Will there be upgrade or updates? :-)

Will it require to reboot?
...
1 reply by Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
Jun 10, 2018 11:59 PM
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
Both Vincent ;-)
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jun 10, 2018 10:31 PM
Replying to Vincent Guerard
...
Will there be upgrade or updates? :-)

Will it require to reboot?
Both Vincent ;-)
< 1 2 3 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there.

- Will Rogers

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors