Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Risk response strategy for Residual risk

linkedin twitter facebook   Risk Management  
avatar
Moloy Chakraborty Principal Project Manager| WSP UK LTD High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
When is separate Risk response strategy required for Residual Risk?
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Petar Radulov Vienna, Austria
no, because they remain after risk response was already implemented, and are usually accepted
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Residual risk, by default, has the separate risk response strategy of acceptance. So we could have taken a transfer, mitigate or avoid response with a particular negative risk and whatever risk exposure remains after is accepted.

Kiron
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
I totally agree with Kiron and can't add more to that. Those risks for sure has a separate response strategy to address them should they occur.
avatar
Tamer Zeyad Sadiq Assistant Cost Manager| Turner & Townsend Riyadh, Ar Riyad, Saudi Arabia
As Kiron said, the residual risk is coming after risk response implement as per shown in project documents update then it will be updated in risk register and go to procees planning again as per PMBOK!!!
avatar
Petar Radulov Vienna, Austria
After risk response strategy was implemented there could be two types of risks - residual and secondary. Residual are expected/known and should have been considered in the initial strategy but secondary risks will require new strategy.
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
I agree with Rajesh, but he isn't here! ;-)
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Aug 29, 2018 10:17 AM
Rami Kaibni
...
Good One :-)
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Aug 29, 2018 6:29 AM
Replying to Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
I agree with Rajesh, but he isn't here! ;-)
Good One :-)
avatar
Moloy Chakraborty Principal Project Manager| WSP UK LTD High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
Thanks, everyone for the explanation

Hi Petar,
Residual Risks are those risks which remain after the planned responses of risk have been taken and Secondary Risks are those risks which arise as a direct result of implementing a risk Response

Hence Risk response strategy will only prepare for the new risk (Secondary Risks) and not for Residual Risks that is as per PMBOK but what is the good practice in the real project?

Is there follow the same ??
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Moloy,

You should review the impact of risk response on regular basis. Progress in the project may add or remove risk, and your risk response may impact differently over time. creating new residual risk or secondary risk.
avatar
Petar Radulov Vienna, Austria
I don't think there could be definite answer about the residual risks. It may be depends on the project type, industry, complexity, etc.
In my projects, residual risks are accepted with allocated contingency reserve, and have low impact and probability, and I don't do anything more due to resource constraints :-(
A good practice is may be to review them from time to time but this always depends on the resources PM has available to handle risks :-)
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Karate is a form of martial arts in which people who have had years and years of training can, using only their hands and feet, make some of the worst movies in the history of the world."

- Dave Barry

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors