Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

What is the biggest challenge your organization or current client faces with benefits realization?

linkedin twitter facebook   Benefits Realization   Strategy  
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Having skimmed over the new BRM practice guide from PMI, I thought it might be interesting to start a discussion thread on the blockers to realizing benefits from projects.

So when you think about your current client or organization, what is the biggest impediment to realizing benefits from projects?

For example, is it one or more of the following?

a) Lack of formal project justification via a business case or similar artifact
b) Benefits are not objectively identified in the business case
c) No one takes ownership for tracking & monitoring benefit realization during and after the project
d) There is no consequence for a business owner not realizing the benefits
e) Project delivery itself is poor so the outputs of projects rarely are delivered within expected constraints

What other causes might there be?
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
f) all of the above.

Sadly, I have seen all of these and inhibitors in any type of BR.

Executive wakes up one day with a great idea, makes a phone call, project starts, takes priority over all others, project is eventually (maybe) delivered, never used and no one outside of the team knows it exists
avatar
Steve Ratkaj Ontario, Canada
Jan 23, 2020 2:59 PM
Replying to Stéphane Parent
...
Benefits are realized much later after the project closes. While the performance indicators are managed by a unit, the project team is disbanded and nowhere to be found.
Stéphane;

I would tend to agree in most cases your statement is correct, with our strategic initiative which we are treating as a project, I can say there are almost "immediate" or what could be called intermediate benefits.
As an example, within our organization, PMs, and their associated budgets must also include all costs pertaining to training of their staff. A properly written BRP, would encapsulate this HR component of the project staff's career objectives, as beginning of year objectives, mid-year, and year-end reviews are conducted.
Additionally, "internal benefits" could be measured using the traditional metrics of time, cost, scope, and quality throughout the entire project lifecycle.
Think of an organization such as ours with literally hundreds of projects. Would senior management not want to know of the "internal benefits" that should be "realized" during all project stages?
I believe this component of PM has largely been ignored, but there seems to be a resurgence in this area, and for very good reason.
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
This is hilarious - my post was originally written a year back and has garnered more responses this week than it did back then :-)

Talk about a re-energized necropost!
avatar
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Lack of adaptation to a changing environment, thus failing to identify dynamic value streams and adapt the project accordingly (including project cancellation).
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Never hold discussions with the monkey when the organ grinder is in the room."

- Winston Churchill

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors