Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Identifying and tracking dependencies across multiple scrum teams working

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile   Risk Management   Scrum  
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Would like to hear experiences from community members on identifying and tracking dependencies across multiple scrum teams. We can all agree that if a dependency is identified in the current sprint, then it is too late. How can we capture dependencies earlier?
Sort By:
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
In my case, along the years, it will be solved thanks the use of a role which is solution accountable: the business analyst. On the other side, that will be solve by using something that is critical mainly in Agile: systemic theory applied to organizations. That is the macro but you need the tools and practices to do that. In this case, there are lot of tools (any type of tools, not software only) outside there that could help you. In my actual work place I was in charge "to sell" this way of work.
...
1 reply by Drew Craig
Mar 24, 2019 11:37 AM
Drew Craig
...
Thanks, Sergio. Yes, great points. It is solely not software related, but having the right individuals involved to drive and influence the efforts and actions.

In my scenario, I have done such that. Ensured the BA's are involved and integral to the process.
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Andrew -

that is the benefit of story mapping (early in the life of the project/release) and look ahead modeling.

The former will give teams a chance to start to identify the connections between work items whereas the latter will give them a chance to further explore those dependencies in advance of when they would bring the work items into a sprint. In fact, for most of our teams, their DoR includes "key dependencies identified and planned for".

Kiron
...
1 reply by Drew Craig
Mar 24, 2019 11:45 AM
Drew Craig
...
Thanks, Kiron. I love that inclusion into DoR. I have set up some cross-team activities, but I am absolutely going to suggest that and discuss incorporating into our working agreement. Thanks!
avatar
Keith Novak Tukwila, Wa, United States
Andrew,
This is where I use my own basic network diagram as a tool whether or not anyone else cares I'm creating them. Forcing myself to diagram a problem at a high level requires significant thinking about it to in order to create that basic abstract. When there are multiple story-lines running concurrently, I am all for creating a map of their planned intersections. It's far easier to follow the plot.

Keith
...
1 reply by Drew Craig
Mar 24, 2019 11:48 AM
Drew Craig
...
Great points, Keith. A visual representation of features, stories, and dependencies would be absolutely valuable. I would like to try to incorporate that a bit more. Diagrams seem to be not given their due! As of now, we highlight through linking in the tool. That way either team will see the link, whether a predecessor or successor.
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Mar 17, 2019 9:39 AM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
In my case, along the years, it will be solved thanks the use of a role which is solution accountable: the business analyst. On the other side, that will be solve by using something that is critical mainly in Agile: systemic theory applied to organizations. That is the macro but you need the tools and practices to do that. In this case, there are lot of tools (any type of tools, not software only) outside there that could help you. In my actual work place I was in charge "to sell" this way of work.
Thanks, Sergio. Yes, great points. It is solely not software related, but having the right individuals involved to drive and influence the efforts and actions.

In my scenario, I have done such that. Ensured the BA's are involved and integral to the process.
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Mar 17, 2019 10:27 AM
Replying to Kiron Bondale
...
Andrew -

that is the benefit of story mapping (early in the life of the project/release) and look ahead modeling.

The former will give teams a chance to start to identify the connections between work items whereas the latter will give them a chance to further explore those dependencies in advance of when they would bring the work items into a sprint. In fact, for most of our teams, their DoR includes "key dependencies identified and planned for".

Kiron
Thanks, Kiron. I love that inclusion into DoR. I have set up some cross-team activities, but I am absolutely going to suggest that and discuss incorporating into our working agreement. Thanks!
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Mar 17, 2019 11:47 PM
Replying to Keith Novak
...
Andrew,
This is where I use my own basic network diagram as a tool whether or not anyone else cares I'm creating them. Forcing myself to diagram a problem at a high level requires significant thinking about it to in order to create that basic abstract. When there are multiple story-lines running concurrently, I am all for creating a map of their planned intersections. It's far easier to follow the plot.

Keith
Great points, Keith. A visual representation of features, stories, and dependencies would be absolutely valuable. I would like to try to incorporate that a bit more. Diagrams seem to be not given their due! As of now, we highlight through linking in the tool. That way either team will see the link, whether a predecessor or successor.
avatar
RAJESH K L Project Manager, PMP| Bharat Electronics, Bengaluru, India Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Visualisation tools including GANT charts help in quickly identifying dependencies

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

I've never heard of a relationship being affected by punctuation.

- Jerry Seinfeld

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors