Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Challenge/penalty of being ethically correct!!

linkedin twitter facebook   Communications Management   Ethics  
avatar
Dr. Deepa Bhide Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Mary was a project manager for a leading project in a large enterprise. She was known to be practical and process-oriented and even more so when it came to understanding ethical dimensions of the project. This was a hallmark of her way of working and her team felt comfortable in her leadership. She had also been upfront in her communication to the leadership on her approach to some difficult project situations.

A recent event had disturbed this harmony though. Her actions were questioned by the senior management for one particular decision that she took in the keeping the ethical values of the project held high.

She felt that the senior management was not able to understand her point of view and that they were looking only at the financial and business value of the project.

Mary has tendered her resignation to the management and is about to inform her team.

Would love to know your thoughts....
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 >
avatar
Alankar Karpe Project and program management, Speaker and mentor | Wipro Bangalore, India
I think what Mary did was for her own satisfaction and good sleep. Its better to be high in one's own eyes
avatar
Valerie Denney Associate Professor| Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- Worldwide Cleveland, Sc, United States
I enjoyed this discussion post. Mary had a decision to make. Standing your ground and acting on what you believe is not always easy. Ethics is not free. There are consequences to not acting appropriately, but there might be consequences for doing the right thing. In this case, perhaps Mary was out of a job, BUT... and it is a big but.... she knows she did the right thing for the right reason. I only hope that Mary took the time to clearly communicate her disagreement and WHY. Changing an ethical culture takes time and effort.
avatar
Valerie Denney Associate Professor| Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- Worldwide Cleveland, Sc, United States
Nov 04, 2019 3:15 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
Interesting your question
Thanks for sharing

Does the company Mary works for have an explicit code of ethics?

Are people when they start working for the company aware of the principles of the code of ethics?
And you know you have to respect the code of ethics?

If the persons are not governed by the company's code of ethics, what are the consequences?

Is there an ethics committee that appreciates decisions, behaviors and attitudes about non-compliance with the code of ethics?

What kind of decisions has been made by the ethics committee (jurisprupence)?

Against the background of the answers to these questions, Mary can decide what to do.

I am convinced that there are only three possible outputs:

- Leave company, project and team

- Remain in the company and do nothing

- Remain in the company and submit this situation to the Ethics Committee
Luis, I love your analysis. There are almost always options. Often individuals don't take the time to think through the alternatives. What are the pros and cons? benefits and consequences? A tool such as the PMI Ethical Decision Making Framework (EDMF) can help.

https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/...g-framework.pdf
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
Nov 10, 2019 3:22 PM
Replying to Eric Simms
...
Mary was wise. It might be tempting for Mary to act unethically, perhaps believing the executives will reward her unethical behavior on their behalf with a promotion. However, leaders who do not prize ethical behavior cannot be trusted. They will happily reap the benefits of Mary’s actions (perhaps they will receive bigger bonuses), but if there are any legal repercussions for Mary’s actions the executives will decry Mary as an untrustworthy employee and loudly claim they had no knowledge of her actions.
I have worked with leadership like this, so I'm quite familiar with the thoughts of such individuals. The best course of action is to leave an organization like that as soon as possible.
And yet there are a lot of executives - and individual contributors! - who value someone taking the blame for a higher up. It's hard to understand why we should applaud the ethically-prudent paying for the ethically-challenged.
< 1 2 3 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock."

- Will Rogers

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors