What do you think of the new R.E.P. Program?

Dear Rami
Thank you for participating in this reflection and for your opinion.

I fully understand that PMI is interested in the people giving training ensuring the minimum quality of preparation

Is the exam not selective enough?

When a person enrolls in the exam, he or she shares with PMI where they took the preparation course.

Is the treatment of these data not sufficient to audit the REP's with the highest failure rate?

Simply use the technology

Is this yet another way to help PMI's coffers or a real initiative to ensure the training must at least meet the minimum quality standard?

If it's the later, how can you gauge a trainer's quality of delivery except to see them in action, and pose questions during delivery to see how the open ended questions are responded to as a show of competence?

How much time to test the trainers, number of questions to asked, who are qualified to be examiners/testers.

The current REP systems control bring little value to assure the public of PMI contribution. A check of REP handouts is nothing.It may be good but it is the individuals conducting the training that matters and many are truly lacking in terms of knowledge, exposure and biz skills to even understand what they teach. Unless competency tested, the decay in quality education will continue.

Spot on. REP submit their best trainers training materials but use the cheepest resource to do the training and who can blame them.

Is PMI truly non-profit oriented? Show us how you are doing and maintaining that !