Justus NScrum Master| BCBSTXArlington, Tx, United States
I completely agree with what Andrew Craig stated above. For me personally, if i could only have one then i would go for the PMI-ACP over the other. Saving Changes...
Scrum is a method used partially or wholly by over 60% of organizations claiming to follow agile approaches (as per the last State of Agile survey).
Given this, from a marketing perspective, an SM designation (not the CSM, as it proves only that you took a 2 day course and passed a test) such as one of the higher Scrum Alliance or PSM certifications is valuable.
However, from a versatility perspective, the ACP would be better.
Not to muddy the waters, but PMI's DALSM will likely supercede both of these at some point as it covers not only "small" agile but "enterprise" agile...
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Dec 27, 2019 4:36 AM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
Rami, Agile is not a mindset. Agile, by definition, is a way of thinking and behave with focus in client, value and quality. People think that is a mindset because somebody stated that and the PMI took that definition. The person who stated that created it making a deduction from the Manifesto for Agile Software Development. The Agile definition implies that organizational architecture must be taken into account. If people go to 1990 definitions then they will see the reference architecture plus other things related to that.
Sergio
Thanks for your elaboration. What you actually mentioned above “ is a way of thinking and behave” is actually the definition of a Mindset.
I do not normally take what others mention blindly so it’s not because PMI mentioned it’s a mindset, I am saying it is a mindset. I truly believe it is.
Being Agile itself, in my opinion, is a mindset. Agile Management probably includes all definitions you mentioned.
RK
...
1 reply by Sergio Luis Conte
Dec 28, 2019 6:30 AM
Sergio Luis Conte
...
Sorry but is not the definition of mindset. Mindset is about a way of thinking. The defintion of Agile is more specific and boarder: is a way of thinking and behave with focus on client, value and quality. That´s critical to understand if organizations do not want to fail when they try to use Agile. Organizations must take critical decisions like define "client" and with that on hand they can define "value" and "quality". Besides that they have to transform themself to create an environment to help on way of behave where culture is the critical componet. That is the real transformation taken the systemic theory as the basement. On the other side, which thing related to an approach is not a mindset? So, the worst thing people can do is to think that Agile approach is a mindset. The PMI has failed on that taken the Manifesto for Software Development as the driver. My perception the PMI is the way to change that thanks to adhere or change the direction and take DAD as the driver right now. That´s in general. In the specific I hope the PMI will not take again Agile like a software especific approach only as it did in the past editions.
Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
Dec 27, 2019 11:57 AM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
Sergio
Thanks for your elaboration. What you actually mentioned above “ is a way of thinking and behave” is actually the definition of a Mindset.
I do not normally take what others mention blindly so it’s not because PMI mentioned it’s a mindset, I am saying it is a mindset. I truly believe it is.
Being Agile itself, in my opinion, is a mindset. Agile Management probably includes all definitions you mentioned.
RK
Sorry but is not the definition of mindset. Mindset is about a way of thinking. The defintion of Agile is more specific and boarder: is a way of thinking and behave with focus on client, value and quality. That´s critical to understand if organizations do not want to fail when they try to use Agile. Organizations must take critical decisions like define "client" and with that on hand they can define "value" and "quality". Besides that they have to transform themself to create an environment to help on way of behave where culture is the critical componet. That is the real transformation taken the systemic theory as the basement. On the other side, which thing related to an approach is not a mindset? So, the worst thing people can do is to think that Agile approach is a mindset. The PMI has failed on that taken the Manifesto for Software Development as the driver. My perception the PMI is the way to change that thanks to adhere or change the direction and take DAD as the driver right now. That´s in general. In the specific I hope the PMI will not take again Agile like a software especific approach only as it did in the past editions.
...
2 replies by Kiron Bondale and Rami Kaibni
Dec 28, 2019 9:34 AM
Kiron Bondale
...
Sergio -
I don't think Rami is stating agile is ONLY about mindset. However, simply implementing a different way of working without corresponding changing in how we think is a recipe for "Dark Scrum" or "Doing Agile".
I'd agree that we can't think our way to a new way of working but rather need to work our way to a new way of thinking, but there is definitely a mindset "shift" required for all key stakeholders involved with value delivery to achieve the benefits of increased agility.
Kiron
Dec 28, 2019 3:17 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Sergio
You are misinterpreting what I am trying to explain. Please refer to Kiron's feedback to your statement.
I definitely am not stating that Agile is only about mindset but it's important to recognize the need in a mindset shift.
Sorry but is not the definition of mindset. Mindset is about a way of thinking. The defintion of Agile is more specific and boarder: is a way of thinking and behave with focus on client, value and quality. That´s critical to understand if organizations do not want to fail when they try to use Agile. Organizations must take critical decisions like define "client" and with that on hand they can define "value" and "quality". Besides that they have to transform themself to create an environment to help on way of behave where culture is the critical componet. That is the real transformation taken the systemic theory as the basement. On the other side, which thing related to an approach is not a mindset? So, the worst thing people can do is to think that Agile approach is a mindset. The PMI has failed on that taken the Manifesto for Software Development as the driver. My perception the PMI is the way to change that thanks to adhere or change the direction and take DAD as the driver right now. That´s in general. In the specific I hope the PMI will not take again Agile like a software especific approach only as it did in the past editions.
Sergio -
I don't think Rami is stating agile is ONLY about mindset. However, simply implementing a different way of working without corresponding changing in how we think is a recipe for "Dark Scrum" or "Doing Agile".
I'd agree that we can't think our way to a new way of working but rather need to work our way to a new way of thinking, but there is definitely a mindset "shift" required for all key stakeholders involved with value delivery to achieve the benefits of increased agility.
Kiron
...
2 replies by Rami Kaibni and Sergio Luis Conte
Dec 28, 2019 12:03 PM
Sergio Luis Conte
...
The problem with your statement is the use of words like Scum. Agile is totally independent from the method/framework to use. On the other side, ant way of working needs a way of thunking BUT as a component not as the key word of the definition. It is simple: when peolple try to use Agile then they undrstand what I am saying. Unfortunatelly most of the times after failling. PMI has taken that definition from an interpretation of the Manifesto for Agile Software Developement BUT the Manifesto us just for software and it is not the definition of Agile. The word software is there for a reason
Dec 28, 2019 3:14 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Kiron
This is absolutely spot on, thank you for weighing in and I totally agree with what you've mentioned.
RK
Saving Changes...
Alexandre CostaScrum Master| Integer Consulting - Pictet technologiesLoures, Portugal
Not ever the best ( quality, price, trends influencie the product path) product succeds on the market, is always the market ( customers demands) that determines the success of the products. It's not different on a certification, the better is that one the market demands more and without any doubt scrum is a trend and a reality with success in the actual market. Scrum certifications take the lead by far, ACP is only a drop in the ocean.
For Self knowledge ACP is better, for bet on professional progression and opening doors, Scrum is definitelly better.
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Dec 28, 2019 3:48 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Alexandre
From a pure marketing and software development perspective, this might be true. However, from other industries point of view like Construction, it's not. Scrum framework doesn't suit the construction industry at all, instead, I find the DSDM works best for construction projects or Adaptive-Waterfall Hybrid Approach.
On the other hand, this also depends on the geographical location. Here in North America, PMI-ACP is reasonably known and organizations, other than those who do software development, value ACP more the SM.
At the end of the day, we all have to remember that the real purpose behind pursuing a certification is professional development and for this effort to have real added value, one should pursue what best suits their career goals and aspirations, not go with the flow with whatever is trending in the market, unless, they are pursing it for pure added knowledge.
RK
Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
Dec 28, 2019 9:34 AM
Replying to Kiron Bondale
...
Sergio -
I don't think Rami is stating agile is ONLY about mindset. However, simply implementing a different way of working without corresponding changing in how we think is a recipe for "Dark Scrum" or "Doing Agile".
I'd agree that we can't think our way to a new way of working but rather need to work our way to a new way of thinking, but there is definitely a mindset "shift" required for all key stakeholders involved with value delivery to achieve the benefits of increased agility.
Kiron
The problem with your statement is the use of words like Scum. Agile is totally independent from the method/framework to use. On the other side, ant way of working needs a way of thunking BUT as a component not as the key word of the definition. It is simple: when peolple try to use Agile then they undrstand what I am saying. Unfortunatelly most of the times after failling. PMI has taken that definition from an interpretation of the Manifesto for Agile Software Developement BUT the Manifesto us just for software and it is not the definition of Agile. The word software is there for a reason
...
2 replies by Kiron Bondale and Rami Kaibni
Dec 28, 2019 3:03 PM
Kiron Bondale
...
Sergio -
"Dark Scrum" is just one type of "cargo cult" behavior which is what I referred to in my response. By no means was I singling out Scrum and I think by now you'd know that I am not a slave of any single method or framework but rather a fan of #ContextCounts...
Kiron
Dec 28, 2019 3:25 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Sergio
I certainly see no problem with Kiron's statement - It is absolutely spot on.
Your statement on the other hand has too many assumptions (i.e. "when people try to use Agile then they undrstand what I am saying. Unfortunatelly most of the times after failling") - Really ?
Everyone who is weighing in here on this dicussion thread, besides having many qualifications, has many years of experience working in Agile so we also know what we are talking about. Part of being agile and the mindset shift I am referring to is being flexible to hear other professionals point of views as part of a team or community and not try to prove them wrong all the time.
The problem with your statement is the use of words like Scum. Agile is totally independent from the method/framework to use. On the other side, ant way of working needs a way of thunking BUT as a component not as the key word of the definition. It is simple: when peolple try to use Agile then they undrstand what I am saying. Unfortunatelly most of the times after failling. PMI has taken that definition from an interpretation of the Manifesto for Agile Software Developement BUT the Manifesto us just for software and it is not the definition of Agile. The word software is there for a reason
Sergio -
"Dark Scrum" is just one type of "cargo cult" behavior which is what I referred to in my response. By no means was I singling out Scrum and I think by now you'd know that I am not a slave of any single method or framework but rather a fan of #ContextCounts...
Kiron
...
1 reply by Sergio Luis Conte
Dec 28, 2019 4:58 PM
Sergio Luis Conte
...
I missundetstood you prevous comment. I know you are not "slave" for anything else indeed.
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Dec 28, 2019 9:34 AM
Replying to Kiron Bondale
...
Sergio -
I don't think Rami is stating agile is ONLY about mindset. However, simply implementing a different way of working without corresponding changing in how we think is a recipe for "Dark Scrum" or "Doing Agile".
I'd agree that we can't think our way to a new way of working but rather need to work our way to a new way of thinking, but there is definitely a mindset "shift" required for all key stakeholders involved with value delivery to achieve the benefits of increased agility.
Kiron
Kiron
This is absolutely spot on, thank you for weighing in and I totally agree with what you've mentioned.