Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Decision Making and Project Management

linkedin twitter facebook   Leadership   Talent Management   Teams  
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
All project managers have to make decisions

Do you systematically follow a decision-making process?

Want to share with us your insight on the subject?

If you use a decision-making process, what steps do you consider?
Sort By:
< 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Jan 06, 2020 10:16 AM
Replying to Joao Sarmento
...
Hi Luís,

Most people focused on more complex decisions, since the question scope was broad... I'd like to add my two cents regarding something smaller but repetitive: the constant decisions we need to make regarding tasks!

On a daily basis I use Eisenhower's Decision Matrix. I find it quite effective tackling the huge list of requests and distractions we are exposed to everyday... Another similar example is e-mail management where I use inbox zero.

Regards,
Dear João
Thank you for participating in this reflection and for your opinion.

Interesting Eisenhower's Decision Matrix for "the constant decisions we need to make regarding tasks"

As long as you consider these two points

Delegating is different from distributing work :-)
Communicating is different from sending emails :-)
...
2 replies by Adrian Carlogea and Joao Sarmento
Jan 07, 2020 5:45 AM
Joao Sarmento
...
Hello Luís,

I fully agree with both statements and I keep them in mind :)

Regards
Jan 07, 2020 8:52 PM
Adrian Carlogea
...
"Delegating is different from distributing work :-)"

That's a very important aspect in my opinion as many people confuse assigning(distributing) work with delegation.

Delegation is when you are responsible for performing a certain task or duty, you have the knowledge to perform it but you choose not to and ask someone else to perform the task on your behalf.

The delegated tasks may involve decision making restricted to the decision making area of the person that delegated them. The person that performs the delegated tasks must have the knowledge to perform them but responsibility lies with the one who delegated.

Assigning work is when you are not responsible for performing a certain task (which may involve decision making) you may or may not have the knowledge to perform it but it is your responsibility to have the task completed by someone else.

The person to which the work has been assigned or distributed should have the knowledge to perform it and also bares the responsibility for the work.

Example of delegating: a senior PM asks a junior PM/project coordinator/project team member to perform some project management work on the project that is managed by him.

Example of work assignment: a PM asks a project team member to perform a task for which that team member is both responsible and has the knowledge to perform it. The assigned work may involved decision making. The PM may or may not have the knowledge to perform the task himself.

If the task does involve decision making then the decision is made by the team member to which the work was assigned and not by the PM. PMs claiming that they have made the decision made by the team member and the team member just advised them, in my opinion just try to take credit for someone else's work.
avatar
Joao Sarmento Senior Project/Program Manager| UNITEL Luanda, Luanda, Angola
Jan 07, 2020 5:42 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
Dear João
Thank you for participating in this reflection and for your opinion.

Interesting Eisenhower's Decision Matrix for "the constant decisions we need to make regarding tasks"

As long as you consider these two points

Delegating is different from distributing work :-)
Communicating is different from sending emails :-)
Hello Luís,

I fully agree with both statements and I keep them in mind :)

Regards
avatar
Sripriya Narayanasamy Author, Say Yes to Project Success| Director, KeyResultz Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
Dear Luis,

I follow the Yale framework for decision making.

1. Discuss factors and weights
2. Find & analyze alternatives
3, Apply factors to alternatives
4. Select final decision

Have the factors arranged in the chronological order of importance before you assign the weights. In fact, I have used this not only for the project situation but also for a real-life situation like selecting the university for our son. It works really great.
...
1 reply by Luis Branco
Jan 08, 2020 4:37 AM
Luis Branco
...
Dear Sripriya
Thank you for participating in this reflection and for your opinion.

Interesting method you shared: YALE framework

When do the decisions you have to make affect some people (like your child) how do you proceed?
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Jan 06, 2020 10:59 AM
Replying to Daire Guiney
...
Dear Peter,

I would have to disagree with you entirely on this point. A team collaborates in the decision making process by gathering relevant information, alternatives, risks, pros/cons and all the other elements already defined by others in the decision making process but ultimately (and that's what they get paid for) the project manager assess the risk and either escalate up to project sponsor or client for a decision on a particular course of action or the project manager makes a decision on behalf of the client acting in their best interest. For example if there are two alternative approaches to a project e.g. build a tunnel or build a bridge to cross a body of water, the client employs a project team made up of many experts in various fields in order to solve the problem. The client may decide based on cost, environmental issues, time to completion or planning permission but in most circumstances the client will go with what the project manager will advise them as they ultimately are the experts in managing project and not the client. Decision by consensus do not really happen in the real world on large scale projects. There is always one person depending on seniority who makes the decisions.

Daire
Dear Daire
Thanks for this opinion
It's one thing to consult people before making a decision.
Another thing, completely different, is to decide by consensus

Of course, in my opinion consensus would be ideal

When you have to communicate the decision, do you consider any issues?
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Jan 06, 2020 11:19 AM
Replying to Adrian Carlogea
...
Hi Daire,

I am not working in constructions but I doubt that such a decision (building either a bridge or a tunnel) can be taken by a project manager.

Probably a group of engineers would be asked to come with different solutions and the board of directors would decide based on many factors including cost.

In my opinion this a an executive-level decision and since such infrastructure projects are usually delivered to public authorities very often this is a political decision.

I don't think your example is very good.
Dear Adrian
Even if it is the project manager who decides (which is unlikely) he would have, as he said, to consult the experts
...
1 reply by Adrian Carlogea
Jan 09, 2020 1:42 AM
Adrian Carlogea
...
Dear Luis,

I don't agree with the word consultation, even if it may be correct in this context. For me consultation is when you are able to make a decision on your own but you ask for someone to express his opinion about it. After you heard the opinion of the person you consulted you may or may NOT take it into consideration.

When the PM does not have the knowledge to make the decision he is FORCED to accept whatever the experts say he does not have the option to not take into consideration the experts "opinion".

The only thing the non-technical PM cares about is the cost of the work that would be performed based on the SMEs decision. This is needed in order for the PM to estimate the budget and report it to the sponsor.

If the budget is too small then the PM would not allow the team to do the work and the only thing he can do is to ask for a bigger budget or work with the relevant stakeholders to remove some things from the scope.

When someone does not have the knowledge to make a decision and claims that he makes the decision consulting the experts for me it feels like that person tried to take credit for someone's else work (decisions).
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Jan 06, 2020 12:26 PM
Replying to Peter Rapin
...
A project is not all about technical decisions nor is it about one person knowing all technical aspects. A project team is about working together to come up with the most effective delivery of the deliverable. Some call it collaboration, some integration and others synergy. With infrastructure projects the deliverable is a complex combination of many disciplines. Each discipline may make some technical decisions independent of others but mostly decisions have to be make with due consideration of the impact on the other disciplines. One can identify the primary discipline and make all others subservient however that rarely results in the most effective solution. The client wants some level of comfort that the decisions/recommendations are the result of team work with the participation of the experts he pays for. The solution is provided by the TEAM.
Dear Peter
Thanks for your feedback

Who is responsible for:
- Moderate information gathering sessions?
-Take the decision?
- Communicate the decision?
- Check if the decision is being implemented?
...
1 reply by Peter Rapin
Jan 07, 2020 12:46 PM
Peter Rapin
...
Decisions are made at different levels and should be based on "person in the best position" to make a specific decision. In other words you have to delegate responsibility, authority and accountability to the appropriate level of the organization. If its a purely technical decision with no impact on others around then the SME of that discipline could/should be the decision maker. However as the problem becomes more and more complex then the decision moves up the line to the person who is in the best position to consider all the elements and impacts.
It is best to identify delegated responsibility, authority and accountability at the start of the project - preferably through the project charter.
In response to your latest query, the person that is to make the decision is responsible for all parts of the decision making process. Of course the leg work may be assigned to others but the decision maker is ultimately responsible and accountable for his decision. The decision maker can hold the provider of information accountable for the information provided but cannot hold anyone other than him(her)self accountable for the actual decision.
avatar
George Freeman Thought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
Luis,

I understand and recognize the best practice models for decision making and the fact that you need different models (i.e., approaches) for different types of decisions (e.g. problem solving, Routine, Personal, etc.). However, my added two cents on this topic is the following:

- Regardless of the model used, decisions that are absent of “Mindfulness,” or maybe better stated as “Self-Regulation” practices, is a decision that has an opportunity to be suspect.

It comes down to this when making a decision:
- Are you making a decision on what you feel (i.e., your emotions) or what you know (i.e., acquired knowledge)?

There’s nothing wrong with interrogating your emotions for insights, but do you have the skills to recognize the difference between what you “feel” and what you “know”? Many people struggle with clarity in this area.
...
2 replies by Luis Branco and Peter Rapin
Jan 07, 2020 12:54 PM
Peter Rapin
...
What you are saying is that we all have our biases and we have to see through our biases to get to the most effective solution,.However, our biases are based on knowledge and experience, even subconscious, and we should not discount them without due consideration. Having said that we need to recognize that others, including those providing information towards problem solving, are faced with the same. That's why with critical problems it is best to involve more than one 'adviser' and listen intently.
Jan 08, 2020 4:45 AM
Luis Branco
...
Dear George
Thank you for participating in this reflection and for your opinion.

I consider this contribution very deep and important.

Before you decide, listen to your "inner voice"

Interesting this question: "But do you have the skills to recognize the difference between what you" feel "and what you" know "?"
avatar
Peter Rapin Subject Matter Expect; Project Delivery| Independent Consultant Ontario, Canada
Jan 07, 2020 11:10 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
Dear Peter
Thanks for your feedback

Who is responsible for:
- Moderate information gathering sessions?
-Take the decision?
- Communicate the decision?
- Check if the decision is being implemented?
Decisions are made at different levels and should be based on "person in the best position" to make a specific decision. In other words you have to delegate responsibility, authority and accountability to the appropriate level of the organization. If its a purely technical decision with no impact on others around then the SME of that discipline could/should be the decision maker. However as the problem becomes more and more complex then the decision moves up the line to the person who is in the best position to consider all the elements and impacts.
It is best to identify delegated responsibility, authority and accountability at the start of the project - preferably through the project charter.
In response to your latest query, the person that is to make the decision is responsible for all parts of the decision making process. Of course the leg work may be assigned to others but the decision maker is ultimately responsible and accountable for his decision. The decision maker can hold the provider of information accountable for the information provided but cannot hold anyone other than him(her)self accountable for the actual decision.
...
1 reply by Luis Branco
Jan 12, 2020 4:36 AM
Luis Branco
...
Dear Peter
Thanks for your feedback
We agree with what you wrote:
"The decision maker can hold the provider of accountable information for the provided information but cannot hold anyone other than him (her) self accountable for the current decision"

I would like to understand better: "Decisions are made at different levels and should be based on" person in the best position "to make a specific decision"

In my opinion, the project manager, knowing the reasons that led to the project, the business analysis, the stakeholders, the project management plan and the deliverables is the "ideal" person to make decisions, including delegating.
avatar
Peter Rapin Subject Matter Expect; Project Delivery| Independent Consultant Ontario, Canada
Jan 07, 2020 12:00 PM
Replying to George Freeman
...
Luis,

I understand and recognize the best practice models for decision making and the fact that you need different models (i.e., approaches) for different types of decisions (e.g. problem solving, Routine, Personal, etc.). However, my added two cents on this topic is the following:

- Regardless of the model used, decisions that are absent of “Mindfulness,” or maybe better stated as “Self-Regulation” practices, is a decision that has an opportunity to be suspect.

It comes down to this when making a decision:
- Are you making a decision on what you feel (i.e., your emotions) or what you know (i.e., acquired knowledge)?

There’s nothing wrong with interrogating your emotions for insights, but do you have the skills to recognize the difference between what you “feel” and what you “know”? Many people struggle with clarity in this area.
What you are saying is that we all have our biases and we have to see through our biases to get to the most effective solution,.However, our biases are based on knowledge and experience, even subconscious, and we should not discount them without due consideration. Having said that we need to recognize that others, including those providing information towards problem solving, are faced with the same. That's why with critical problems it is best to involve more than one 'adviser' and listen intently.
...
1 reply by George Freeman
Jan 07, 2020 1:23 PM
George Freeman
...
Hi Peter,

To your point, “… we have to see through our biases”
--- this is the issue of concern.

In my opinion, individuals are NOT taught to challenge their cognitive biases. To state it another way, the intrinsic nature states the following, “what you feel is what you know.”

Yes, biases have a basis in knowledge and experience, but the subconscious aspects are normally built on the “Negative” side of knowledge and experience, that is, your fears, anxieties, traumas (that we all experience in life) take priority in our subconscious stack.

My reference to Mindfulness and Self-Regulation are stated in the context of tools, as one can use these approaches to interrogate emotions and challenge them for their value in the decision making process.
avatar
George Freeman Thought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
Jan 07, 2020 12:54 PM
Replying to Peter Rapin
...
What you are saying is that we all have our biases and we have to see through our biases to get to the most effective solution,.However, our biases are based on knowledge and experience, even subconscious, and we should not discount them without due consideration. Having said that we need to recognize that others, including those providing information towards problem solving, are faced with the same. That's why with critical problems it is best to involve more than one 'adviser' and listen intently.
Hi Peter,

To your point, “… we have to see through our biases”
--- this is the issue of concern.

In my opinion, individuals are NOT taught to challenge their cognitive biases. To state it another way, the intrinsic nature states the following, “what you feel is what you know.”

Yes, biases have a basis in knowledge and experience, but the subconscious aspects are normally built on the “Negative” side of knowledge and experience, that is, your fears, anxieties, traumas (that we all experience in life) take priority in our subconscious stack.

My reference to Mindfulness and Self-Regulation are stated in the context of tools, as one can use these approaches to interrogate emotions and challenge them for their value in the decision making process.
< 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors