Stéphane ParentSelf Employed / Semi-retired| Leader MakerPrince Edward Island, Canada
I passed the PMI-ACP this morning in the comfort of my basement. (It sure beats driving four hours to a test centre.)
For my fourth PMI certification, I decided it would be appropriate to try an agile approach to the exam preparation. Like test-driven development, I chose to work backward.
I purchased 500 ACP questions and worked my way through each one. When anything was unsure, I would research the question and its answer.
This allowed me to focus on areas where I was weaker and spend little to no time on the areas I was stronger.
The risk with this approach is the same as with TDD: I may not have sufficient coverage to cover all bases. (In TDD, a defect is only a missed test case.)
What do you think of such an approach to learning? Are there any other pitfalls? Saving Changes...
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Feb 24, 2020 12:57 PM
Replying to Stéphane Parent
...
It was provided by Ucertify, Rami. I would only recommend Ucertify and this approach to someone who already has a good base and can put up with idiosyncrasies and typos.
I hear you, thank you Stephane. Saving Changes...
Marcus UdokangProject Manager| Aivaz ConsultingCalgary, Alberta, Canada
Perhaps a form of reverse engineering. It's all about saving time. Sounds like an efficient way of studying, particularly if it brought you positive results. Saving Changes...