I am presently in Iraq where Covid-19 is an issue. Confinement is ongoing since March 14 and some people do not respect confinement for the following reasons (I identified those directly, then there might be others):
- Fear to lose livelihoods;
- Importance of local traditions, such a attending funerals;
- Fear of social dishonour: people refuse to be tested or identified if sick as they may be ostracized by the society;
- Religious belief: The virus is a divine punishment and death is at divine will so there is no need to take precautions and it is alright to expose the family to the virus;
- Distrust in local authorities: Underlying conflicts prevent authorities to communicate transparently on what is going on;
- Belief the virus is a creation from "USA and the Zionist:" some Facebook profile and shady YouTubers convey this message; and people believe they will be infected anyway.
Messages from WHO and the MoH remain very limited here because 1) the message is not adapted to the audience; 2) the message does not reach them; 3) hidden agenda; 4) no project management.
Anyone here having experience in such conditions (not necessarily health-related)? Where should we start to design a proper communication strategy and plan? What traps should we avoid? What issues did you meet?
Yes, some people do not respect confinement due mentioned points and there are also other points.
The percentage is varies against to those points in every developing country.
Also in my country I see most of people does not care about confinement due to other reasons as follows:-
1- Livelihood is becoming very hard and some people working
and getting wages on daily bases.
2- Merchants begin to raise up the price of commodities including
sterilizers and masks (even if there are Health organizations).
3- Careless from all public sectors ( even they watching /hearing News and following up the social media).
... e.t.c.
High context Communication ,top-down deciding is one of the most culture dimensions is good for developing countries.
Today the dead people in Spain reach to 5600 as I heard from Sky-news.
BR,
Thank you, Mansour. The points you mention are also valid here. It makes me think about the fact it is important to include the local communities in the design of a communication strategy and the conception of the messages to deliver.
Quick question: Do you also have in Yemen the issue that some areas of the countries do not receive supplies because of underlying conflict? For instance, in Sulaymaniyah where I am, the supply in masks is very low as Erbil ("capital" of the region) does not want to send them. There is an old rivalry between the two political parties heading each one of those cities.
Also, are the humanitarian clusters still working?
Regards,
Lise Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
Mar 28, 2020 9:49 AM
Replying to Lise GOIN FASKI
...
Thanks a lot, Sergio. Everything you write makes perfectly sense and it gives me a better idea of where to start (list of items, research for airplane crashes, etc.)
By "we are not ready," it means the entire health system in Iraq cannot take care of all the sick people. That means the equipment and medicine are insufficient; and infrastructures cannot welcome a thousands of potential victims of a virus.
Iraq is a very fascinating and unique country, and it has its fair load of challenges. I believe communication is crucial, not only to make people safer but also to prevent future issues. As the authorities are not transparent, people make up their own (irrational) explanations that may nurture present and future conflicts.
On which previous pandemics did you work?
Thats rhe point. As other catastrofic events there is no system in the whole world with enough resources to face this because there is an econmic equation about it mainly in health care where having not used resources demage them. But it is valid taken into account if you have the enough resorces for non catastrofic situation. With that said the important thing is demostraing proactivity. You know the R of the virus then you can make projection BUT if and only if you have the possibility to do enough testing which is the other key due to reactive tapes availability between others Saving Changes...
Thomas WalentaGlobal Project Economy ExpertHackenheim, Germany
Lise,
here is a video by Joseph Grenny, who explains how to influence masses. He spoke at a PMI conference some years ago. One of his examples is how to influence behavior in an African slum.
Maybe that helps you to find some ideas. Saving Changes...
George FreemanThought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
Hi Lise,
I have no experience in such conditions, but I do see a recognizable pattern of behavior. Consider the following:
Deep-rooted cognitive biases are unlikely to be broken through traditional communications; in fact, communications that directly address the subject-matter by an authority are more likely to confirm the bias than address it. This occurs due to one not being able to distinguish between “that which they feel” and “that which they know.” In other words, there is no cognitive awareness that these two dimensions of knowledge exist; therefore, “what you feel is what you know.” If there is truth to the above, then culturally-specific analogies that address these two dimensions should be incorporated into the overall “communication strategy.”
In general, I’m speaking about a “mindfulness campaign,” not stated as such, but addressing elements of the practice. Without cognitive awareness of this dimension of life and knowledge, we are unlikely to break these cognitive biases that are affecting our health and well-being.
...
1 reply by Lise GOIN FASKI
Mar 28, 2020 3:38 PM
Lise GOIN FASKI
...
Hi George,
Thank you very much for explaining this pattern. I believe this is very important to consider it in a communication plan.
Have you seen this pattern in other conditions than this one? Then how did it impact your project and how did you deal with it?
I have no experience in such conditions, but I do see a recognizable pattern of behavior. Consider the following:
Deep-rooted cognitive biases are unlikely to be broken through traditional communications; in fact, communications that directly address the subject-matter by an authority are more likely to confirm the bias than address it. This occurs due to one not being able to distinguish between “that which they feel” and “that which they know.” In other words, there is no cognitive awareness that these two dimensions of knowledge exist; therefore, “what you feel is what you know.” If there is truth to the above, then culturally-specific analogies that address these two dimensions should be incorporated into the overall “communication strategy.”
In general, I’m speaking about a “mindfulness campaign,” not stated as such, but addressing elements of the practice. Without cognitive awareness of this dimension of life and knowledge, we are unlikely to break these cognitive biases that are affecting our health and well-being.
Hi George,
Thank you very much for explaining this pattern. I believe this is very important to consider it in a communication plan.
Have you seen this pattern in other conditions than this one? Then how did it impact your project and how did you deal with it?
...
1 reply by George Freeman
Mar 28, 2020 6:06 PM
George Freeman
...
Although mindfulness has a lot of value in projects, I was speaking to the “project of life,” meaning the human condition. Whether it be cognitive biases and/or the effects of sustained anxiety in one’s life, there are times when we have difficulty “being in the present moment.” That is to say, that we are aware of our feelings and emotions in the here and now, not looking to the past or to the future.
Empathetically speaking, I can’t imagine the degree of anxiety that one normally has in Iraq when it comes to stability and safety. When you add COVID-19 on top of that, it almost seems emotionally insurmountable. That said, connecting at an empathetic level is about the only way to reach someone who is in a “fight or flight” state of being, which is likely the reality for many in Iraq. When in this state, the chemical responses in the body push one towards “immediate survival responses,” and not towards reasoned thought about the “present moment.”
So, I’m suggesting that communications have a 3-prong approach:
- Empathetic alignment (i.e., align yourself to their condition)
- Mindfulness directives (i.e., give some tooling for “being in the present moment”)
- Then provide messaging regarding COVID-19
Regards,
George
Saving Changes...
George FreemanThought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
Mar 28, 2020 3:38 PM
Replying to Lise GOIN FASKI
...
Hi George,
Thank you very much for explaining this pattern. I believe this is very important to consider it in a communication plan.
Have you seen this pattern in other conditions than this one? Then how did it impact your project and how did you deal with it?
Although mindfulness has a lot of value in projects, I was speaking to the “project of life,” meaning the human condition. Whether it be cognitive biases and/or the effects of sustained anxiety in one’s life, there are times when we have difficulty “being in the present moment.” That is to say, that we are aware of our feelings and emotions in the here and now, not looking to the past or to the future.
Empathetically speaking, I can’t imagine the degree of anxiety that one normally has in Iraq when it comes to stability and safety. When you add COVID-19 on top of that, it almost seems emotionally insurmountable. That said, connecting at an empathetic level is about the only way to reach someone who is in a “fight or flight” state of being, which is likely the reality for many in Iraq. When in this state, the chemical responses in the body push one towards “immediate survival responses,” and not towards reasoned thought about the “present moment.”
So, I’m suggesting that communications have a 3-prong approach:
- Empathetic alignment (i.e., align yourself to their condition)
- Mindfulness directives (i.e., give some tooling for “being in the present moment”)
- Then provide messaging regarding COVID-19
Regards,
George
...
1 reply by Lise GOIN FASKI
Mar 29, 2020 5:59 AM
Lise GOIN FASKI
...
Thank you very much, George. I am very thankful for the suggestions you wrote.
There is anxiety here but paradoxically people did not rush in the supermarkets when the confinement was announced. It seems people take this with more "philosophy." That said, in the past I could see this trend to spread irrational rumours before a military attack, notably because no reliable information was available. We still have no reliable information available by the way.
Although mindfulness has a lot of value in projects, I was speaking to the “project of life,” meaning the human condition. Whether it be cognitive biases and/or the effects of sustained anxiety in one’s life, there are times when we have difficulty “being in the present moment.” That is to say, that we are aware of our feelings and emotions in the here and now, not looking to the past or to the future.
Empathetically speaking, I can’t imagine the degree of anxiety that one normally has in Iraq when it comes to stability and safety. When you add COVID-19 on top of that, it almost seems emotionally insurmountable. That said, connecting at an empathetic level is about the only way to reach someone who is in a “fight or flight” state of being, which is likely the reality for many in Iraq. When in this state, the chemical responses in the body push one towards “immediate survival responses,” and not towards reasoned thought about the “present moment.”
So, I’m suggesting that communications have a 3-prong approach:
- Empathetic alignment (i.e., align yourself to their condition)
- Mindfulness directives (i.e., give some tooling for “being in the present moment”)
- Then provide messaging regarding COVID-19
Regards,
George
Thank you very much, George. I am very thankful for the suggestions you wrote.
There is anxiety here but paradoxically people did not rush in the supermarkets when the confinement was announced. It seems people take this with more "philosophy." That said, in the past I could see this trend to spread irrational rumours before a military attack, notably because no reliable information was available. We still have no reliable information available by the way. Saving Changes...
POWER DISTANCE
Iraq scores high on this dimension (score of 95) which means that people accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a place and which needs no further justification.
Action: This is why your message has to come from a very senior person.
INDIVIDUALISM
Iraq, with a score of 30 is considered a collectivist society. This is manifest in a close long-term commitment to the member ‘group’, be that a family, extended family, or extended relationships. Loyalty in a collectivist culture is paramount, and over-rides most other societal rules and regulations.
Action: The society fosters strong relationships where everyone takes responsibility for fellow members of their group. Highlight that they have to take responsibility for their family, parents, brothers and sisters, children, spouse.
MASCULINITY
Iraq scores 70 on this dimension and is thus a Masculine society. In Masculine countries people “live in order to work”, managers are expected to be decisive and assertive, the emphasis is on equity, competition and performance and conflicts are resolved by fighting them out.
Action: The message has to come from a senior male leader.
UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE
Iraq scores 85 on this dimension and thus has a high preference for avoiding uncertainty.
Action: That is the reason the attend funerals and maintain rigid codes of belief and behavior and are intolerant of unorthodox behavior and ideas. You have to show them real examples that COVID-19 infected 607,965 people all around the word and killed 28,125 people already. In Iraq Confirmed: 458 Deaths: 40 Recovered: 122 Active: 296
LONG TERM ORIENTATION
Iraq’s low score of 25 reveals that it has a normative culture. People in such societies have a strong concern with establishing the absolute Truth; they are normative in their thinking.
Action: They exhibit great respect for traditions, a relatively small propensity to save for the future, and a focus on achieving quick results. That is why it is so difficult to convince them. A senior male leader has to convince people that it is part of the tradition that people care each other.
INDULGENCE
The very low score of 17 in this dimensions means that Iraqi society is one of Restraint. Societies with a low score in this dimension have a tendency to cynicism and pessimism. Also, in contrast to Indulgent societies, Restrained societies do not put much emphasis on leisure time and control the gratification of their desires.
Action: People with this orientation have the perception that their actions are Restrained by social norms and feel that indulging themselves is somewhat wrong.
Thank you for this important reminder. It is always a great indicator to consider. I will consider it into the plan despite Geert Hofstede's values ranking is not always accurate.
Yes, you are making a wrong reading..jejeje (sorry, I can not say that, just a bad joke). Fist thing to understand on yout comment: how business layer is defined? Take a look to the definition and you will find the answer because the business layer is critical. In that layer you will find shared values, style, strategy, structure, systems (not software only), staff policies, for example All the other layers must be aligened and created based on business layer because business layer interacts with the environment. So, the environment has changed then the whole enterprise architecture must be ready for that. Organization started projects to create solutions for business problems that happend when need of change happend due to a change into the environment. @Lise has to take into accout this. What she is asking for is about to create a solucion. Perhaps this helps to @Lise: https://www.projectmanagement.com/blog-pos...-right-solution That´s what helped my current organization when we need to create the same than @Lise is asking for. And do not forget Shannon´s theory or communication.
Thanks a lot, Luis. You are so right. The blog link makes it very explicit. So thanks for sharing Saving Changes...
Jose HarrisChief Executive Officer| Space Environment and Atmosphere Solutions, LLCAlexandria, Va, United States
Mar 28, 2020 7:18 AM
Replying to Laszlo J. Kremmer MBA, CSPO®, CSM®, PMP®
POWER DISTANCE
Iraq scores high on this dimension (score of 95) which means that people accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a place and which needs no further justification.
Action: This is why your message has to come from a very senior person.
INDIVIDUALISM
Iraq, with a score of 30 is considered a collectivist society. This is manifest in a close long-term commitment to the member ‘group’, be that a family, extended family, or extended relationships. Loyalty in a collectivist culture is paramount, and over-rides most other societal rules and regulations.
Action: The society fosters strong relationships where everyone takes responsibility for fellow members of their group. Highlight that they have to take responsibility for their family, parents, brothers and sisters, children, spouse.
MASCULINITY
Iraq scores 70 on this dimension and is thus a Masculine society. In Masculine countries people “live in order to work”, managers are expected to be decisive and assertive, the emphasis is on equity, competition and performance and conflicts are resolved by fighting them out.
Action: The message has to come from a senior male leader.
UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE
Iraq scores 85 on this dimension and thus has a high preference for avoiding uncertainty.
Action: That is the reason the attend funerals and maintain rigid codes of belief and behavior and are intolerant of unorthodox behavior and ideas. You have to show them real examples that COVID-19 infected 607,965 people all around the word and killed 28,125 people already. In Iraq Confirmed: 458 Deaths: 40 Recovered: 122 Active: 296
LONG TERM ORIENTATION
Iraq’s low score of 25 reveals that it has a normative culture. People in such societies have a strong concern with establishing the absolute Truth; they are normative in their thinking.
Action: They exhibit great respect for traditions, a relatively small propensity to save for the future, and a focus on achieving quick results. That is why it is so difficult to convince them. A senior male leader has to convince people that it is part of the tradition that people care each other.
INDULGENCE
The very low score of 17 in this dimensions means that Iraqi society is one of Restraint. Societies with a low score in this dimension have a tendency to cynicism and pessimism. Also, in contrast to Indulgent societies, Restrained societies do not put much emphasis on leisure time and control the gratification of their desires.
Action: People with this orientation have the perception that their actions are Restrained by social norms and feel that indulging themselves is somewhat wrong.
Laszlo,
As you highlight under UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE, there is a lack of tolerance in the society towards unorthodox behavior -- not attending funerals in this circumstance. Would sharing numbers of infected by attending funerals be sufficient, at least in some cases, to encourage the masculine senior person to prohibit those in his family or lineage from attending funerals? Would tapping into this same trait encourage the masculine senior person to have his family or lineage get medical treatment or tests? Saving Changes...