Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

How are you solving business challenges with low-code/no-code tools?

linkedin twitter facebook   Citizen Development  
avatar
Jody Temple White Citizen Developer, PMP, Operations Specialist| ASG Projects, LLC Portland, Or, United States
Have you created any business apps using low-code / no-code tools? If so, what did you create and why?
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Jody Temple White Citizen Developer, PMP, Operations Specialist| ASG Projects, LLC Portland, Or, United States
Dec 18, 2020 12:20 PM
Replying to Ryan Jones
...
Great question Jody. Here are my top 3 insights/reflections, from implementing the CoE:

1) Start small and build on successes. Executive buy-in and access to funding was a huge challenge at first. To get over this we had to get some small wins and 'sell' the heck out of the returns to engage interest and eventually get funding for the CoE. (Find the most interested Exec, deliver benefits for them and use that support and success to grow)
2) Choose the right people for the CoE. You need folk that are entrepreneurial and that can manage in chaos. No matter how much you train business-users to build their own tools, or how simple the tech seems, remember that there are folk that struggle with formatting an email. Your CoE team has to be able to effectively manage and guide these types of users without them getting frustrated and scuttling the initiative (which can cost credibility, support and funding)
3) Have some rules in place. At the end of the day, the tools that are built have to be auditable and risk managed. It pays dividends in the long run to have some rules, guidelines and standards in place to help manage this. For example, in addition to user support guides, my team created a document that outlined some basic rules around SharePoint/Nintex usage such as department administrator roles, data governance and access control for applications built using the tools etc. (always be prepared for the 'what if' questions from Internal Audit and others)

One of my other early lessons, was to be agile, use agile techniques, but not to call it agile. There was still so much misunderstanding around what agile actually is, that it often detracted from what we were actually trying to accomplish.

Hope this helps.
Great tips and insight. Thanks so much for sharing!
avatar
gilbert brown Chief Architect | E4 Logics inc. Perry Hall, Md, United States
Wow. Fascinating. Some time ago I took on a project that emphasized no code and low code. We evaluated vendors and picked the most promising at that time. If others would like to know the vendor, I will share their name privately. The project was put in-place to stop shadow Information Technology (IT) behavior. A Division had budget, they hired their own IT crew and at the end IT staff had to support, train, patch, update, secure, and evangelize the new app that no one knew anything about. I admit the project was a success since all users were trained on the tool and folks were excited that they could move data from one box to the other box without asking IT. They were also excited that they were allowed to think about their customers and not IT. So why did the movement die? IT took over support of the app. There was no value - career wise - in investing the time and energy in tool that did not follow industry standards and industry tools for building critical IT apps. Second, the code underneath needed support and there was no two way binding were a code change was reflected on the front end. You had to use the tool - no exceptions. Also, apps that remained small were fine. Apps that grew in size needed additional support from the vendor and the tool. So, usage of the tool worked; it wowed the customers with agility; it gave the citizen developer a strong feeling of ownership but there was a point when IT was needed and this is the area that lacked the most support.
...
1 reply by Jody Temple White
Dec 29, 2020 1:30 PM
Jody Temple White
...
Very interesting Gilbert. Thanks for sharing. Sounds like you got some great user adoption which is always fun to see and feel the excitement. If you had it to do over again, what would you do differently?
avatar
Jody Temple White Citizen Developer, PMP, Operations Specialist| ASG Projects, LLC Portland, Or, United States
Dec 28, 2020 2:50 PM
Replying to gilbert brown
...
Wow. Fascinating. Some time ago I took on a project that emphasized no code and low code. We evaluated vendors and picked the most promising at that time. If others would like to know the vendor, I will share their name privately. The project was put in-place to stop shadow Information Technology (IT) behavior. A Division had budget, they hired their own IT crew and at the end IT staff had to support, train, patch, update, secure, and evangelize the new app that no one knew anything about. I admit the project was a success since all users were trained on the tool and folks were excited that they could move data from one box to the other box without asking IT. They were also excited that they were allowed to think about their customers and not IT. So why did the movement die? IT took over support of the app. There was no value - career wise - in investing the time and energy in tool that did not follow industry standards and industry tools for building critical IT apps. Second, the code underneath needed support and there was no two way binding were a code change was reflected on the front end. You had to use the tool - no exceptions. Also, apps that remained small were fine. Apps that grew in size needed additional support from the vendor and the tool. So, usage of the tool worked; it wowed the customers with agility; it gave the citizen developer a strong feeling of ownership but there was a point when IT was needed and this is the area that lacked the most support.
Very interesting Gilbert. Thanks for sharing. Sounds like you got some great user adoption which is always fun to see and feel the excitement. If you had it to do over again, what would you do differently?
...
1 reply by gilbert brown
Dec 29, 2020 11:52 PM
gilbert brown
...
Hello .. Great question! When we were hiding from IT, there was Agile, but no concepts related to DevOps or DevSecOps. Transparency and understanding all stakeholders needed to make the No Code Low Code mantra a success is critical. All team roles need to be defined and discussed. These roles not only include Business SMEs and the Vendor but also, who is responsible for environment deployments, security/patching/Authority to Operate, tuning/scaling, change management, Helpdesk resolutions and what is highly important, metrics that show time to market and demonstrated value of the product produced by the selected tool. Keeping everyone involved who needs to make the entire process a success during and after development is critical, constantly showing product value is paramount and maintaining roadmaps based on evolutionary architectures detailing where different frameworks, methodologies and tools are used to support the organization goals are a win for all.
avatar
gilbert brown Chief Architect | E4 Logics inc. Perry Hall, Md, United States
Dec 29, 2020 1:30 PM
Replying to Jody Temple White
...
Very interesting Gilbert. Thanks for sharing. Sounds like you got some great user adoption which is always fun to see and feel the excitement. If you had it to do over again, what would you do differently?
Hello .. Great question! When we were hiding from IT, there was Agile, but no concepts related to DevOps or DevSecOps. Transparency and understanding all stakeholders needed to make the No Code Low Code mantra a success is critical. All team roles need to be defined and discussed. These roles not only include Business SMEs and the Vendor but also, who is responsible for environment deployments, security/patching/Authority to Operate, tuning/scaling, change management, Helpdesk resolutions and what is highly important, metrics that show time to market and demonstrated value of the product produced by the selected tool. Keeping everyone involved who needs to make the entire process a success during and after development is critical, constantly showing product value is paramount and maintaining roadmaps based on evolutionary architectures detailing where different frameworks, methodologies and tools are used to support the organization goals are a win for all.
avatar
VerĂ³nica Elizabeth Pozo Ruiz RYLAI Access Control Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador
The main benefit of No Code/ Low Code tools is that specialists in certain areas of knowledge can develop applications according to the organization's needs, without learning to code in some language. This allows to have specialized software made using adequate No Code / Low Code platforms.
avatar
UmaMaheswaraRao putrevu Srikakulam, India
Dec 12, 2020 9:49 AM
Replying to Jaime Gonzalez
...
Hi Jody. No-code and Low-code are different concepts. No-code help create simple apps quickly, normally through the use of "drag-and-drop" functionalities and templates. However, if you need to create complex, enterprise-level applications, at some point you will have to "write" some code. Here's where low-code software development platforms come to action. They are a high-level language that allow you to describe the business rules and processes in abstraction and then code generators and AI create the code, the programs and the databases automatically. Forrester has predicted that in 2021, 75% of the software houses will adopt low-code given the urgent need to create software in an agile way left by the pandemic. You can check GeneXus (https://www.genexus.com/en/) which is what I believe the longest standing low-code platform in the market. Hope it helps!
YES
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

I lie every second of the day. My whole life has been a sham.

- George Costanza

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors