Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

When should your ERP system go live?

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
Maria Hrabikova
Community Champion
Ricany U Prahy, Prague, Czechia
When is a good time /not a good time to go live with your ERP system? Let's consider accounting periods, a fiscal year, and other factors.
What are your lessons learned?
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 >
avatar
Maria Hrabikova
Community Champion
Ricany U Prahy, Prague, Czechia
Feb 09, 2021 11:28 AM
Replying to Mayte Mata Sivera
...
I'm fan of big bangs implementation, love the challenges, as the team says here "Go big or go home" :). Maria don't hesitate to send me an message in the inbox if you want to disclose more info about the ERP that you are implementing.
Thank you, Mayte (I very much appreciate your support).

Of course, I have the questions - and will reach out to you soon.
avatar
Keith Novak Tukwila, Wa, United States
Amusing anecdote on the big-bang implementation:

20+ years ago, my employer was implementing a multi-billion dollar digital transformation of their configuration management and ERP systems. The implementation had been taking much longer than anticipated and a frustrated senior executive demanded that we just move ahead, "flip the switch" implement everything over the weekend, and work out the problems from there.

When we came back on Monday, nothing had changed. Some unfortunate soul had to explain to the C-suite that there is no actual switch to flip and that is only a figure of speech. It actually involves massive amounts of data migration from hundreds of independent systems into the new system.

The moral of the story is the big-bang implementation approach may be a lot more difficult than it seems in the sales brochure.
...
1 reply by Maria Hrabikova
Feb 09, 2021 5:23 PM
Maria Hrabikova
...
Thank you, Keith.

Two questions:
1. How did things turn out?
2. What was the root cause / were the root causes of the problem?
avatar
Maria Hrabikova
Community Champion
Ricany U Prahy, Prague, Czechia
Feb 09, 2021 4:26 PM
Replying to Keith Novak
...
Amusing anecdote on the big-bang implementation:

20+ years ago, my employer was implementing a multi-billion dollar digital transformation of their configuration management and ERP systems. The implementation had been taking much longer than anticipated and a frustrated senior executive demanded that we just move ahead, "flip the switch" implement everything over the weekend, and work out the problems from there.

When we came back on Monday, nothing had changed. Some unfortunate soul had to explain to the C-suite that there is no actual switch to flip and that is only a figure of speech. It actually involves massive amounts of data migration from hundreds of independent systems into the new system.

The moral of the story is the big-bang implementation approach may be a lot more difficult than it seems in the sales brochure.
Thank you, Keith.

Two questions:
1. How did things turn out?
2. What was the root cause / were the root causes of the problem?
avatar
Keith Novak Tukwila, Wa, United States
How it turned out was that the enterprise abandoned the completely non-feasible direction that we just had to start using a system that was not even close to operational, and continue with the plan laid out by the technical team. It was analogous to disconnecting the power to your house mid-winter with the expectation that you'd just have to find a solution.

The root cause was the major stakeholders were dictating orders without understanding the nature of the work. It was a bit like attempting to direct a moon landing without understanding basic physics.

Another fun memory from this was that the executive had set an annual goal that all "legacy systems" would be eliminated by the end-of-year due to this new software. That goal was met by renaming "legacy systems" to "classic client". Mission accomplished.
...
1 reply by Maria Hrabikova
Feb 11, 2021 1:41 PM
Maria Hrabikova
...
Keith - thank you for sharing this experience with the network.
avatar
Maria Hrabikova
Community Champion
Ricany U Prahy, Prague, Czechia
Feb 11, 2021 12:10 PM
Replying to Keith Novak
...
How it turned out was that the enterprise abandoned the completely non-feasible direction that we just had to start using a system that was not even close to operational, and continue with the plan laid out by the technical team. It was analogous to disconnecting the power to your house mid-winter with the expectation that you'd just have to find a solution.

The root cause was the major stakeholders were dictating orders without understanding the nature of the work. It was a bit like attempting to direct a moon landing without understanding basic physics.

Another fun memory from this was that the executive had set an annual goal that all "legacy systems" would be eliminated by the end-of-year due to this new software. That goal was met by renaming "legacy systems" to "classic client". Mission accomplished.
Keith - thank you for sharing this experience with the network.
avatar
Abolfazl Yousefi Darestani Manager, Quality and Continuous Improvement| Hörmann-TNR Industrial Doors Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Kiron made a good point.
< 1 2 3 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time--a tremendous whack."

- Winston Churchill

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors