Project Management Central
Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
|
|||
|
|||
Keith Novak
Tukwila, Wa, USA
The generic name is a time-boxed view.
I don't know of a specific name for that including the prior week, but I often show a 2 week look ahead, and a delinquency status. That is similar except some thing go more than a week late, and they should have a current ECD. Generally I don't worry about giving formal names to approaches unless it is some internal name picked for convenience or a catchy acronym.
A rolling-window?
Abolfazl Yousefi Darestani
Manager, Quality and Continuous Improvement| Hörmann-TNR Industrial Doors
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
timeframe?
rolling plan time profile
I have found that the one-week forward look, even at the field level, is no longer adequate due to material deliveries and equipment lead times. Looking ahead two and/or three weeks, although in less detail, manages risks better. I've always referred to the process as the four/five week "rolling site schedule".
...
1 reply by Keith Novak
Oct 14, 2021 3:23 PM
Keith Novak
...
When using a short term look-ahead, that should never be the only view. It's just the most frequent cadence.
Items that are farther out can be brought into view if there is some early indication as to performance issues or to keep them on the radar, but asking everyone if all their plan dates month in the future are still on track quickly detracts from the focus items, and you quickly become the status monkey that everyone hates having as the PM. The longer range views are reviewed less frequently, with the exception of the critical path or other high importance items that need special attention, IMHO. Where the PM becomes much more than a project admin managing schedule, is our analysis of what critical items must be brought into focus.
Keith Novak
Tukwila, Wa, USA
Oct 14, 2021 2:46 PM
Replying to Peter Rapin
...
I have found that the one-week forward look, even at the field level, is no longer adequate due to material deliveries and equipment lead times. Looking ahead two and/or three weeks, although in less detail, manages risks better. I've always referred to the process as the four/five week "rolling site schedule".
Items that are farther out can be brought into view if there is some early indication as to performance issues or to keep them on the radar, but asking everyone if all their plan dates month in the future are still on track quickly detracts from the focus items, and you quickly become the status monkey that everyone hates having as the PM. The longer range views are reviewed less frequently, with the exception of the critical path or other high importance items that need special attention, IMHO. Where the PM becomes much more than a project admin managing schedule, is our analysis of what critical items must be brought into focus.
Really appreciated for advice.. Thanks...
|
Please login or join to reply
ADVERTISEMENTS
I see where one young boy has just passed 500 hours sitting in a treetop. There is a good deal of discussion as to what to do with a civilization that produces prodigies like that. Wouldn't it be a good idea to take his ladder away from him and leave him up there? - Will Rogers |