Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Triple Bottom Line in assessment of Social and Environmental Performance in construction industry

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
AAMIR AYOUB MIR Jammu & Kashmir Financial Services Ltd Jk, India
kindly provide your valuable insights
Sort By:
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Do you have any specific question as to what insight you are looking for?
avatar
Abolfazl Yousefi Darestani Manager, Quality and Continuous Improvement| Hörmann-TNR Industrial Doors Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
It is a little bit vague. Provide more details.
avatar
Thomas Walenta Global Project Economy Expert Hackenheim, Germany
Aamir,

there is a lot of experience and regulations how companies not only report on their financial bottomline, but also on social and environmental achievements. It runs under terms like ESG/sustainability reporting, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), or
https://earth.org/worlds-most-sustainable-companies-in-2021/
avatar
AAMIR AYOUB MIR Jammu & Kashmir Financial Services Ltd Jk, India
thank you everyone
avatar
Peter Rapin Subject Matter Expect; Project Delivery| Independent Consultant Ontario, Canada
I provide the following comment in order to start discussion. Let's be clear here, we are talking about companies (not persons). A company sole purpose is for the financial benefit of the owners

I am not a believer in the "triple bottom line" concept. In a capitalistic society a business has but one 'bottom line" - show a profit. Without it there is no sustainable company. Doesn't matter how appropriate your social and environmental performance is - no money, no business.

I also believe that a successful business has to be socially and environmentally responsible, especially in the long term. If society doesn't support you, society will not support your services therefore no sales

Thus, social and environmental responsibility is a means to an end (make money) not an end in itself.
...
1 reply by AAMIR AYOUB MIR
Jan 03, 2023 10:27 AM
AAMIR AYOUB MIR
...
people make companies not robots
avatar
AAMIR AYOUB MIR Jammu & Kashmir Financial Services Ltd Jk, India
quite interesting reply. I am a research scholar and want to discuss whether TBL helps in measuring social and environmental performance
avatar
AAMIR AYOUB MIR Jammu & Kashmir Financial Services Ltd Jk, India
Jan 03, 2023 10:12 AM
Replying to Peter Rapin
...
I provide the following comment in order to start discussion. Let's be clear here, we are talking about companies (not persons). A company sole purpose is for the financial benefit of the owners

I am not a believer in the "triple bottom line" concept. In a capitalistic society a business has but one 'bottom line" - show a profit. Without it there is no sustainable company. Doesn't matter how appropriate your social and environmental performance is - no money, no business.

I also believe that a successful business has to be socially and environmentally responsible, especially in the long term. If society doesn't support you, society will not support your services therefore no sales

Thus, social and environmental responsibility is a means to an end (make money) not an end in itself.
people make companies not robots
...
1 reply by Peter Rapin
Jan 03, 2023 10:43 AM
Peter Rapin
...
Companies are not people although it seems modern society is attaching people characteristics to companies. In a capitalistic environment companies are vehicles specifically created to generate income for the people that created them (and sometimes to hide the owners from their obligations). It is not the companies that have social and environmental obligations, its the owners and managers.
avatar
Peter Rapin Subject Matter Expect; Project Delivery| Independent Consultant Ontario, Canada
Jan 03, 2023 10:27 AM
Replying to AAMIR AYOUB MIR
...
people make companies not robots
Companies are not people although it seems modern society is attaching people characteristics to companies. In a capitalistic environment companies are vehicles specifically created to generate income for the people that created them (and sometimes to hide the owners from their obligations). It is not the companies that have social and environmental obligations, its the owners and managers.
...
1 reply by Stéphane Parent
Jan 05, 2023 7:42 AM
Stéphane Parent
...
"and sometimes to hide the owners from their obligations"

By design, companies--especially corporations--are meant to transfer risks and liabilities away from the owners.
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
Jan 03, 2023 10:43 AM
Replying to Peter Rapin
...
Companies are not people although it seems modern society is attaching people characteristics to companies. In a capitalistic environment companies are vehicles specifically created to generate income for the people that created them (and sometimes to hide the owners from their obligations). It is not the companies that have social and environmental obligations, its the owners and managers.
"and sometimes to hide the owners from their obligations"

By design, companies--especially corporations--are meant to transfer risks and liabilities away from the owners.
avatar
Latha Thamma reddi Sr Product and Portfolio Management (Automation Innovation)| DXC Technology Mckinney, Tx, United States
Thanks for sharing

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"A behaviorist is someone who pulls habits out of rats."

- Anonymous

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors