I tested Infinity vs ChatGPT (3.5 and 4.0), but still hadn't the chance to test it vs Bard or similar. If someone gave them a try, can you please share your experience and thoughts in comparing Infinity, ChatGPT, Bard, etc.?
I have done comparisons a few weeks ago as part of a GenAI course I completed in the output produced for a number of productivity and PM-oriented prompts between ChatGPT (3.5), Copilot and Poe and did find a number of differences in the quality and accuracy of the outputs. Unfortunately, I did not find any one to be superior to the others in all cases so it really comes down to what I am looking to achieve with a given query.
Infinity has a comprehensive basis of PMI resources that it was trained on, however it is lacking a lot of the public domain knowledge about the field (including the contents of this community) so while its answers are likely to be more accurate than that of a broader trained tool, it might be constrained as well when dealing with unique or boundary type use cases.
Kiron
...
1 reply by Vincenzo Mosca
Feb 05, 2024 8:58 AM
Vincenzo Mosca
...
Thanks Kiron for your reply. It is more or less the same takeaways I took by comparing Infinity and ChatGPT. Moreover, I tried Infinity to prepare create some documents for downloading, and even if it says it can prepare file it actually doesn't do that. Hope soon Infinity will be able to do it (PMI proprietary content is made up of tons of docs and templates from which Infinity can be trained on)
I have done comparisons a few weeks ago as part of a GenAI course I completed in the output produced for a number of productivity and PM-oriented prompts between ChatGPT (3.5), Copilot and Poe and did find a number of differences in the quality and accuracy of the outputs. Unfortunately, I did not find any one to be superior to the others in all cases so it really comes down to what I am looking to achieve with a given query.
Infinity has a comprehensive basis of PMI resources that it was trained on, however it is lacking a lot of the public domain knowledge about the field (including the contents of this community) so while its answers are likely to be more accurate than that of a broader trained tool, it might be constrained as well when dealing with unique or boundary type use cases.
Kiron
Thanks Kiron for your reply. It is more or less the same takeaways I took by comparing Infinity and ChatGPT. Moreover, I tried Infinity to prepare create some documents for downloading, and even if it says it can prepare file it actually doesn't do that. Hope soon Infinity will be able to do it (PMI proprietary content is made up of tons of docs and templates from which Infinity can be trained on) Saving Changes...
Frank BacchusCIO LTS International / Chief Program Manager| LTS InternationalHolmdel, Nj, United States
Hi Vincenzo:
Thanks for initiating this dialogue! I'm enjoying exploring various large language models like BARD, Co-Pilot, and others. It's fascinating to see the convergence in responses and directions, occasionally accompanied by inconsistencies. In my view, these are valuable learning opportunities for all AI tools, highlighting areas for continued development towards becoming more robust and reliable. Saving Changes...
Thanks to you Frank. I totally agree with you about these tools inconsistencies, but I see there is large room for improvement. I am sure the will become robust, reliable and will allow us to do a lot more things than currently they allow (or at least, I am sure I will discover more :) ) Saving Changes...
Rodrigo AguinagaCivil Engineer (Spain chartered) PMP| Independent EngineerGetxo, Bizkaia, Spain
I have just completed a PMI introductory webinar Generative AI Overview. So my comment may be out of place!
Within the course there is a comparative of BARD, Chat GPT and Claude Anthrop/; for a very simple calculation of critical path , and float. 5 activities and simple start -finish predecesorsbr type="_moz"
I couldn`t access to Claudio ( seems not avaible in Europe or Spain).
To my surprise both a,Bard and GPT , were wrong and incomplete, and neither coming up with the same answer to a very simple path
I cannot imagine with a a 200 hundreds activities planning!.
My feeling is that still there is much work to dobr type="_moz"
...
1 reply by Vincenzo Mosca
Feb 06, 2024 7:03 AM
Vincenzo Mosca
...
Thanks for your thoughts, Rodrigo. The road for robust tool to help us in our work is still long, but we are on the right way. I think further developments of Infinity will make it even better and trustful resource for all of us, with also other capabilities we need and will use
I have just completed a PMI introductory webinar Generative AI Overview. So my comment may be out of place!
Within the course there is a comparative of BARD, Chat GPT and Claude Anthrop/; for a very simple calculation of critical path , and float. 5 activities and simple start -finish predecesorsbr type="_moz"
I couldn`t access to Claudio ( seems not avaible in Europe or Spain).
To my surprise both a,Bard and GPT , were wrong and incomplete, and neither coming up with the same answer to a very simple path
I cannot imagine with a a 200 hundreds activities planning!.
My feeling is that still there is much work to dobr type="_moz"
Thanks for your thoughts, Rodrigo. The road for robust tool to help us in our work is still long, but we are on the right way. I think further developments of Infinity will make it even better and trustful resource for all of us, with also other capabilities we need and will use Saving Changes...
Do you mean you didn't test other GenAI tools?
Or didn't you test any of them, including Infinity? If so, you should definitely give Infinity a try and also compare it at least to ChatGPT!
Saving Changes...
Sean AdamsPM I| Harvey NashLexington, Ky, United States
I find Infinity is very tailored to PMI content as would be expected. Others are more general.
...
1 reply by Vincenzo Mosca
Feb 07, 2024 2:10 AM
Vincenzo Mosca
...
Thanks Sean. It is true. But sometimes I had the feeling that ChatGPT gives outstanding responses too given its access to a broader content. Of course, in terms of trustworthiness, I prefer Infinity
I find Infinity is very tailored to PMI content as would be expected. Others are more general.
Thanks Sean. It is true. But sometimes I had the feeling that ChatGPT gives outstanding responses too given its access to a broader content. Of course, in terms of trustworthiness, I prefer Infinity Saving Changes...
Do you mean you didn't test other GenAI tools?
Or didn't you test any of them, including Infinity? If so, you should definitely give Infinity a try and also compare it at least to ChatGPT! Saving Changes...
