Chris YeagerSystems Analyst - Public Safety| City of Murfreesboro
One the key aspects of expertise is industry knowledge and how it is utilized in the field. With the onset of AI being broadly used across industries, there are concerns that expertise will be less important than efficiency and cost. How will organizations incorporate AI in their PM certifications and training without a reduction in industry knowledge and expertise? Saving Changes...
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Chris, I don't think incorporating AI will by any means affect industry knowledge or undermine expertise. On the contrary, I feel it will complement them if properly presented. One thing I would suggest is incorporating real-world case studies and practical applications of AI in project management into training programs and I know PMI's third AI course which they are working on might contain lots of those. By demonstrating how AI technologies can be effectively utilized within specific industries, professionals can better understand the practical implications and benefits of integrating AI into their work. Saving Changes...
Chris YeagerSystems Analyst - Public Safety| City of Murfreesboro
Rami, I will have to disagree on this. AI has already had an impact in other industries/sectors, eroding the value of expertise. Writers, students, content creators, and others are now competing with individuals who have no background and are not producing their own work in the marketplace. There are enough people in the market who have no reservations about presenting something as their work which was done by someone else, now they can just use a program. There are already policies, laws, and regulations being considered on how to know if content is coming from an AI engine or not because of this issue. While I agree that the proper utilization of AI can complement the knowledge and expertise of PM professionals, I believe that it is far too easy to cross the line and let AI do all the work. On a different scale, this is much like math teachers not allowing students to use their phones or calculators during a test. You are expected to show how you get the answers. AI allows people to take the test with the calculator but still present the work as their own. My concern is that this will lead to people going into the field with the bare minimum knowledge, utilizing AI to make up for their lack, and present the work as an "expert" when it was created by AI. I will be interested to see how this impacts the industry over the next 3 to 5 years.
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Apr 02, 2024 6:56 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Chris, it's completely fine to disagree as we might not see eye to eye on everything. Let me clarify few things:
1) Those with no background in AI, have to educate themselves or they will be left behind be it individuals or organizations. In today's world, professional development is more of a necessity than an option.
2) In terms of posts, I do agree with you and I see lots of people putting full posts on LI for example and they are a copy and paste from platforms like ChatGPT. For me, if there is no reference and they claim it's their own work then this is not ethical. I guess for now, we have to carry ourselves with our values and ethics, but if some chose not to, then this will be short lived success. Sooner or later, they will be exposed.
Like you said, AI is still in it's infancy and a lot yet remain to be discovered so I am also curious to see how AI and its consequences will impact the different industries in both, the near and long terms futures.
I think spotting the fake expert will become more important as AI permeates industries.
People have been plagiarizing forever, and they get caught with some regularity, in part due to the search tools of today. Like with plagiarizing a paper, using AI for an answer with minimal actual knowledge of the subject is easy to spot once you start asking difficult questions. There are already tools used to identify AI generated material with mixed results but I am sure they will improve.
I can spot a lot of AI content and may or may not read it since I know the person presenting it is cutting and pasting. Lawyers get caught using AI when it cites cases that don't exist and someone tries to look them up. For those who expect genuine quality rather than fast and cheap but seriously flawed, real experts may be elevated in their positions for being able to spot the fakes by asking the right questions to determine whether the person presenting it actually understands the subject, and whether their methods should be trusted..
...
1 reply by Chris Yeager
Apr 08, 2024 9:54 AM
Chris Yeager
...
I agree, Keith. Spotting the fakes is important, but is it possible? Many experts in the field of AI have said spotting the differences is nearly impossible if someone knows how to use the AI well. While I believe AI work can be spotted in some instances, as the use of AI progresses, and the design of AI improves, this will become more and more difficult. As Bhasker mentioned in point 7 of his post, ethical considerations are necessary to the proper training and certification process.
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Apr 02, 2024 4:19 PM
Replying to Chris Yeager
...
Rami, I will have to disagree on this. AI has already had an impact in other industries/sectors, eroding the value of expertise. Writers, students, content creators, and others are now competing with individuals who have no background and are not producing their own work in the marketplace. There are enough people in the market who have no reservations about presenting something as their work which was done by someone else, now they can just use a program. There are already policies, laws, and regulations being considered on how to know if content is coming from an AI engine or not because of this issue. While I agree that the proper utilization of AI can complement the knowledge and expertise of PM professionals, I believe that it is far too easy to cross the line and let AI do all the work. On a different scale, this is much like math teachers not allowing students to use their phones or calculators during a test. You are expected to show how you get the answers. AI allows people to take the test with the calculator but still present the work as their own. My concern is that this will lead to people going into the field with the bare minimum knowledge, utilizing AI to make up for their lack, and present the work as an "expert" when it was created by AI. I will be interested to see how this impacts the industry over the next 3 to 5 years.
Chris, it's completely fine to disagree as we might not see eye to eye on everything. Let me clarify few things:
1) Those with no background in AI, have to educate themselves or they will be left behind be it individuals or organizations. In today's world, professional development is more of a necessity than an option.
2) In terms of posts, I do agree with you and I see lots of people putting full posts on LI for example and they are a copy and paste from platforms like ChatGPT. For me, if there is no reference and they claim it's their own work then this is not ethical. I guess for now, we have to carry ourselves with our values and ethics, but if some chose not to, then this will be short lived success. Sooner or later, they will be exposed.
Like you said, AI is still in it's infancy and a lot yet remain to be discovered so I am also curious to see how AI and its consequences will impact the different industries in both, the near and long terms futures.
...
1 reply by Vivaoliva Shoo
Apr 07, 2024 11:21 AM
Vivaoliva Shoo
...
AI is universe technology innovation concern to all industry. It necessary to be a Human Resource and Procurement concern when recruiting professional or experts. This should be done:-
1. In the application link, AI detection tool or system should be used
2. Submitting a written document is one thing but when it comes to the practical point of view and vivid experiences sharing, definitely a difference will be obvious.
3. I presume that so far AI has not explored an automated PM template/ tools where non professional could use to back him or her in the application
4. AI will take ages remain at the space as creativity and innovation is evolving endless
Saving Changes...
Vivaoliva ShooConsultant | NexGen E- Consulting Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic Of
Apr 02, 2024 6:56 PM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
Chris, it's completely fine to disagree as we might not see eye to eye on everything. Let me clarify few things:
1) Those with no background in AI, have to educate themselves or they will be left behind be it individuals or organizations. In today's world, professional development is more of a necessity than an option.
2) In terms of posts, I do agree with you and I see lots of people putting full posts on LI for example and they are a copy and paste from platforms like ChatGPT. For me, if there is no reference and they claim it's their own work then this is not ethical. I guess for now, we have to carry ourselves with our values and ethics, but if some chose not to, then this will be short lived success. Sooner or later, they will be exposed.
Like you said, AI is still in it's infancy and a lot yet remain to be discovered so I am also curious to see how AI and its consequences will impact the different industries in both, the near and long terms futures.
AI is universe technology innovation concern to all industry. It necessary to be a Human Resource and Procurement concern when recruiting professional or experts. This should be done:-
1. In the application link, AI detection tool or system should be used
2. Submitting a written document is one thing but when it comes to the practical point of view and vivid experiences sharing, definitely a difference will be obvious.
3. I presume that so far AI has not explored an automated PM template/ tools where non professional could use to back him or her in the application
4. AI will take ages remain at the space as creativity and innovation is evolving endless
...
1 reply by Chris Yeager
Apr 08, 2024 9:21 AM
Chris Yeager
...
Good points, Vivaoliva. There needs to be a great deal of caution and clarity implementing AI technology in any professional environment. I am concerned that the technology to protect against the abuse of AI in many sectors will always be behind the AI technology itself.
Saving Changes...
George FreemanThought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
Chris,
I take a critic’s position on AI-generated content and tools as I recognize that it has as much opportunity to improve society as it can damage it. The direction it takes will hinge on education and transparency, which, from my barometer, is scarcely available.
I recognize that AI-generated content and tooling can supercharge plagiarists and bad actors, but my greater concern is the societal consequences of “Epistemic Erosion.” Specifically, the [1] dilution of knowledge and the [2] obfuscation of, or ability to determine truth.
Unless transparency-formed guard rails are “put into place,” this erosion will/could be gradual, dismissable, and controllable.
Hopefully, my perception of this risk is malformed. But even a chance of it being true justifies a critic’s voice.
George
...
2 replies by Bhasker Srivastava and Chris Yeager
Apr 08, 2024 9:28 AM
Chris Yeager
...
Excellent points, George. Your statement, "Specifically, the [1] dilution of knowledge and the [2] obfuscation of, or ability to determine truth," hits at the center of the problem. The point of training, certification, and continuing education is to reach a level of expertise. If AI is leverage by some to shortcut that process, potentially undermining the profession episodically.
Apr 12, 2024 3:13 AM
Bhasker Srivastava
...
I take a critic’s position on AI-generated content and tools as I recognize that it has as much opportunity to improve society as it can damage it. The direction it takes will hinge on education and transparency, which, from my barometer, is scarcely available.
I recognize that AI-generated content and tooling can supercharge plagiarists and bad actors, but my greater concern is the societal consequences of “Epistemic Erosion.” Specifically, the [1] dilution of knowledge and the [2] obfuscation of, or ability to determine truth.
Unless transparency-formed guard rails are “put into place,” this erosion will/could be gradual, dismissable, and controllable.
Hopefully, my perception of this risk is malformed. But even a chance of it being true justifies a critic’s voice.
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico.Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
AI will improve and mature over time and calibrate to minimize these situations. I believe that the best thing is to start using it on a small scale to obtain the desired results and avoid the consequences you mentioned.
...
1 reply by Chris Yeager
Apr 08, 2024 9:46 AM
Chris Yeager
...
I agree, Francisco. Wading into the water slowly with AI would be better, but it seems the world is diving in without checking the water first. We will have to wait and see how it fares in the coming years.
Here's how AI can be integrated into PM certifications and training:
1. AI-Powered Learning Platforms
Utilizing AI algorithms to personalize learning paths based on individual strengths and weaknesses.
Providing real-time feedback and suggestions for improvement.
2. Virtual AI Assistants for PM Professionals
Implementing virtual AI assistants to help PM practitioners with tasks like scheduling, resource allocation, and risk management.
Offering insights and recommendations based on data analysis performed by AI algorithms.
3. AI-Driven Predictive Analytics
Teaching PM professionals how to leverage AI-driven predictive analytics for better project forecasting and risk assessment.
Training on interpreting AI-generated insights to make informed decisions and adjustments during project execution.
4. Simulation and Scenario Analysis
Incorporating AI-powered simulation tools for realistic scenario analysis in training programs.
Allowing PM students to simulate different project scenarios and learn from the outcomes predicted by AI models.
5. Enhanced Data Management
Training on AI tools for enhanced data management, including data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
Integrating AI techniques for data-driven decision-making throughout the project lifecycle.
6. Continuous Learning and Adaptation
Emphasizing the importance of continuous learning and adaptation to AI advancements in PM practices.
Providing up-to-date training materials and resources to keep PM professionals informed about the latest AI technologies relevant to their field.
7. Ethical AI Considerations
Including modules on ethical AI considerations in PM training to ensure responsible use of AI tools in project management.
Addressing potential biases in AI algorithms and promoting transparency and fairness in decision-making processes.
By integrating AI into PM certifications and training, professionals can stay ahead of the curve, improve project outcomes, and adapt to the increasingly digital landscape of project management.
...
2 replies by Chris Yeager and George Freeman
Apr 08, 2024 9:44 AM
Chris Yeager
...
Solid summary, Bhasker. Those are all appropriate ways for AI to be utilized to instill and improve professional expertise in program management. However, these all have two things in common: they require stringent oversight and they do not replace the work of a human being. Several industries are already struggling with this issue and being hard pressed to distinguish between the work of a person and a machine. There was a commercial during the Super Bowl in the USA for Microsoft's new Copilot AI program. It showed several different people in different professional contexts saying, "They told me I couldn't do it," or something similar. They then flashed forward to each of them using Copilot to do the work for them as a song plays with the words, "Watch me now" repeating. This is the lie of AI. They didn't build something, create something, design something, code something. AI did that work and they are appropriating it as their own, with the stamp of approval from Microsoft.
Apr 08, 2024 10:26 AM
George Freeman
...
Bhasker,
As much as I appreciate your engagement on this subject, your reply matches the “pattern and substance” of content produced by GenAI. When you use this type of content in whole or in part in a post, it is appropriate to disclaim that fact.
I agree with Chris that those are valid points, but please recognize that those points are only a few keystrokes away from us (as well). If the points add value to the discussion, just state, “Here’s what ChatGPT has to say on this subject,” or something like that.
Please recognize that this is an informed assumption on my part and that we appreciate your engagement!
George
Saving Changes...
Chris YeagerSystems Analyst - Public Safety| City of Murfreesboro
Apr 07, 2024 11:21 AM
Replying to Vivaoliva Shoo
...
AI is universe technology innovation concern to all industry. It necessary to be a Human Resource and Procurement concern when recruiting professional or experts. This should be done:-
1. In the application link, AI detection tool or system should be used
2. Submitting a written document is one thing but when it comes to the practical point of view and vivid experiences sharing, definitely a difference will be obvious.
3. I presume that so far AI has not explored an automated PM template/ tools where non professional could use to back him or her in the application
4. AI will take ages remain at the space as creativity and innovation is evolving endless
Good points, Vivaoliva. There needs to be a great deal of caution and clarity implementing AI technology in any professional environment. I am concerned that the technology to protect against the abuse of AI in many sectors will always be behind the AI technology itself. Saving Changes...
Chris YeagerSystems Analyst - Public Safety| City of Murfreesboro
Apr 07, 2024 11:43 PM
Replying to George Freeman
...
Chris,
I take a critic’s position on AI-generated content and tools as I recognize that it has as much opportunity to improve society as it can damage it. The direction it takes will hinge on education and transparency, which, from my barometer, is scarcely available.
I recognize that AI-generated content and tooling can supercharge plagiarists and bad actors, but my greater concern is the societal consequences of “Epistemic Erosion.” Specifically, the [1] dilution of knowledge and the [2] obfuscation of, or ability to determine truth.
Unless transparency-formed guard rails are “put into place,” this erosion will/could be gradual, dismissable, and controllable.
Hopefully, my perception of this risk is malformed. But even a chance of it being true justifies a critic’s voice.
George
Excellent points, George. Your statement, "Specifically, the [1] dilution of knowledge and the [2] obfuscation of, or ability to determine truth," hits at the center of the problem. The point of training, certification, and continuing education is to reach a level of expertise. If AI is leverage by some to shortcut that process, potentially undermining the profession episodically. Saving Changes...