Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Embracing Innovation and Utilizing Technology in Construction Projects

linkedin twitter facebook   Construction   Innovation  
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Technology and innovation have the potential to revolutionize the construction industry, yet widespread adoption often faces significant barriers. What barriers do you see preventing wider adoption of technology and innovation in the construction sector, and how can they be overcome?
Sort By:
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
I will kick-off this thread by touching on on e of the biggest barriers which is resistance to change. In the past, Construction has traditionally been slow to adopt new technologies due to its conservative nature (things are moving better these days) due to the fact that many stakeholders are resistant to change because of the perceived risks associated with new methods or technologies.

In order to overcome this barrier, you need to ensure to demonstrate the value of technology investments through case studies and if feasible, through pilot projects as well which can help alleviate concerns about upfront costs and convince stakeholders of the benefits of adopting new technologies.
avatar
Aung Sint
Community Champion
Lead Consultant| Laminar Projects
Government initiatives and support go a long way as well. For example, in Singapore, the government encourages adopting new technology in construction, even making it mandatory where necessary.
avatar
William M Hayden Jr Adjunct Assistant Professor| University at Buffalo, School of Management, Operations Management & Strategy Buffalo, Ny, United States
Thanks for this Rami!

Re: "one of the biggest barriers which is resistance to change."

This perfectly human behavior is universal, with the rarest of exceptions.

Suggestion:
To learn more about why, what, and how to first understand, and then
lead a change initiative:

Go to your university (or Google) on-line library and search using:
<> Kurt Lewin

Cheers,
Bill
avatar
Mike Frenette Manager, IT PMO| Halifax Water (retired) Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Construction is such a physical environment that is is sometimes hard for those who have been doing the same things successfully for years to see how the application of technology would help change things for the better, However, I think once advanced technology such as digital twins, robotics, AI and physical assistance such as what is happening with drones could see a big shift in acceptance and use. Collaboration is a big deal as well, in terms of virtual tools available and even just approaches, such as the "Big Room" approach that brings construction professionals together. Training in assembly and maintenance of equipment can be made virtual and on demand with VR. I recall seeing a video a few years back of a large machine "printing" girders for buildings. Impressive! And there is so much more.

But to address your question about reticence to change, it is probably the same old change management (or lack of) story: Low awareness, lack of skills and knowledge, little direction from the top, and a desire to remain with the skills learned in univertisty or while apprenticing. After all, that is what has kept earning. When the constrution companies adopt new techology, probably because of the profit motive, those in architecture, engineering and the trades won't have any choice but to adopt and adapt.

There may also be a resistance to straying outside of established education in construction such as engineering and architectural disciplines, apprenticeship and credentialing such as LEEDS and Red Seal. Although I think the PMI-CP, or Construction Professional, is making some headway.
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
May 12, 2024 1:42 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Mike, you make some very good points. I think many are too comfortable with the current ways of working to the degree that they have a fear of change when it comes to technology and they raise so many “What-Ifs”!
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
May 12, 2024 11:10 AM
Replying to Mike Frenette
...
Construction is such a physical environment that is is sometimes hard for those who have been doing the same things successfully for years to see how the application of technology would help change things for the better, However, I think once advanced technology such as digital twins, robotics, AI and physical assistance such as what is happening with drones could see a big shift in acceptance and use. Collaboration is a big deal as well, in terms of virtual tools available and even just approaches, such as the "Big Room" approach that brings construction professionals together. Training in assembly and maintenance of equipment can be made virtual and on demand with VR. I recall seeing a video a few years back of a large machine "printing" girders for buildings. Impressive! And there is so much more.

But to address your question about reticence to change, it is probably the same old change management (or lack of) story: Low awareness, lack of skills and knowledge, little direction from the top, and a desire to remain with the skills learned in univertisty or while apprenticing. After all, that is what has kept earning. When the constrution companies adopt new techology, probably because of the profit motive, those in architecture, engineering and the trades won't have any choice but to adopt and adapt.

There may also be a resistance to straying outside of established education in construction such as engineering and architectural disciplines, apprenticeship and credentialing such as LEEDS and Red Seal. Although I think the PMI-CP, or Construction Professional, is making some headway.
Mike, you make some very good points. I think many are too comfortable with the current ways of working to the degree that they have a fear of change when it comes to technology and they raise so many “What-Ifs”!
avatar
Keith Novak Tukwila, Wa, United States
I think there is a big difference whether you are talking about the business professional side of construction, or the skilled labor. Learning a trade often starts with limited education and then a many year progression from apprentice, to journeyman, etc. I have seen an attitude of fear that technology will replace long practiced skills, particularly when dealing with people who have 20+ years experience in their trade..

You still see that in business roles as well such as large companies where people can make a career out of running certain archaic programs, but typically office technology changes frequently enough that people become more accustomed to doing things a different (even if not better) way.. Swinging a hammer by contrast hasn't evolved much in my lifetime.

What I have found critical to getting over the hesitation over some technology innovations in non-office environments is assuring people that they won't get less hours on the clock and they time they do work will be less frustrating than what they currently complain about all day.
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
May 12, 2024 11:23 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Keith, you nailed it and I couldn’t agree more with you. However, this reassurance about working hours is a tough call because for some trades (brick laying for example), their will be reduction in hours if robotics were utilized!
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
May 12, 2024 6:18 PM
Replying to Keith Novak
...
I think there is a big difference whether you are talking about the business professional side of construction, or the skilled labor. Learning a trade often starts with limited education and then a many year progression from apprentice, to journeyman, etc. I have seen an attitude of fear that technology will replace long practiced skills, particularly when dealing with people who have 20+ years experience in their trade..

You still see that in business roles as well such as large companies where people can make a career out of running certain archaic programs, but typically office technology changes frequently enough that people become more accustomed to doing things a different (even if not better) way.. Swinging a hammer by contrast hasn't evolved much in my lifetime.

What I have found critical to getting over the hesitation over some technology innovations in non-office environments is assuring people that they won't get less hours on the clock and they time they do work will be less frustrating than what they currently complain about all day.
Keith, you nailed it and I couldn’t agree more with you. However, this reassurance about working hours is a tough call because for some trades (brick laying for example), their will be reduction in hours if robotics were utilized!
avatar
William M Hayden Jr Adjunct Assistant Professor| University at Buffalo, School of Management, Operations Management & Strategy Buffalo, Ny, United States
To one & All:
To actually move from "Discussing Change" and then enacting it,
we need an objective and its associated strategies.

A place to start that journey would be to first identify the "Driving Forces" for that change,
and the "Restraining Forces" that frustrate such.

A guide for this thinking:
"Planned Change" by Gilmore Crosby, 2021.
Cheers,
Bill
p.s. I usually go right to abebooks.com to review prices.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

I'd rather be a failure at something I love, than a success at something I hate.

- George Burns

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors