William M Hayden JrAdjunct Assistant Professor| University at Buffalo, School of Management, Operations Management & StrategyBuffalo, Ny, United States
Thanks, Oraib!
Referring to a group of people assigned to work together as a "Team" is premature.
First, there need to be evidence of teamwork.
And one would expect a PM to help facilitate that process.
Cheers,
Bill Saving Changes...
I see no issue with a project manager providing support to the team. As a servant leader, it is our responsibility to offer assistance whenever necessary. If I find myself in the role of the captain of a ship, and the team is engaged in rescuing a sinking vessel, I would undoubtedly stand alongside them rather than remain in the control room. However, this decision must be made with careful consideration of risk management. Leaving the control room should only occur if it does not significantly increase the risk to the overall outcome. Moreover, there may be instances where taking certain risks is necessary, particularly when the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks, such as in matters of life and death, or in the workplace, maybe it is related to "Karoshi" (death from overwork). Ultimately, it is about striking a balance and doing what is morally and practically right in the given circumstances. Saving Changes...
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Oraib, as a PM, you are the servant leader for the team and should provide support and assistance as needed be it by helping with tasks yourself or bringing on more external support! Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
I made this lot of times. In fact, it could be good to be proactive in this matter just in case is needed. It is not recommendable, but it could be possible. But it is key to make visible that you are trying to help, so thing like "the team assign you tasks" is unacceptable. At the end nobody assign tasks to nobody in a project. Tasks are taking by the right people. Saving Changes...
It is one thing for a PM to step in when there is a crisis of some kind on the project as an extra pair of hands, but to plan to do so from the get go is creating a situation where the PM's attention is divided between their primary responsibility and this work. In such cases, I have always escalated the situation to leadership educating them on the risks of doing so and ensuring they are taking responsibility for the realization of these risks should they wish to proceed.
Running projects with insufficient talent is an all too common symptom of low organizational maturity in delivering projects.
Kiron Bondale ,kindly allow me to disagree with your answer. In the PMP exam, we don't easily escalate something that a project manager can control to senior management. The Project Manager needs to develop relevant skills to address certain levels of issues, lead the project, empower team, and remove obstacles for their success. Escalating issues like "the team is busy" may not align with PMP best practices, as it's typically within the project manager's realm to manage team workload efficiently without involving senior management unnecessarily.
...
1 reply by Kiron Bondale
Apr 09, 2024 1:24 PM
Kiron Bondale
...
Danny -
And that is why the PMP exam bears little connection to what happens in real life. Having written questions for the PMP exam three times going back to the early 2000s, the perspective has always been of a PM with sufficient political or formal authority to be able to make a significant percentage of decisions on their own.
This is NOT the reality in many industries and organizations, especially those where the project is run within a balanced matrix, weak matrix or functional organizational structure.
I think it really depends on the type of help and the circumstances. I won't schedule and run other people's meetings order their lunches or other administrative tasks, but if I am planning a major project review I may help with all of those things to get through the short-term burst of intense activity. To help facilitate my group's cross-team coordination, I have no problem calling the important stakeholders to ensure they will attend key activities in support of other groups. I will even provide some actual engineering support on occasion when I am the only one who knows how to perform some important analysis.
In small fast paced teams, I might act as both head chef and dishwasher depending on what's required. I've sometimes been labeled as someone who leads from the front for my willingness to dig in and get my hands dirty as opposed to an armchair general who sits back and barks orders. I'm not going to do other people's core job functions, but sometimes lending a hand saves a lot of time, effort, and builds a stronger team mentality where elevation would just add to the delay and generate hostility. Saving Changes...
Omar JabbarProject Management and Digital Transformation Consultant| OGreen IT Service Inc.Ontario, Canada
Yes, assigning tasks to the project manager is crucial for the effective handling of escalation, issues, and risks. These are critical aspects that cannot be left unaddressed. It's important to trust the project manager to take charge and deliver successful results. Failure to do so could result in serious consequences for the project.
Use the RACI Matrix, to define all aspects of your resources. Its clear and concise layout allows for streamlined two-way communication among project team members. Saving Changes...
Kiron Bondale ,kindly allow me to disagree with your answer. In the PMP exam, we don't easily escalate something that a project manager can control to senior management. The Project Manager needs to develop relevant skills to address certain levels of issues, lead the project, empower team, and remove obstacles for their success. Escalating issues like "the team is busy" may not align with PMP best practices, as it's typically within the project manager's realm to manage team workload efficiently without involving senior management unnecessarily.
Danny -
And that is why the PMP exam bears little connection to what happens in real life. Having written questions for the PMP exam three times going back to the early 2000s, the perspective has always been of a PM with sufficient political or formal authority to be able to make a significant percentage of decisions on their own.
This is NOT the reality in many industries and organizations, especially those where the project is run within a balanced matrix, weak matrix or functional organizational structure.
Kiron
...
2 replies by Danny PMP, PgMP and Oraib Nawash
Apr 09, 2024 6:16 PM
Danny PMP, PgMP
...
Kiron Bondale ,it seems like there is some misunderstandings with PMP latest content. Additionally, discussing something that occurred 20 years ago may not be relevant, as it could be based on outdated content or suggestions. Although the Project Management Professional (PMP) certification might be scenario-based, Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) or PMP is not authored by one or two individuals, instead, it is a collective body of knowledge based on the best practices recommended by experts, which grounded in real-life best practices, especially in the latest version.
Having recently passed the PMP & PRINCE2 project management certifications, I'd like to share some insights. A Project Manager indeed has the authority to make some significant decisions independently, starting with the official acceptance of the project charter or project brief, according to PMP and PRINCE2 best practices. Neither certification suggests escalating issues to senior management simply because the team is busy, as managing team workload efficiently falls within the project manager's domain. Unless it is necessary.
In real life, project managers must lead the project and be familiar with project resources, including stakeholders, scope, cost and time. Therefore, they need to develop relevant skills to address various issues and balance the constraints. While it's common to encounter busy teams in real-life scenarios, it's essential for leaders, including project managers, to learn how to balance resources effectively. Escalating every busy issue to leadership is not always necessary unless there is a compelling reason. Even in organizations where project managers have weaker influence, managing resources is a skill they should be familiar with.
To summarize, project managers need to develop the skills to address issues, lead project, empower team, and remove obstacles for project success. Escalating issues like "the team is busy" may not align with PMP best practices, as managing time, scope, and other resources efficiently is a skill everyone needs to learn in life. Before resorting to escalation, it's crucial to strike a balance and learn how to effectively manage available resources. In real-life situations, every scenario may vary, making it even more important to apply best practices, particularly regarding essential skills such as resource allocation, whether in the workplace or in personal life.
Apr 16, 2024 2:39 PM
Oraib Nawash
...
I agree with you Kiron. In project management real world, the structure of the organization. Years ago, I worked in organizations that in transition phase, they managed projects in a centralized manner by departments where there was no role at all to project managers. When I joined, the position was just created, and I had to escalate too many issues to the upper management as they need to know everything, and they still have the context of centralized management.
And that is why the PMP exam bears little connection to what happens in real life. Having written questions for the PMP exam three times going back to the early 2000s, the perspective has always been of a PM with sufficient political or formal authority to be able to make a significant percentage of decisions on their own.
This is NOT the reality in many industries and organizations, especially those where the project is run within a balanced matrix, weak matrix or functional organizational structure.
Kiron
Kiron Bondale ,it seems like there is some misunderstandings with PMP latest content. Additionally, discussing something that occurred 20 years ago may not be relevant, as it could be based on outdated content or suggestions. Although the Project Management Professional (PMP) certification might be scenario-based, Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) or PMP is not authored by one or two individuals, instead, it is a collective body of knowledge based on the best practices recommended by experts, which grounded in real-life best practices, especially in the latest version.
Having recently passed the PMP & PRINCE2 project management certifications, I'd like to share some insights. A Project Manager indeed has the authority to make some significant decisions independently, starting with the official acceptance of the project charter or project brief, according to PMP and PRINCE2 best practices. Neither certification suggests escalating issues to senior management simply because the team is busy, as managing team workload efficiently falls within the project manager's domain. Unless it is necessary.
In real life, project managers must lead the project and be familiar with project resources, including stakeholders, scope, cost and time. Therefore, they need to develop relevant skills to address various issues and balance the constraints. While it's common to encounter busy teams in real-life scenarios, it's essential for leaders, including project managers, to learn how to balance resources effectively. Escalating every busy issue to leadership is not always necessary unless there is a compelling reason. Even in organizations where project managers have weaker influence, managing resources is a skill they should be familiar with.
To summarize, project managers need to develop the skills to address issues, lead project, empower team, and remove obstacles for project success. Escalating issues like "the team is busy" may not align with PMP best practices, as managing time, scope, and other resources efficiently is a skill everyone needs to learn in life. Before resorting to escalation, it's crucial to strike a balance and learn how to effectively manage available resources. In real-life situations, every scenario may vary, making it even more important to apply best practices, particularly regarding essential skills such as resource allocation, whether in the workplace or in personal life.
...
1 reply by Kiron Bondale
Apr 10, 2024 7:57 AM
Kiron Bondale
...
Danny -
My final word on this is the following.
Although escalation should not be a PM's first course of action, the inability to escalate in a timely manner has been a cause of many project issues that I've witnessed over my career. And I have worked in a number of organizations where PMs were extremely limited in their ability to manage resources and had to lean on their sponsors to help them out. That had nothing to do with their skills or ability to influence but rather the relative power of the PM role to functional managers.
"In the real world, the right thing never happens in the right place and the right time. It is the job of journalists and historians to make it appear that it has."