If IA should be used to improve the decision process not to fire persons, how to isolate the thinking way of persons whose ideas has been rejected for many persons?
Francisco ToroIT Consultant| Gestion Informatica Ltda.Bogota, Dc, Colombia
3. Decision making Saving Changes...
Sort By:
George FreemanThought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
Francisco,
As I have no choice but to interpret your question since you can derive varied contextual meanings from it, such is also true for what I believe is the premised thought behind your question.
The creative novel thinking of a human resides in the abstract, where context has no footing since nothing yet exists. Hence, an “intelligent agent” (in current and near future realized forms) cannot isolate its validity or value. Thus, it would offer nothing functional to the decision process of a human for any purpose.
That said, an “intelligent agent,” if queried, would likely provide an opinion nonetheless, putting the responsibility to recognize the fallibility of the generated content on the human—now we are in trouble.
I don't know anything about your decision making process but you need to develop a consensus algorithm for how differing inputs are addressed.
A simple example would be that if two inputs agree and one does not, the third input is ignored and potentially a notification is provided that there was a conflict. If you don't want to completely ignore the input, you could provide weighting factors for inputs. Depending on what data you have, the weighting factors could be generated by AI based on who's inputs agree with past decisions, or assigned manually. Saving Changes...
