Quality over quantity...

Kiron Bondale As a newcomer to this community, I understand the eagerness to start new discussions. However, I encourage fewer, thoughtful, and unique posts instead of shallow or frequently discussed ones. Multiple posts in a short time from the same member can discourage responses. I have similar thoughts about repeated questions—even my own posts sometimes. Occasionally, we receive notifications with previous links, (Kimberly Whitby) which can be helpful for referencing different perspectives and ideas already shared on similar topics.

Laura Schofield With AI growing daily, is there a way to control repeating topics in the future? For instance, if someone tries to post a topic that already exists, could they receive an automatic notification or suggested links to refer to? This could help both newcomers and experienced members find relevant discussions before creating new ones. A system like this might make interactions more engaging and informative for everyone.

Additionally, A simple guide for new members on dos and don’ts like checking for similar topics before posting and focusing on meaningful replies could help. A friendly welcome message with these tips would make it easier for everyone to engage better.

Kiron Bondale: It’s not only you, I too see this besides the repetitive questions that are AI related.

I’ve been suggesting to PMI to do post moderation for a while now (Just like we do on our PMI LinkedIn Group by filtering the posts, and releasing one every hour or two from different members) but so far nothing happened.

Dear Kiron Bondale
Absolutely agree — quality conversations are the lifeblood of any professional community.
I see great value in encouraging thoughtful contributions that add depth and perspective, especially when they build upon or challenge existing ideas with clarity and respect.
That said, I also try to welcome newcomers with patience.
Sometimes, high post frequency comes from enthusiasm rather than intent to overwhelm.
A gentle nudge — like your post — helps set the tone for meaningful dialogue.
Communities thrive not only through quality, but also through inclusion and growth.
Striking that balance is key.

Thanks for sharing your perspective, Rami Kaibni
I fully agree that curating quality is vital — especially in professional communities. But so is ensuring transparency and inclusivity in how moderation is applied.

In spaces where moderation is active, it's equally important to clearly communicate why certain posts are held back or rejected.
Without that, we risk discouraging thoughtful contributions and innovation — particularly around emerging topics like AI, which often challenge the status quo and need open, structured dialogue.

Perhaps the solution lies not in more moderation, but in better guidance, clearer standards, and visible encouragement for emerging voices to participate meaningfully.

I’d welcome a broader conversation on how we find the right balance between curation and censorship, especially as our field — and the technologies shaping it — continue to evolve so quickly.

Thanks for your thoughtful reply, Md. Golam Rob Talukdar .
I completely agree — quality discussions truly are the foundation of deeper learning and community growth.
At the same time, I also believe we have an opportunity to guide and encourage newer members, especially those eager to contribute but still learning what thoughtful participation looks like in this space.
Sometimes, quantity comes from enthusiasm — not from intent to overwhelm.
If we can channel that energy with positive guidance and inclusive standards, we strengthen the community on both fronts: quality and participation.
Really appreciate seeing this dialogue — it’s how communities evolve with both integrity and generosity.

Thank you for your message, Laura Schofield — and for your leadership in shaping a space that values inclusion and dialogue.
I truly appreciate the effort to enhance the platform and address some of the structural challenges, like duplicate posts and discoverability.
That said, I believe this is also a unique moment to reframe how we welcome and orient new voices.
Many newer members are eager to contribute, but may not yet know how to engage meaningfully within an established community.
Instead of only filtering or consolidating, perhaps we could also explore gentle onboarding cues:
-pinned threads that highlight current active discussions,
- a “Start Here” post to guide first-time contributors,
- or even light-touch mentoring from experienced members.

This way, we don’t just reduce noise — we transform enthusiasm into quality, and protect both the integrity and the vitality of the community.

Looking forward to the evolution of this space — and happy to contribute to the process however I can

Welcome back, Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD — it’s great to see you here again!
Your contributions over the years have set a high bar for thoughtful, practice-driven discussions.
It’s no surprise that you’d recognize this as a recurring theme — quality, curation, and community dynamics seem to cycle back as we evolve.
That said, your presence reminds us of the value of continuity: voices like yours help bridge the experience of long-time contributors with the fresh perspectives of newer members.
Hoping this is more than just a passing hello — the community always benefits when seasoned musketeers like you return to the conversation.
Looking forward to your insights once again!