Meetings serve as a space for decision-making, alignment of expectations, and problem-solving in real-time. However, many meetings are inefficient and could be replaced with asynchronous communication tools such as emails, task management boards (Trello, Jira, Asana), and well-structured messages in Teams or WhatsApp work groups. With this environment of well-structured and highly effective asynchronous communication, is it possible to carry out the project without meetings? Saving Changes...
While it is certainly possible, I wouldn't consider it efficient or effective given that written communication is much more susceptible to misinterpretation, confusion, and error than verbal communication.
While a team which has worked together over a period of time can certainly significantly reduce meetings in favor of other methods of communicating with one another, collaborative work is often better done synchronously, whether in person or using virtual tools such as Miro and Mural.
And as far as stakeholders who are not involved on a daily basis with the team, interactions are much better done via 1:1 or group meetings to avoid confusion.
While many types of activities can be done efficiently asynchronously, many others cannot. While people may think they're being efficient, really they're wasting a lot of time multitasking and trying to piece various pieces of asynchronous information together.
In the study of distributed computing systems, I learned that they work much the same way as a project team breaking up large problems into smaller ones, distributing the tasks, and piecing the results back together. Humans however do many of the required tasks much less efficiently. We don't switch between tasks efficiently. We must piece together many threads where one message generated multiple responses on different subtasks. We don't build consensus well based on many fragmented inputs.
One of the classic examples I've witnessed is with people who insist on working almost exclusively via digital communication who complain that they spent hours drafting the appropriate response to a coworker. That coworker sat 10 feet away and that communication could have taken 5 minutes or less verbally or face-to-face, including clearing up any miscommunications during the exchange. Saving Changes...
Asynchronous tools improve efficiency, but completely eliminating meetings isn’t ideal. Complex discussions, decision-making, and team alignment often require real-time interaction. A balanced approach works best—use async for updates and routine tasks, but keep meetings for critical discussions, brainstorming, and resolving blockers efficiently.
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Veronica, I do certainly agree with Kiron. In construction for example, it is hard to go through the design phase without design coordination meetings, otherwise you will end up with an enormous amount of change orders due to discrepancies. Saving Changes...
Project & PMO Manager | Research & Enterprise Mentor| GFB HoldingSouth America, Brazil
Good afternoon, that is a really good question. It's unlikely to eliminate meetings entirely, but you can significantly reduce their frequency and improve their efficiency. Shift the focus from using meetings to discuss the next meeting, and instead prioritize concise briefs.
I sugest that, for each meeting, prepare a brief containing objectives, agenda, pre-meeting reading, and expected outcomes. Leverage online tools like shared documents (Google Docs, Notion) or project management software to pre-align information, collect feedback, and clarify discussion points before the meeting. To ensure valuable discussions, clearly define the purpose of each meeting and use asynchronous channels for routine updates or information dissemination. Implement a system of actionable notes and decisions after each meeting, readily accessible to all participants.
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico.Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Yes Verónica Elizabeth, it's possible. Meetings are, at their core, a communication tool. If we have good, structured asynchronous communication, like emails or task boards, we can definitely replace many meetings. It's about choosing the right tool for the job.
Regards!
Francisco Herrera
...
1 reply by Verónica Elizabeth Pozo Ruiz
May 08, 2025 10:33 AM
Verónica Elizabeth Pozo Ruiz
...
I agree with you, Francisco. With proper organization, appropriate communication tools, and asynchronous communication, a project can be carried out smoothly and successfully without necessarily holding meetings. The key is to select the best collaborative work tools, appropriate for the type of project to be developed.
You absolutely can manage projects without formal meetings when your requirements are crystal clear and well-documented. A thoughtful email or a quick phone call often gets the job done more efficiently and written communication gives everyone something to refer back to.
I'd say at least one meeting is essential for every project to ensure success and strengthen the project team's fabric. Cutting unnecessary meetings can reclaim precious hours of your week and help everyone stay in their productive flow state. However, meetings bring benefits like enhanced human connection allowing team members to align on goals, discuss challenges, and clarify any misunderstandings. The closer the team works together, the better the project’s success!
...
1 reply by Varun Jayaraman
Mar 21, 2025 6:44 PM
Varun Jayaraman
...
As much as I love the idea of no meetings, I agree with Anita and other's comments. This depends on the project and brings to mind stacey complexity model (ex., projects are complex when there is low certainty in solution and low agreement in requirements). Along with communications, well organized meetings with engaged attendees can give space for:
1. clarity (around end state, blockers, etc.)
2. connections (understanding other's working style, personalities etc.)
3. collaboration (assisting others in defining problems, brainstorming solutions etc.)
Product Operations Program ManagerBarcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Possible? I guess so. Recommended? Certainly not. Whilst the performance of certain tasks could be asynchronous, others benefit from in person or virtual meetings. I could not imagine kicking off a project or collecting requirements without a meeting for that effect. Saving Changes...
It is possible, but mainly with a small team that is highly in-sync on a small scope project. Clear documentation, as another poster said above, is critical to this as well. The bigger and more complex the project, the higher the need for synchronous communication, IMO. Saving Changes...
Community Champion
