Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Do We Still Need Gantt Charts in Agile Projects?

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile   Decision Making   PMO  
avatar
Pavan Maddi
Community Champion
Buona Vista, Singapore

Gantt charts have been a staple in project management for decades, helping teams track timelines and dependencies. But in an Agile environment, where priorities shift quickly, do Gantt charts still add value, or are they becoming outdated?

How do you all manage timelines in Agile without losing visibility?

Sort By:
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Pavan -

Yes, unless 100% of the scope of the project is being delivered in a simple, linear, incremental/iterative manner. In most cases, there will be aspects of the project which will be delivered in a non-agile manner and/or external dependencies which need to be tracked and scheduled.

The level of detail might be at a higher level than the low level of detail we find in predictive approaches, but Gantt charts can still be valuable.

Kiron
...
1 reply by Pavan Maddi
Apr 02, 2025 8:31 PM
Pavan Maddi
...

Great insight! Agreed
It’s all about using the right tools for the right context. Thanks for sharing your perspective!

avatar
Pavan Maddi
Community Champion
Buona Vista, Singapore
Apr 02, 2025 4:17 PM
Replying to Kiron Bondale
...
Pavan -

Yes, unless 100% of the scope of the project is being delivered in a simple, linear, incremental/iterative manner. In most cases, there will be aspects of the project which will be delivered in a non-agile manner and/or external dependencies which need to be tracked and scheduled.

The level of detail might be at a higher level than the low level of detail we find in predictive approaches, but Gantt charts can still be valuable.

Kiron

Great insight! Agreed
It’s all about using the right tools for the right context. Thanks for sharing your perspective!

avatar
Mohammed Tahseen Shaikh Project Manager| Scotiabank Georgetown, Ontario, Canada

Gantt charts still hold value in certain contexts. They can be useful for executive or stakeholder reporting, cross-team coordination, and long-term planning. Projects running in hybrid (Agile + Waterfall) environments can particularly benefit from incorporating Gantt charts.



However, Gantt charts should be avoided for daily Agile tracking, especially in fast-changing environments where maintaining them becomes a burden. In most cases, burndown charts and Kanban boards are more effective for managing Agile work.



It’s best to use lightweight, high-level Gantt charts at the epic or feature level for planning and communication not as detailed task trackers.

...
1 reply by Pavan Maddi
Apr 06, 2025 9:55 AM
Pavan Maddi
...

Great point! Gantt charts are still valuable for high-level planning, but Agile needs flexibility. Burndown charts and Kanban boards fit fast-moving projects better.

avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
With all my due respect, the worst thing people can do is say things like project. The only thing that exists is initiatives using an approach. For example, agile. On the other side, all is about process/tools and techniques/people. Gantt chart can be used as a tool with any type of approach.
...
1 reply by Pavan Maddi
Apr 06, 2025 9:55 AM
Pavan Maddi
...

I see your point! Initiatives and approaches matter more than the label “project.” Gantt charts, as a tool, can certainly fit within various methodologies, including Agile.

avatar
Pavan Maddi
Community Champion
Buona Vista, Singapore
Apr 03, 2025 9:16 AM
Replying to Mohammed Tahseen Shaikh
...

Gantt charts still hold value in certain contexts. They can be useful for executive or stakeholder reporting, cross-team coordination, and long-term planning. Projects running in hybrid (Agile + Waterfall) environments can particularly benefit from incorporating Gantt charts.



However, Gantt charts should be avoided for daily Agile tracking, especially in fast-changing environments where maintaining them becomes a burden. In most cases, burndown charts and Kanban boards are more effective for managing Agile work.



It’s best to use lightweight, high-level Gantt charts at the epic or feature level for planning and communication not as detailed task trackers.

Great point! Gantt charts are still valuable for high-level planning, but Agile needs flexibility. Burndown charts and Kanban boards fit fast-moving projects better.

avatar
Pavan Maddi
Community Champion
Buona Vista, Singapore
Apr 05, 2025 7:58 AM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
With all my due respect, the worst thing people can do is say things like project. The only thing that exists is initiatives using an approach. For example, agile. On the other side, all is about process/tools and techniques/people. Gantt chart can be used as a tool with any type of approach.

I see your point! Initiatives and approaches matter more than the label “project.” Gantt charts, as a tool, can certainly fit within various methodologies, including Agile.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

The only people who find what they are looking for in life are the fault finders.

- Foster's Law

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors