Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Do Project Managers Need to Be Subject Matter Experts? Or Just Great Facilitators?

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
Zakaria Botros
Community Champion
Project Manager | Driving Clean Energy Innovations for a Sustainable Future| Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Ontario, Canada
I've seen projects where the PM was a deep subject matter expert — and others where they had zero domain knowledge but were master facilitators and leaders.


In your experience, which works better?
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal

Zakaria Botros
Great question — and one that cuts to the heart of what it truly means to lead projects.

The best project managers are not either subject matter experts or facilitators — they are both, in the right measure. But how they acquire that balance is crucial.

I align with the Japanese model, where you only become a project manager after working directly in projects — gaining hands-on technical knowledge before stepping into leadership.
There, training happens in both domains: first, in execution; then, in coordination and strategy.

Why is this so effective?

A PM who lacks domain knowledge may facilitate well — but they risk missing critical risks, making unrealistic commitments, or losing credibility with technical teams.

A PM who is only technical but lacks leadership may micromanage or fail to align stakeholders.

The sweet spot is technical fluency + leadership maturity — and that only comes from experience, not theory.

To lead effectively, you must understand what you're asking others to deliver.
You don’t need to be the top technical expert in the room — but you must have lived enough of the reality to ask the right questions, spot the weak signals, and earn the team's trust.

So in my view:

"Just being a facilitator" is not enough.
Being a grounded leader — fluent in both delivery and direction — is what makes projects succeed.

...
3 replies by Oala Rarua, Valentine Mrozek, and Zakaria Botros
Jun 09, 2025 5:20 PM
Zakaria Botros
...
Love this statement: “The sweet spot is technical fluency + leadership maturity.”
It has a certain music to it — really resonates. I think it can be used as a kind of "flag statement" for how we should think about modern project leadership. I might just adopt it!

Thanks for the great insight.
Jun 11, 2025 9:51 PM
Valentine Mrozek
...
I agree with What has already been stated.
Being a subject matter expert is good in order to understand what they are saying when they speak in their technical areas, but I believe being a leader and understanding the fundamentals of project management is the more important of the 2 attributes.
Jun 17, 2025 9:24 PM
Oala Rarua
...
Grenat insights.
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Zakaria -

A PM requires domain knowledge even if they have a great team of SMEs working with them so that they can speak with some credibility with other stakeholders about the project and they have the ability to ask the right questions. This is why the third leg of PMI's Talent Triangle covers domain expertise.

However, too much knowledge can be dangerous.

Here's an article I wrote back in 2011 about this:

"A question that is frequently asked in online project management communities is “How critical or valuable is it for a project manager to have detailed subject matter expertise or technical competence related to the scope of their projects?”.

To clarify, I am not referring to business or process knowledge – I believe that a PM has to have a good understanding about how the deliverables of their projects will be used and they should have sufficient process awareness to help identify the project and business risks that may reduce benefits realization upon project completion.





Here are a few of the obvious benefits to having “hands on” knowledge and experience.


The ability to help with brainstorming possible solutions to issues as well as the ability to contribute more extensively to risk identification, analysis and response
When the team gets into a crunch, the ability to “pitch in” and keep the schedule on track.
Better ability to validate effort estimates from the team
It can ease the process of earning respect from team members
Avoiding the risks related to “I don’t know what I don’t know”

However soft skills don’t usually increase from having technical competence, and yet, these soft skills are often the biggest source of challenge for PMs.



Beyond this concern, there are other risks to be aware of:


We often default to giving higher priority to those tasks that we are most comfortable with – especially when we are under stress. For a novice PM, this could mean focusing on “hands on” technical work and neglecting core PM activities.
Whereas a PM with limited technical experience is likely to seek knowledge from subject matter experts, a technically competent PM might simply make an assumption based on past experience – since no two projects are the same, what was applicable in one situation may not be applicable in another. In addition, unless the PM is making an effort to remain technically “current”, their knowledge might be obsolete which increases the potential for poor decision making.
There is an increased likelihood of deliverables micro-management or for technical “head-butting” with team members.

With constraints forcing organizations to “cut corners” when staffing project teams, a PM is often expected to perform multiple roles. While this approach can increase the value the PM brings to the organization and is one way of introducing someone to their first PM role, it presents risks that a PM should be aware of and should manage through consistency and self-awareness."

avatar
Pavan Maddi
Community Champion
Buona Vista, Singapore

A PM doesn’t need to be a subject matter expert, but must understand the language of the domain. Great facilitation, communication, and stakeholder management drive project success. SMEs guide the what PMs ensure the how, when, and why stay aligned. Balance is key, but strong leadership always wins.

...
1 reply by Zakaria Botros
Jun 09, 2025 5:25 PM
Zakaria Botros
...
Exactly — leadership always wins because project management is ultimately a people business. It’s all about trust, alignment, and collaboration!
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Zakaria, I probably have a slightly different opinion that my fellow colleagues. In my experience, a strong PM absolutely needs leadership and facilitation skills but that alone isn’t always enough.

Leadership is critical, but domain knowledge matters. A project manager should have at least a baseline level of domain and technical knowledge to effectively lead, assess estimates, understand dependencies, and manage risks. Without that, it becomes difficult to make informed decisions or challenge assumptions, especially on complex projects.

This might vary by industry, but in fields like construction, engineering, or healthcare, it's incredibly hard to manage large-scale initiatives without real domain expertise. You simply can’t rely on being a great facilitator if you don’t understand what’s at stake or how the work truly gets done.

Of course, the level of expertise needed might depend on the project complexity but let’s not kid ourselves because in most cases, a complete lack of subject matter understanding becomes a real limitation.
...
1 reply by Zakaria Botros
Jun 09, 2025 5:26 PM
Zakaria Botros
...
Thanks Rami for your comment. Great point — totally agree that context matters.
avatar
Khai Ng. IT PMO | IT Project Manager| TTGROUP Hanoi, Viet Nam
Suppose two project managers have the same set of characteristics, then the one with a deeper understanding of the subject matter will definitely perform better. That is why we always see job postings requiring applicants to have domain knowledge relevant to the projects they will manage.
...
1 reply by Zakaria Botros
Jun 09, 2025 5:28 PM
Zakaria Botros
...
Thanks for sharing your input! I agree that domain knowledge adds value
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Zakaria I believe it should be both, and that part should be addressed according to the situation.
Regards! Francisco.
avatar
Zakaria Botros
Community Champion
Project Manager | Driving Clean Energy Innovations for a Sustainable Future| Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Ontario, Canada
Jun 08, 2025 4:03 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...

Zakaria Botros
Great question — and one that cuts to the heart of what it truly means to lead projects.

The best project managers are not either subject matter experts or facilitators — they are both, in the right measure. But how they acquire that balance is crucial.

I align with the Japanese model, where you only become a project manager after working directly in projects — gaining hands-on technical knowledge before stepping into leadership.
There, training happens in both domains: first, in execution; then, in coordination and strategy.

Why is this so effective?

A PM who lacks domain knowledge may facilitate well — but they risk missing critical risks, making unrealistic commitments, or losing credibility with technical teams.

A PM who is only technical but lacks leadership may micromanage or fail to align stakeholders.

The sweet spot is technical fluency + leadership maturity — and that only comes from experience, not theory.

To lead effectively, you must understand what you're asking others to deliver.
You don’t need to be the top technical expert in the room — but you must have lived enough of the reality to ask the right questions, spot the weak signals, and earn the team's trust.

So in my view:

"Just being a facilitator" is not enough.
Being a grounded leader — fluent in both delivery and direction — is what makes projects succeed.

Love this statement: “The sweet spot is technical fluency + leadership maturity.”
It has a certain music to it — really resonates. I think it can be used as a kind of "flag statement" for how we should think about modern project leadership. I might just adopt it!

Thanks for the great insight.
avatar
Zakaria Botros
Community Champion
Project Manager | Driving Clean Energy Innovations for a Sustainable Future| Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Ontario, Canada
Jun 08, 2025 10:30 AM
Replying to Pavan Maddi
...

A PM doesn’t need to be a subject matter expert, but must understand the language of the domain. Great facilitation, communication, and stakeholder management drive project success. SMEs guide the what PMs ensure the how, when, and why stay aligned. Balance is key, but strong leadership always wins.

Exactly — leadership always wins because project management is ultimately a people business. It’s all about trust, alignment, and collaboration!
avatar
Zakaria Botros
Community Champion
Project Manager | Driving Clean Energy Innovations for a Sustainable Future| Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Ontario, Canada
Jun 08, 2025 2:06 PM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
Zakaria, I probably have a slightly different opinion that my fellow colleagues. In my experience, a strong PM absolutely needs leadership and facilitation skills but that alone isn’t always enough.

Leadership is critical, but domain knowledge matters. A project manager should have at least a baseline level of domain and technical knowledge to effectively lead, assess estimates, understand dependencies, and manage risks. Without that, it becomes difficult to make informed decisions or challenge assumptions, especially on complex projects.

This might vary by industry, but in fields like construction, engineering, or healthcare, it's incredibly hard to manage large-scale initiatives without real domain expertise. You simply can’t rely on being a great facilitator if you don’t understand what’s at stake or how the work truly gets done.

Of course, the level of expertise needed might depend on the project complexity but let’s not kid ourselves because in most cases, a complete lack of subject matter understanding becomes a real limitation.
Thanks Rami for your comment. Great point — totally agree that context matters.
avatar
Zakaria Botros
Community Champion
Project Manager | Driving Clean Energy Innovations for a Sustainable Future| Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Ontario, Canada
Jun 08, 2025 9:58 PM
Replying to Khai Ng.
...
Suppose two project managers have the same set of characteristics, then the one with a deeper understanding of the subject matter will definitely perform better. That is why we always see job postings requiring applicants to have domain knowledge relevant to the projects they will manage.
Thanks for sharing your input! I agree that domain knowledge adds value
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"My goal is simple. It is complete understanding of the universe, why it is as it is, and why it exists at all."

- Stephen Hawking

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors