Using AI as a support, not as a substitute: facilitating communication, automating repetitive tasks and enhancing decision making without replacing human interaction. Integrating it as a collaborative tool, not as a protagonist.
I agree that AI should be used as a collaborative tool to assist us in our tasks, but not to replace the original and creative work humans produce. Saving Changes...
michele oksaBusiness Operations Program ManagerWi, United States
Oct 08, 2025 10:28 AM
Replying to Aaron Porter
...
A common refrain I've heard for a couple of years now is that AI isn't going to replace you, but somebody that knows how to use it might. As a Project Manager, you can learn everything there is to know about GenAI and how to use it effectively in your job and on your projects, but ultimately, the decision of whether you or a team member gets replaced by AI is out of your control.
Fortunately, the signals are indicating that mass disruption of the job market due to GenAI is unlikely, at least in the near term. A recent post on LinkedIn referenced reports from Yale University Budget Lab and The Brookings Institution making statements to the effect that it hasn't happened yet and cited further sources indicating that widespread technological disruption in the workplace generally takes decades.
According to a recent report from MIT's Media Lab, "The State of AI in Business 2025", 95% of corporate AI initiatives fail, largely due to companies pursuing hype, not strategy. Where GenAI is likely to find the most success is in areas like back-office automation, procurement, finance, and operations - changing the nature of the work being done without replacing people.
An article in Forbes discusses the MIT report, and it gives a quote I may have to borrow - Technology doesn't fix misalignment. It amplifies it. Automating a flawed process only helps you do the wrong thing faster. Add GenAI and you risk runaway damage before anyone realizes what's happening.
The message behind these reports is that, applied effectively, GenAI can change the nature of work and that, if you're paying attention, you have time to prepare. It's too soon to say what that change will be. So, make sure that when you use GenAI, you're using it to enhance the right things. If you use GenAI and cause failure and loss, can you blame GenAI?
To answer the last part of the question - how do you ensure that AI strengthens teamwork - here are some considerations:
- Create GenAI working agreements. For example:
* GenAI is for drafts; humans own the final product
* Always verify facts before using GenAI outputs
* Be transparent about GenAI content
- Encourage team members to experiment with GenAI and share what works with each other
- Capture lessons learned about GenAI usage and share what is and isn't working with a broader audience
Aaron, I enjoyed reading your post. I think the way AI presents information in a human-like communication style combined with its ability to search vast amounts of data to create responses and recommendations can give us a false sense of security and trust in its output. If we walk away from AI because we fear it, it becomes easier for organizations to believe that AI is “smart enough” on its own to do our jobs. But if we lean in, showing that we understand and can manage both AI and its output then we can demonstrate why it isn’t yet capable of replacing many roles. We can highlight where it’s strong, where it’s weak and requires human intervention, and what it would need before it could truly take on certain tasks. I’ve challenged my team to treat AI like an intern: assign it specific tasks, validate its work, train it, and decide where it brings real value for continued “employment.” Saving Changes...
AI should be directed on how and when to be used, while the team members should implement and approve the final product. AI is a team member with less authority Saving Changes...
Great question! Keep the team engaged and curious at all levels of the workflow. Utilize AI to accelerate the creative process and simplify, identify surface patterns, bring clarity to unstructured input and highlight opportunity areas. AI = Co-Pilot not the Driver. Experiment and connect discovery to delivery. Saving Changes...
AI is a change initiative so it's important that we keep everyone onboard to maximize the benefit. The value has to be realized by reaping benefits of AI and passing it on to the team to help them perform better. Its great for all PMI members Saving Changes...
What is the best book for learning fundamentals of AI (Practical Approach ML) Saving Changes...
Omar JabbarProject Management and Digital Transformation Consultant| OGreen IT Service Inc.Ontario, Canada
I may have a different perspective on this topic. AI has the potential to automate many processes across various methodologies, including Agile, which will inevitably change how teams operate. As efficiency and productivity increase, traditional roles may diminish, creating an environment where both processes and certain, if not all, human functions are replaced by advanced technology, similar to how Amazon operates today.
Keeping AI as a partner (not a replacement) requires more than technical safeguards.
It demands human intention, clarity of purpose, and relational maturity.
Agile values individuals and interactions, not out of nostalgia, but because real value creation happens in living ecosystems, where trust, empathy, and shared learning are irreplaceable.
In my practice, we treat AI as a team member with a defined role, clear boundaries, and ethical purpose.
Not a “technical miracle,” but a cognitive collaborator, serving the team’s collective intelligence.
AI can:
- Speed up backlog grooming, but it does not decide what matters to the customer.
- Detect patterns in retrospectives, but it doesn’t replace honest dialogue.
- Suggest technical improvements, but it must never silence team voices.
Real-world example:
In a recent project, we used AI to synthesize scattered stakeholder feedback before a critical release.
AI revealed useful patterns, but it was the team, through open discussion, that decided what to prioritize.
AI proposed.
The team decided.
Purpose guided.
This triad is central to our regenerative decision-making model (RCPCV™):
AI proposes | Team decides | Purpose guides
Here lies the ethical boundary:
- If AI doesn’t build trust, doesn’t stimulate dialogue, and doesn’t respect shared vision -
then it’s not collaborating. It’s automating.
And Agile is not about automating interactions.
It’s about growing together with awareness, responsibility, and purpose.
How are you integrating AI into your Agile teams without losing what makes us human?
سؤال رائع وإجابات من خبرات الزملاء ممتازة ومفيدة جداً , أضف اليها أن الذكاء الأصطناعى ليس بديل عن الإنسان بل هو آداة حديثة لإضافة مقترحات متعددة حسب البيانات المدخله الى البرنامج والاختيار النهائى من المقترحات هو للانسان حسب الحاجه والموقف والمصلحه Saving Changes...
Lokesh TodiPMI, PSPO Certified, PM, Author| Fortune 500 CompanyMumbai, India
Best part about AI chat tools is that it has Help automatically built into it, which means that Learning curve is getting shorter and shorter and efficiency and professional execution is gradually becoming a benchmark expectation. Saving Changes...