beatriz del pilar colon
This is a thoughtful and relevant ethical dilemma, one that many PMs eventually face in the real world, especially in highly regulated or audited environments.
Here's a possible frame to consider:
Ethical responsibility and leadership engagement are not necessarily in opposition but the sequence and clarity of intent matter deeply.
From a general ethical standpoint (and especially if the PM is subject to a formal code of ethics, like PMI’s):
- There’s a professional duty to act with honesty and responsibility, especially when a risk of audit or broader stakeholder impact is involved.
Transparency is not optional, it’s a core leadership principle.
From a governance and leadership engagement perspective:
The PM also has a duty to involve key stakeholders (including the sponsor) to ensure corrective actions are aligned, sustainable, and contextually appropriate (avoiding premature escalation, if not legally required).
So, in practical terms, what I’ve seen in mature organizations is often:
- Document the issue clearly (facts, risks, possible impact).
- Engage the sponsor and governance bodies (e.g., PMO, compliance lead) for shared understanding.
-Assess whether immediate disclosure is mandatory by law, contract, or internal policy.
- If not mandatory, define corrective action with a timeline, including conditions for formal disclosure.
- If leadership avoids action or downplays the issue, the PM has an ethical obligation to escalate responsibly or disclose if mandated.
The key is not to delay indefinitely.
Ethics is not postponed accountability.
Final thought: Leadership engagement is a strength but not if it becomes a shield against transparency.
The PM must navigate with integrity, clarity, and courage whether or not bound to a formal code.
