Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

During Planning how to meet project objectives in Agile

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile  
avatar
beatriz del pilar colon None miami, FL, United States

Hi everyone, I’m trying to clarify a point about Agile project planning. When planning, is it better for the team to:



Ensure each user story has a clear Definition of Done (DoD) to validate completion continuously, or



Plan a final quality review/checkpoint at the end of delivery to verify that objectives are met?



Which approach aligns better with Agile principles, and why?"

Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Sandeep Kashyap CEO| ProofHub India

In Agile, it’s always better to build quality in as you go rather than wait till the end.



That’s why having a clear Definition of Done (DoD) for every user story is key. It helps the team check progress continuously and ensures you’re always delivering something usable.



A final review can still be useful, but more like a light double-check. If you rely only on that, you risk finding issues too late.



So, DoD first, checkpoint second. That’s what keeps you closer to Agile values.

< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first."

- Mark Twain

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors