Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

What Does “Project Success” Really Mean?

linkedin twitter facebook   Digital Project Management   Sustainability   Teams  
avatar
Gwenola Michaud
Community Champion
Project Manager & Advisor| Geosciences & Monitoring Consulting Milano, Italy

In project management theory, a project is successful if it meets its scope, time, cost, and quality criteria.

On paper, this is straightforward.

But in practice, I wonder if meeting these four criteria is enough to truly call a project “successful.”

Let’s take a scenario: a project delivers exactly what was planned, on time, within budget, and with the expected quality—but it required sustained extreme effort, long working hours, and significant personal or team sacrifice over an extended period.

Can we still call that a success?

Would I personally want to repeat that project?

Would the team be willing—or even able—to do it again under the same conditions?

For me, success is also deeply linked to what the team gained along the way:

  • What was learned?
  • How were challenges addressed and resolved?
  • Did the team grow in skills, trust, and resilience?

On the flip side, what about a project that did not deliver as planned? Is it automatically a failure? Or could the lessons learned during that experience become the foundation for success in the next project?

Curious to hear your thoughts.
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Gwenola Michaud
Community Champion
Project Manager & Advisor| Geosciences & Monitoring Consulting Milano, Italy
Thank you all for your thoughful and diverse replies, which strongly echo and reinforce our thoughts.

To summarize the discussion
  • Let's distinguish outcome success from system success as explained by Imran and echoed by Luis, Chia and Preeti, considering also the sustainability of teams and organizations. I really like seeing success as a process or a trajectory instead of a fixed destination like mentioned by Luis.
  • The notion of value delivered to stakeholders clearly emerged as central to any meaningful definition of success as firstly pointed by Veronica and then by Rami, Babatunde and Jacob.
  • The distinction between the strategic (Why - the vision) and the operational (How the mission) impacts was clearly presented and added depth to how to assess project impact by Babatunde
  • I value also theemphasis on added capability building and reusable assets, which feed future success beyond the life of a single project as indicated by Chia.and Rony who indicated also that sometimes lesson learnt could turn unfortunately into Who-to-blame session.Thank you for this honest mention here.
Finally, thank you to Aaron and Babatunde for having shared clear, concrete and real life examples in this discussion.

Let's continue to learn and move away from surviving mode and risk of "tripping over our own shoelace" for our future projects.
avatar
Margaret Oliver Founder & CEO| Raven Rock Media Group, LLC Pullman, WA, United States
From a project management perspective, scope, time, cost, and quality remain essential measures of success. They indicate whether the planned deliverable was produced as intended. However, they do not fully account for the sustainability of the effort or the real cost to the people involved. A project that meets its targets but requires sustained overwork, loss of personal time, or significant strain on team members carries hidden costs. Fatigue, reduced morale, and diminished capacity to take on future work all affect long-term performance. Participation itself should be treated as a resource with measurable costs and benefits. If deadlines are met only by compromising quality of life, then success is incomplete.

In practice, I consider a project truly successful only when it delivers its outcomes while preserving the team’s well-being and willingness to work together again. Sustainable execution is as important as technical delivery. At the same time, projects that do not meet every target are not automatically failures. The knowledge gained, the problems solved, and the skills developed often create lasting value. Lessons learned can strengthen processes, improve planning, and increase the likelihood of success in the next initiative.

For these reasons, I view success in three dimensions: delivery, sustainability, and learning. When all three are present, a project not only meets its immediate goals but also strengthens the organization and the people who make the work possible.
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"If this isn't a Strad, I'm out 50 bucks."

- Jack Benny

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors







Vendor Events

See all Vendor Events

Newsletters

Jun 3: The Career Problem Facing New PMs
May 20: Your PM Career as a Project Life Cycle
May 13: The Big Lie After Layoffs

See all newsletters