Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

As a Program Manager; How to manage a delayed project from a PM from a different area/department

linkedin twitter facebook   Complexity   Leadership   Teams  
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

Colleagues,

I’ve just been assigned a new program, and one of the projects is currently in the implementation phase and significantly delayed. To make it more challenging, the Project Manager (PM) comes from a different area/department than mine, so we are not part of the same immediate team.

As you can imagine, the PM is fully focused on 'firefighting' to recover the schedule, making it very difficult to get their time for a proper onboarding or knowledge transfer. I want to start adding value quickly without becoming an additional burden for them.

What strategies do you use when taking over or overseeing a project in this state? How do you build rapport and gather critical information when the other PM is overwhelmed and from a different area/department? I’m looking for ways to be a partner in the recovery rather than just another person asking for reports.

Looking forward to your insights! Francisco

Sort By:
avatar
Pavan Maddi
Community Champion
Buona Vista, Singapore
In these situations I first build trust by asking the PM what support would remove pressure, not add to it. A short daily sync and a simple recovery view of risks, milestones and blockers helps us get aligned fast. Once they feel you are helping to clear the path, the information flow improves and the schedule recovery becomes a shared effort.
...
2 replies by Francisco Herrera and Guillaume Baron
Feb 16, 2026 2:48 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
Pavan Maddi thanks a lot for your advices! I like the idea of asking what support would remove pressure instead of adding to it. I will apply this strategy immediately by focusing on clearing blockers for the PM. I'm sure that becoming a 'partner in the recovery' will make the information flow much smoother. Thanks for the insight!
Francisco
Feb 18, 2026 9:24 AM
Guillaume Baron
...
I agree with Pavan, this is best way to proceed.
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Francisco,
You are approaching this with the right mindset. In delayed projects, posture matters as much as process.
If the PM is firefighting, your role is not additional oversight but structural relief.

Focus on three levers.
First, ask what friction you can remove at program level.
Trust builds when you reduce pressure instead of increasing reporting.

Second, clarify decision rights and escalation paths.
Significant delays across departments are often governance and prioritization issues, not execution failure.

Third, protect the PM’s cognitive bandwidth.
Form an initial view from available artifacts and use short validation conversations instead of heavy onboarding sessions.

At program level, your value is systemic: restore clarity of decisions, align trade-offs with strategic intent and stabilize interdependencies.
When you become the architect of coherence rather than another control layer, you accelerate recovery without becoming a burden.
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
Feb 17, 2026 12:38 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
Luis Branco thanks I truly appreciate your advice on becoming an 'architect of coherence' rather than just another control layer.

I will implement your three levers as soon as possible:

Removing friction at the program level to build trust; Clarifying decision rights to fix governance issues; and
Protecting the PM’s bandwidth by using existing artifacts instead of long sessions.

This mindset of providing 'structural relief' is exactly what I need to accelerate the recovery. Thanks for the guidance! Francisco.
avatar
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
Community Champion
Program Manager| HARPER SRL Santo Domingo / Distrito Nacional, Dominican Republic
I’d position myself as support, not oversight.
Ask what’s blocking recovery and remove friction at program level.
Build context from existing artifacts, validate quickly, and focus on clarifying priorities and escalation paths.
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
Feb 18, 2026 1:10 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa I will definitely focus on using existing artifacts to build context. Instead of asking the PM for new reports or long onboarding sessions, I will analyze the current documentation to understand the situation. This allows me to validate my findings through quick conversations, ensuring I provide support without adding an administrative burden. My goal is to use the data we already have to clarify priorities and fix the escalation paths immediately. Francisco
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Feb 13, 2026 6:53 PM
Replying to Pavan Maddi
...
In these situations I first build trust by asking the PM what support would remove pressure, not add to it. A short daily sync and a simple recovery view of risks, milestones and blockers helps us get aligned fast. Once they feel you are helping to clear the path, the information flow improves and the schedule recovery becomes a shared effort.
Pavan Maddi thanks a lot for your advices! I like the idea of asking what support would remove pressure instead of adding to it. I will apply this strategy immediately by focusing on clearing blockers for the PM. I'm sure that becoming a 'partner in the recovery' will make the information flow much smoother. Thanks for the insight!
Francisco
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Feb 14, 2026 6:26 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
Francisco,
You are approaching this with the right mindset. In delayed projects, posture matters as much as process.
If the PM is firefighting, your role is not additional oversight but structural relief.

Focus on three levers.
First, ask what friction you can remove at program level.
Trust builds when you reduce pressure instead of increasing reporting.

Second, clarify decision rights and escalation paths.
Significant delays across departments are often governance and prioritization issues, not execution failure.

Third, protect the PM’s cognitive bandwidth.
Form an initial view from available artifacts and use short validation conversations instead of heavy onboarding sessions.

At program level, your value is systemic: restore clarity of decisions, align trade-offs with strategic intent and stabilize interdependencies.
When you become the architect of coherence rather than another control layer, you accelerate recovery without becoming a burden.
Luis Branco thanks I truly appreciate your advice on becoming an 'architect of coherence' rather than just another control layer.

I will implement your three levers as soon as possible:

Removing friction at the program level to build trust; Clarifying decision rights to fix governance issues; and
Protecting the PM’s bandwidth by using existing artifacts instead of long sessions.

This mindset of providing 'structural relief' is exactly what I need to accelerate the recovery. Thanks for the guidance! Francisco.
avatar
Guillaume Baron
Community Champion
Project Manager| CREOS Bertrange, Luxembourg
Feb 13, 2026 6:53 PM
Replying to Pavan Maddi
...
In these situations I first build trust by asking the PM what support would remove pressure, not add to it. A short daily sync and a simple recovery view of risks, milestones and blockers helps us get aligned fast. Once they feel you are helping to clear the path, the information flow improves and the schedule recovery becomes a shared effort.
I agree with Pavan, this is best way to proceed.
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
Feb 20, 2026 12:59 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
It works for me as well! Francisco.
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Feb 15, 2026 5:15 PM
Replying to Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
...
I’d position myself as support, not oversight.
Ask what’s blocking recovery and remove friction at program level.
Build context from existing artifacts, validate quickly, and focus on clarifying priorities and escalation paths.
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa I will definitely focus on using existing artifacts to build context. Instead of asking the PM for new reports or long onboarding sessions, I will analyze the current documentation to understand the situation. This allows me to validate my findings through quick conversations, ensuring I provide support without adding an administrative burden. My goal is to use the data we already have to clarify priorities and fix the escalation paths immediately. Francisco
avatar
Omar Jabbar Project Management and Digital Transformation Consultant| OGreen IT Service Inc. Ontario, Canada
I am always looking for simplicity in my approach: When I step into a program with a delayed project led by a PM from another department, which is always the case, I focus first on building trust, not asking for updates. I work independently to gather context from artifacts, stakeholders, and existing data, thereby reducing the PM's workload rather than adding to it. Once these PMs see I’m there to support recovery, not manage them, they become more open, and that’s when true partnership and recovery begin.
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
Feb 23, 2026 11:56 AM
Francisco Herrera
...
Omar Jabbar I have been following a similar path! I’ve focused heavily on building trust, although opportunities to interact have been quite limited so far. I really like your idea of gathering context independently to reduce the PM's workload.

Which specific artifacts do you usually prioritize when you start reviewing a project on your own? I want to make sure I’m looking at the right data before our next sync. I will definitely keep focusing on these two approaches: building trust and working independently to support the recovery. I had reviewd Business Case, Project Charter, last status report and project plan. Thanks for the advice! Francisco.
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Feb 18, 2026 9:24 AM
Replying to Guillaume Baron
...
I agree with Pavan, this is best way to proceed.
It works for me as well! Francisco.
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Feb 19, 2026 8:11 AM
Replying to Omar Jabbar
...
I am always looking for simplicity in my approach: When I step into a program with a delayed project led by a PM from another department, which is always the case, I focus first on building trust, not asking for updates. I work independently to gather context from artifacts, stakeholders, and existing data, thereby reducing the PM's workload rather than adding to it. Once these PMs see I’m there to support recovery, not manage them, they become more open, and that’s when true partnership and recovery begin.
Omar Jabbar I have been following a similar path! I’ve focused heavily on building trust, although opportunities to interact have been quite limited so far. I really like your idea of gathering context independently to reduce the PM's workload.

Which specific artifacts do you usually prioritize when you start reviewing a project on your own? I want to make sure I’m looking at the right data before our next sync. I will definitely keep focusing on these two approaches: building trust and working independently to support the recovery. I had reviewd Business Case, Project Charter, last status report and project plan. Thanks for the advice! Francisco.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Humanity has advanced, when it has advanced, not because it has been sober, responsible and cautious, but because it has been playful, rebellious and immature."

- Tom Robbins

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors