Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

How is your team measuring success? Are your metrics driving value—or just numbers?

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia

Agile introduced velocity as a simple tool: a way for teams to estimate how much work they can deliver in a sprint, supporting better planning and realistic forecasting. Yet, over time, velocity has been repurposed—and sometimes misused—as a performance metric, leading to unintended consequences for teams and organizations.

How is your team measuring success? Are your metrics driving value—or just numbers?

Full post on ProjectManagement.com - Velocity Misuse and Performance Pressure: Rethinking Agile Metrics

Sort By:
avatar
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
Community Champion
Program Manager| HARPER SRL Santo Domingo / Distrito Nacional, Dominican Republic
hello Stelian ROMAN Velocity is useful for planning, but once people start using it to judge team performance, it usually changes behaviors in the wrong way.

In my case, the metrics depend a lot on what the organization is pursuing. Not all initiatives are measured the same way, but we try to make sure there are clear expectations around what success looks like and why those metrics matter in each case.

The metrics that have helped my teams the most are the ones that help us understand where work is getting stuck, what is slowing delivery down, or whether what we’re building is actually helping.
...
1 reply by Stelian ROMAN
May 18, 2026 6:21 PM
Stelian ROMAN
...
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa, thank you for the feedback. I believe that velocity is misused in most Agile implementations. "Velocity is killing Agility" is a frequent theme. I see no benefit in using it outside the team. Like the burndown chart, invented to keep a manager quiet, velocity can help the team to improve their planning. The other challenge is how we measure velocity. Story points are a relative measure and can be very easily gamed. It is no surprise that the person credited with inventing them apologised.
avatar
Aung Sint
Community Champion
Lead Consultant| Laminar Projects

Coming from a project delivery and planning background, I see a similar issue with many project metrics. The number may look good on a dashboard, but it does not always mean the project is healthier.

A useful metric should help the team make better decisions. If velocity, progress percentage, or any other metric helps us understand capacity, identify blockers, forecast risk, or adjust priorities, it creates value.

But if the metric is mainly used to compare teams, create pressure, or paint a positive picture upward, people will naturally start managing the number rather than the work.

So I think the question is not only “what are we measuring?” but also “what behavior is this metric encouraging?”

...
1 reply by Stelian ROMAN
May 18, 2026 6:25 PM
Stelian ROMAN
...
Aung Sint, thank you. Why we measure is more important than how we measure. The 'cobra effect' is as dangerous in project management as it was in real life: "According to the story, the British government, concerned about the number of venomous cobras in Delhi, offered a bounty for every dead cobra. Initially, this was a successful strategy; large numbers of snakes were killed for the reward. Eventually, however, people began to breed cobras for the income. When the government became aware of this, the reward program was scrapped, and the cobra breeders set their snakes free, leading to an overall increase in the wild cobra population."
If 'velocity' becomes a metric for all projects, forcing other teams to learn how to game the reports.
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia
May 14, 2026 5:06 PM
Replying to Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
...
hello Stelian ROMAN Velocity is useful for planning, but once people start using it to judge team performance, it usually changes behaviors in the wrong way.

In my case, the metrics depend a lot on what the organization is pursuing. Not all initiatives are measured the same way, but we try to make sure there are clear expectations around what success looks like and why those metrics matter in each case.

The metrics that have helped my teams the most are the ones that help us understand where work is getting stuck, what is slowing delivery down, or whether what we’re building is actually helping.
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa, thank you for the feedback. I believe that velocity is misused in most Agile implementations. "Velocity is killing Agility" is a frequent theme. I see no benefit in using it outside the team. Like the burndown chart, invented to keep a manager quiet, velocity can help the team to improve their planning. The other challenge is how we measure velocity. Story points are a relative measure and can be very easily gamed. It is no surprise that the person credited with inventing them apologised.
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia
May 17, 2026 4:41 AM
Replying to Aung Sint
...

Coming from a project delivery and planning background, I see a similar issue with many project metrics. The number may look good on a dashboard, but it does not always mean the project is healthier.

A useful metric should help the team make better decisions. If velocity, progress percentage, or any other metric helps us understand capacity, identify blockers, forecast risk, or adjust priorities, it creates value.

But if the metric is mainly used to compare teams, create pressure, or paint a positive picture upward, people will naturally start managing the number rather than the work.

So I think the question is not only “what are we measuring?” but also “what behavior is this metric encouraging?”

Aung Sint, thank you. Why we measure is more important than how we measure. The 'cobra effect' is as dangerous in project management as it was in real life: "According to the story, the British government, concerned about the number of venomous cobras in Delhi, offered a bounty for every dead cobra. Initially, this was a successful strategy; large numbers of snakes were killed for the reward. Eventually, however, people began to breed cobras for the income. When the government became aware of this, the reward program was scrapped, and the cobra breeders set their snakes free, leading to an overall increase in the wild cobra population."
If 'velocity' becomes a metric for all projects, forcing other teams to learn how to game the reports.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Nothing is particularly hard if you divide it into small jobs."

- Henry Ford

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors