Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Which Team Would You Choose?

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
RECCIA MCKENZIE Program Manager| Biophilia Estate New York, United States

Would you rather have a highly skilled project team with poor communication or a less experienced team with excellent communication? Which would be more likely to succeed?

Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Jun 01, 2026 9:31 AM
Replying to RECCIA MCKENZIE
...
Thank you for this thoughtful perspective. I particularly appreciated your statement that “communication is the mechanism that enables integration, learning, and ultimately project success.” That shifts the discussion beyond simply choosing between technical expertise and communication skills.

Your response also raises another question for me: Have you ever encountered a situation where strong communication actually created a false sense of progress, while technical gaps later became the project’s greatest challenge? In other words, is there a point at which communication alone can no longer compensate for a lack of expertise?

I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on where that balance lies.
That is an excellent question, and I believe the answer is yes.

Communication can compensate for many things, but it cannot compensate indefinitely for the absence of critical expertise.

I have seen teams with strong communication, trust, and collaboration create a genuine sense of momentum.
They identified issues early, aligned stakeholders effectively, and adapted faster than expected.
Yet when confronted with complex technical challenges, capability gaps eventually became the limiting factor.

This is because communication and expertise serve different purposes.
Expertise determines what a team is capable of accomplishing.
Communication determines how effectively that capability is shared, integrated, and applied.

In my view, communication is not a substitute for expertise. It is a multiplier of expertise.

A team with exceptional experts who cannot communicate will struggle to realize its potential.
A team with excellent communication but insufficient expertise may learn quickly, but will eventually encounter problems it lacks the capability to solve.

The balance lies in recognizing that neither communication nor competence is the ultimate objective.
The objective is the team's ability to convert knowledge into effective action and outcomes.

Perhaps that is why the most successful project teams are rarely those with the strongest communication or the greatest expertise alone.
They are the teams that continuously transform expertise into shared understanding, shared understanding into aligned decisions, and aligned decisions into coordinated execution.
...
1 reply by RECCIA MCKENZIE
Jun 01, 2026 1:57 PM
RECCIA MCKENZIE
...
Thank you for your thoughtful response. I particularly liked your observation that communication is a multiplier of expertise rather than a substitute for it. Your perspective highlights the importance of balancing both capability and collaboration to achieve project success. I appreciate the insights you shared.
avatar
RECCIA MCKENZIE Program Manager| Biophilia Estate New York, United States
Jun 01, 2026 1:18 PM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
That is an excellent question, and I believe the answer is yes.

Communication can compensate for many things, but it cannot compensate indefinitely for the absence of critical expertise.

I have seen teams with strong communication, trust, and collaboration create a genuine sense of momentum.
They identified issues early, aligned stakeholders effectively, and adapted faster than expected.
Yet when confronted with complex technical challenges, capability gaps eventually became the limiting factor.

This is because communication and expertise serve different purposes.
Expertise determines what a team is capable of accomplishing.
Communication determines how effectively that capability is shared, integrated, and applied.

In my view, communication is not a substitute for expertise. It is a multiplier of expertise.

A team with exceptional experts who cannot communicate will struggle to realize its potential.
A team with excellent communication but insufficient expertise may learn quickly, but will eventually encounter problems it lacks the capability to solve.

The balance lies in recognizing that neither communication nor competence is the ultimate objective.
The objective is the team's ability to convert knowledge into effective action and outcomes.

Perhaps that is why the most successful project teams are rarely those with the strongest communication or the greatest expertise alone.
They are the teams that continuously transform expertise into shared understanding, shared understanding into aligned decisions, and aligned decisions into coordinated execution.
Thank you for your thoughtful response. I particularly liked your observation that communication is a multiplier of expertise rather than a substitute for it. Your perspective highlights the importance of balancing both capability and collaboration to achieve project success. I appreciate the insights you shared.
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

It is better to ask some of the questions than to know all the answers.

- James Thurber

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors