Hello Everyone,
I am looking for some guidance from members who have successfully submitted articles or templates to the official PMI content portal.
Lately, there has been an immense amount of discussion around integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into the PMO. However, as many of us have experienced, simply pasting sensitive enterprise data into generic chat prompts frequently yields inconsistent results, cognitive drift, or hallucinations that violate our strict project governance.
To solve this, I spent the last several months developing a localized, open-source framework designed to move beyond manual prompting. It translates the core principles and performance domains of the PMBOK® Guide – Eighth Edition into a machine-readable, deterministic "operating system" for autonomous AI Agents.
The framework is structured as a zero-dependency, local-first knowledge corpus consisting of:
- 48 Executable PMO Skills: Programmatic Standard Operating Procedures defining exact inputs, outputs, and validation rules.
- 41 Structured Process Records: Core PMBOK® 8 processes mapped cleanly into machine-readable data structures.
- 92 Audited Deliverable Templates: A complete artifact pipeline spanning from the initial Business Case through formal Project Closure.
- 59 Compliance Test Scenarios: Automated validation checks to audit project data health and process adherence objectively.
Because this framework bridges the gap between PMI standards and automated software execution while maintaining absolute data sovereignty, I believe it could offer significant practical value to the wider global community. My goal is to formally submit an article and these machine-readable templates to the PMI platform for review.
I have two questions for the community:
- For those who have gone through the official PMI submission process: What are your best practices for formatting and tailoring content to ensure a smooth review? Are there specific elements the review board prioritizes when evaluating AI-focused project management frameworks?
- For PMO leaders and technical project managers here: I am currently at version 0.4 (MIT licensed) and want to ensure this is completely bulletproof before submission. Would anyone be willing to pressure-test the structured skill definitions, review the compliance logic, and collaborate on evolving this toward a stable version 1.0 standard?
Note: To adhere strictly to community guidelines regarding external links and self-promotion, I have omitted direct URLs here.
